topic: Evaluate whether a lightweight multi-agent workflow is the right MVP architecture

brief:
  project_background: We are building a lightweight AI collaboration product.
  current_state: We have a single-agent prototype but want more reliable analysis quality.
  constraints:
    - MVP must ship quickly
    - Team is small
    - Heavy frameworks are out of scope
  success_criteria:
    - Better output quality than one agent
    - Low system complexity
    - Easy maintenance
  non_goals:
    - No web UI in this phase

decision_packet:
  decision_to_make: Decide whether to adopt a lightweight multi-agent meeting engine for the MVP
  options:
    - Stay single-agent
    - Build lightweight multi-agent orchestration
    - Adopt a heavy external framework
  evaluation_dimensions:
    - Complexity
    - Output quality
    - Cost
    - Maintainability
  required_questions:
    - Does multi-agent coordination improve output enough to justify the added complexity?
    - What is the lightest viable implementation?

context_sources: []
