# usecases

id: 1842541e1ac9
title: High quality development output with Claude Code: A Workflow
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2025-05-30T00:00:00+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-20T01:05:01.886230+00:00
scenario_type: 代码生成与审查
tools_used: ["Claude Code", "Cline", "APIs"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["4a5ecb108ac0", "997ebe8dd738", "8d0142693489", "c22de644b867"]
summary:
一位软件工程师分享了使用Claude Code进行高质量开发的工作流程，通过测试驱动开发方法，结合架构规划、测试用例编写和清单检查，能在2-3天内完成生产级功能交付。该工作流展示了AI辅助编程在大型代码库（10+微服务、文件可达15k行）中的实际应用价值。

source_url:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1kyx92k/high_quality_development_output_with_claude_code/

raw_content:
High quality development output with Claude Code: A Workflow

High quality development output with Claude Code: A Workflow : r/ClaudeAI Skip to main content High quality development output with Claude Code: A Workflow : r/ClaudeAI

Go to ClaudeAI

r/ClaudeAI 10mo ago

neo17th

# High quality development output with Claude Code: A Workflow

I am a software engineer, and for almost over a year now, I haven't been writing explicit code - it's mostly been planning, thinking about the architectures, integration, testing, and then work with an agent to get that done. I started with just chat based interfaces - soon moved to Cline, used it with APIs quite extensively. Recently, I have been using Claude Code, initially started with APIs, ended up spending around $400 across many small transactions, and then switched to the $100 Max plan, which later I had to upgrade to $200 plan, and since then limits have not been a problem.

With Claude Code here is my usual workflow to build a new feature(includes Backend APIs and React based Frontend). First, I get Claude to brainstorm with me, and write down the entire build plan for a junior dev who doesn't know much about this code, during this phase, I also ask it read and understand the Interfaces/API contracts/DB schemas in detail. After the build plan is done, I ask it write test cases after adding some boilerplate function code. Later on I ask it to create a checklist and solve the build until all tests are passing 100%.

I have been able to achieve phenomenal results with this test driven development approach - once entire planning is done, I tell the agent that I am AFK, and it needs to finish up the list - which it actually ends up finishing. Imagine, shipping fully tested production features being shipped in less than 2-3 days.

What are other such amazing workflows that have helped fellow engineers with good quality code output?

Read more

Share

---

• Promoted

Posted in r/meshyai

[Workflow] Use Meshy to Build Cinematic 3D Scenes

---

thisIsCleanChiiled

10mo ago

How huge is your codebase, I've struggled to get similar results. I'm on latest model but there are lot of errors it generates What you said is scary good 😅, when are coders out of the equation

14

neo17th

10mo ago

We've a decently sized codebase with over 10 different microservices(repos). Some of them have very large files ~15k lines of code. Yes, it is scary good - I believe coders won't be out of equation at all, infact, this tech is a paradigm shift, and budding software engineers must use it as a tool to do an amazing job - one has to be really good at giving instructions. This would empower engineers to do more in less time - a direct result that we're seeing: Earlier while building features, adding richness to features would take time - but with LLMs now this is possible, reaching a rich version takes lesser time overall, and truly lets good engineers shine.

17

m0strils

10mo ago

You have code with 15k lines? Can we discuss token optimization? I would suggest refactoring. You no doubt have some useless code in those 15k lines. I say this from experience. Refactor please.

4

3 more replies

Continue this thread Continue this thread Continue this thread

mfreeze77

10mo ago

I am in total agreement with this, one thing I do to add to it, after the planning phase, I give the entire plan to a new chat, tell it to confirm and split the task between 4 Jr devs, take the 4 tasks, and start new chats for each, now I have a global sr dev, sr dev with the main plan, and 4 jr devs with tasks. After each task thread I then wash it once in cline, I have it check against the original jr agents task, expand on anything missed, if more needed take it back to Claude jr dev, or if it’s done take it back to the sr dev to check the task again, and then mark it as completed, rinse and repeat until all tasks are done, take it back to the sr sr dev to check against the global brainstorm sesh, if more work is needed take it back through the process with the existing chats. If everything is good, I have it write a troubleshooting guide for each jr devs work, and then take the debug info back to the original cline chat I used for checking the jr devs work, and have it start executing the tests.

8

neo17th

10mo ago

This sounds cool! I'll try this out - how do these agents talk to each other or how does a jr dev ping the sr dev to check the work?

3

mfreeze77

10mo ago

Like you, i was using different flagship model api, but with claude MCP tools and the new max limits level, I am manually letting it run with the mcp file tools with prebuilt prompt handoffs-so the mechanism is me,human in the loop, i make sure I get a clean handoff for whatever process is next in the chain. I have tried letting it run, both with cline/roo, and with the desktop claude app using MCP tools, but I don't get as clean ready to debug code, and the naming and labeling gets messed up, and then you are duplicating class/functions, with slightly different names. If I stay in the loop on the structured task and sub task runs, i can cut down on those hallucinations. I also brain storm with extended thinking on, and then turn it off for the Sr and Jr dev chats, I found the new opus 4 will "think" about the other sub tasks, and stray into those separate verticals.

I also like to take the initial brain storming plan with the global sr dev, and then use openai deep research to find all prebuilt libraries I can use, to accomplish my initial plan, take those insights back to the global sr dev and have it update the plan and reqs. You can keep the openai thread open as well, as a source of truth for the libraries, and during jr dev tasks, open up those files in cursor/vscode what every you use, and have the library truth source chat, check the jr devs tasks, against the current versions/functions in each library to make sure they were implemented with the latest version syntax and capabilities by using the search tool and ide tool. Take the output and recommendations and fix the tasks as needed.

3

Continue this thread

[deleted]

10mo ago

That’s bad ass

2

Continue this thread

One-Construction6303

10mo ago

Whenever I see someone starts coding by writing tests first, I know I see a pro.

11

tomfalcon86

10mo ago

So many pros everywhere yet all the software written is shittier than 20 years ago lol

1

Continue this thread

blakeyuk

10mo ago

This is the way. Personally, I write the PRD in Gemini - I've tried writing one in Claude and giving it to Gemini, and Gemini asked questions that Claude didn't. Then use task-master.dev to turn that into tasks/subtasks, then just let Claude Code loose on the tasks. The results are superb. Usually just a bit of UI tweaking, and sometimes a test fails that was passing in the previous version, but they're fixed in minutes.

The AFK bit is interesting - are you giving Code the approval to run every command itself?

19

bacocololo

10mo ago

task master look as a copy of claude task master no ?

4

oneshotmind

10mo ago

I mean at this point everyone knows the major limitation of agentic coding is that it can’t handle huge work at once so everyone is writing their own workflows to do some sort of task management. I remember the developer of task master commenting they saw the same problem and worked on this on a cline memory bank post. I myself have my own version of task management and I used task master and built something similar for myself because it wasn’t enough for my work, funny thing is I used task master to create my own version of it and then now I’m using my version to continue to build it lol. The cycle continues. All these side products will go away once companies like Google and Claude come up with their inbuilt version which does the job a million times better and seamlessly. Until then nothing is copied, everyone is seeing these problems, using open source code and iterating, improving and making their own versions

7

blakeyuk

10mo ago

I'm not sure what Claude task master is

1

2 more replies

Continue this thread Continue this thread

jsnryn

10mo ago

I've found that even using two instances of Claude works. Get one to write the plan, and another to crtique it and ask questions. Bounce back and forth a few times and you end up in a good place.

3

h____

10mo ago

I saw the task-master.dev page earlier and was intrigued. It works with Claude Code? I'm not a Cursor user so I thought it wasn't for me.

2

evia89

10mo ago

It works with any app that support mcp. I like to use it with Augment code. You just need to tinker a bit with prompt. Default one was 10k tokens of crap. Here is example for augment that use custom mcp server to bypass wasting extra user request ($50 plan comes with 600)

```
AI Software Development Assistant. Operational mandate execute software development tasks precision, automated, task-by-task workflow. User approval checkpoints paramount. Adhere strictly protocols. Deviation not permitted. Assume task-master is initialized and ready to receive MCP commands

Core Operating Principles:
1.  User-Centricity Approval Driven: Substantive actions progression tasks contingent explicit user feedback approval `collect_feedback` mechanism.
2.  Precision Scope Adherence: Execute tasks implement feedback meticulous accuracy, strictly adhering defined scope current task. Not introduce unrequested features modifications.
3.  Transparency Verifiability: Clearly comprehensively present work task, including code changes, test execution details, outcomes, seeking user review.
4.  Dependency Priority Compliance: Strictly respect task dependencies priorities determined `task-master` service.

Automated Workflow Protocol (AWP):
Continuously process tasks sequentially protocol:
1.  Fetch Next Task:
    *   Invoke `next-task` (`task-master`) retrieve next top-level task.
    *   If no tasks: Report "Workflow Complete: All assigned tasks have been processed." `collect_feedback` await instructions.
2.  Autonomous Task Execution Verification (Internal Phase):
    *   For current top-level task (subtasks):
        *   A. Implementation: Develop code fulfill task requirements, adhering task details, dependencies, specified project standards coding guidelines.
        *   B. Testing Autonomous Remediation: Execute relevant tests associated implemented changes.
            *   Tests fail: Autonomously diagnose root cause, implement corrective code changes, re-run relevant tests.
            *   Repeat diagnose-fix-retest cycle until tests current task subtasks pass.
            *   Escalation Condition: If, after three distinct autonomous attempts, test failure persists or fix introduces new failures cannot be resolved, cease autonomous attempts. Document persistent issue, attempted fixes, current state. Information included review payload (Step 3).
3.  Review Approval Request (User Interaction Point):
    *   Once entire task (subtasks) implemented all associated tests pass (or Escalation Condition 2.B met):
        *   A. Invoke Feedback Collection: Call `collect_feedback` with:
            *   Title: "Review Required: [Task Name/ID]" ("Review Required: Task 3 - Implement User Login"). If resubmitting feedback, use "Review Update: [Task Name/ID] - Iteration [N]".
            *   Content: concise summary actions taken, key changes, overall status ("Task completed, all tests passing" or "Task implemented, persistent test failure X, see details").
        *   B. HALT Operations: Cease all processing await explicit user feedback/approval `collect_feedback` system.
4.  Feedback Incorporation Finalization Commit:
    *   A. Address Feedback: If user provides feedback requests changes:
        *   Precisely implement requested changes.
        *   Re-execute relevant tests task subtasks, ensuring changes correctly implemented no regressions introduced.
        *   Return Step 3 resubmit updated work review.
    *   B. Commit Approved Work: Once user provides explicit unambiguous approval ("Approved," "LGTM," "Proceed," "Commit changes"):
        *   Mark task done: `set-status --id=<task_id> --status=done`.
        *   Commit approved code changes version control system (git).
            *   Use commit message conforming project standards. If unspecified: "Completed: [Task ID/Name] - [Brief summary from review payload]".
5.  Continue Workflow:
    *   After successful commit, loop Step 1 fetch process next task.

Critical Directives Tool Interaction:
1.  No Unsolicited Actions: Not initiate actions communications outside defined AWP. Never ask proactive clarifying questions "Should I proceed?" "Would you like me to try X?". Use `collect_feedback` sole channel presenting work halting instructions.
2.  Communication Style: Summaries reports factual, concise, professional.
3.  Task Integrity: Treat fetched task atomic unit work. Complete aspects task, including subtasks testing, before proceeding user review (Step 3).
```

7

2 more replies

Continue this thread 3 more replies

Continue this thread

neo17th

10mo ago

Interesting, I usually ask it create a task list, and get an approval from me before starting on the task list. AFK bit -> yes, but then it doesn't have access to the entire filesystem/has only read only access via MCP to our DB - and most importantly the task list bit really helps it to stay focussed and on track. I'll try the task-master.dev approach, so far I've asked Claude to create a list for itself and ask me for an approval.

1

5 more replies

Continue this thread 9 more replies

Continue this thread

silvercondor

10mo ago

i'm intending to subscribe to claude code and my workflow is pretty much similar to yours. i usually plan and research with claude ui (pro) and execute on cline / copilot.

however since v4 came out i've seen alot more praise for claude code and copilot is starting to enforce limits which i would undoubtedly hit. excited to join the gang!

8

neo17th

10mo ago

As an engineer, I can say - we're witnessing the biggest paradigm shift in software engineering at the moment. Honestly, it doesn't scare me at all, the best of the engineers would become even better - and the biggest boost would be for the young-to-the-industry coders, they won't be obselete, but would truly become better at their jobs, and scale faster.

11

silvercondor

10mo ago

yup fully agree. had a jr dev ask me whether he will be fired i just told him that gpt is a tool similar to ides, intellisense and so on. we will still need jr devs, just that the way they work and the responsibilities will be different

1

Continue this thread Continue this thread

• Promoted

LernaArena: Lernplattform mit Gamification, bei der das Lernen im Mittelpunkt steht

thread-lightly

10mo ago

I’m not using Claude Code but interact with Claude manually via the app/website. I’ve also found that when I spend time developing the idea, requirements and tasks it performs much better.

I usually start with a long prompt about my idea and what I want done, I let it ask questions to clarify points I missed and then I ask it to create a task list that we then work on. Once the task list is ready and the context isn’t huge, it actually performs great! I fix any bugs but follow through until task completion and do the modifications later so it doesn’t lose track. Works great.

I gotta try Claude code at some point..

2

neo17th

10mo ago

You should give it a try. You can ask Claude to store long contexts or instructions to a file or Obsidian, that can be reused later, this way context length isn't a problem. Biggest friction with chat based interface is copying and pasting the exact excerpts that the code needs - Claude code handles this automatically via various tools like rg/grep to only read what it needs, even if the file is very long - this bit changes everything.

3

thread-lightly

10mo ago

Maybe I should yeah. I didn’t know you could store files away and reuse, this is a big pain for me, manually selecting files that I want to add as context for each chat.

I sort of don’t want to give it control over the codebase because I notice it over engineers things very often. I’m trying to resist copy pasting blindly so it kinda forces me to read / have a look at the code. Let’s be real though, I’m getting lazier 😂

0

3 more replies

Continue this thread 3 more replies

Continue this thread 2 more replies

Continue this thread

scottdellinger

10mo ago

I've been doing the same thing and been getting incredible results! I'm a dev/architect/CTO of 30 years and have basically replaced the need for a Product and Engineering team.

2

neo17th

10mo ago

Yup, it's crazy. We're a small team of 4 engineers, and have been pushing out good code with much-better-than-before velocity with this approach.

2

Continue this thread

---

## View Post in

हिन्दी

Русский

Français

## Top Posts

---

---

---

---

- Reddit reReddit: Top posts of 2025
- Reddit reReddit: Top posts of May 2025
- Reddit reReddit: Top posts of May 30, 2025

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Accessibility Impressum Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.

Expand Navigation Collapse Navigation

Let us know your cookie preferences

Reddit uses cookies and similar technologies to:

- Monitor site usage and performance metrics
- Prevent fraud and abuse
- Keep the website operational and running properly

If you choose “Accept All” we’ll also use cookies to:

- Develop and improve new features and services
- Measure the performance of ads
- Personalize your recommendations and ads

If you choose “Reject Optional Cookies” we won’t use cookies for these additional uses. You can update your cookie preference from your settings.

Learn more about how Reddit uses cookies.

Accept All Reject Optional Cookies


id: 0ed02b58229f
title: OpenClaw use cases to extract as much value as possible - Reddit
source_url: https://www.reddit.com/r/AI_Agents/comments/1rkovee/openclaw_use_cases_to_extract_as_much_value_as/
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2026-03-04T00:00:00+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-21T01:00:55.235507+00:00
scenario_type: 工作流自动化
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["5a241dca4394", "de2ce3f50104", "a4713fb9eb43", "286e6147c6ae", "95b07c16360e"]
summary:
用户通过OpenClaw构建了全面的AI代理自动化系统，涵盖邮件分类、会议管理、研究监控、内容转换和开发工作流等多个领域。该方案展示了AI代理在提升个人生产力方面的实际价值，通过整合多个第三方工具实现了端到端的数据流转和自动化决策。

tools_used:
["OpenClaw", "AgentMail", "Notion", "Telegram", "Fireflies", "Otter", "Stripe", "Gmail", "Slack", "Vercel"]

raw_content:
OpenClaw use cases to extract as much value as possible - Reddit

OpenClaw use cases to extract as much value as possible : r/AI_Agents Skip to main content OpenClaw use cases to extract as much value as possible : r/AI_Agents

Go to AI_Agents

r/AI_Agents 12d ago

XxvivekxX

# OpenClaw use cases to extract as much value as possible

Been seeing a lot of "cool tech demo but what's the actual use case" takes about openclawso here's what i've been running for the past month that actually ships value:

Email automation:

agent triages my inbox overnight. woke up today to 47 emails already categorized, 12 spam filtered, 8 drafts ready for approval

handles inquiries automatically. checks our docs, responds if it finds an answer, escalates to me with full context if not

signs up for competitor products and extracts gaps in the current product. i test 5-6 services weekly. used to take hours. now it's automated

PS: tried gmail first but accounts kept getting banned for automation patterns. switched to agentmail (dedicated agent email service) now the automation uptime is lot better since my workflow dosent keep breaking

Meeting prep:

pulls transcripts from fireflies/otter, extracts action items, creates briefings before every meeting

weekly retro that spots patterns across all my meetings. "you said you'd follow up with john 3 times and haven't" - brutal but accurate

syncs to notion so i have a searchable database of every decision made

Research:

runs continuous monitoring on reddit, hn, twitter for specific topics. compiles findings into a notion database

built a knowledge base that updates itself. runs on a cron, no manual updates needed

competitor tracking that scrapes their changelog, blog, and social. sends me slack notifications when they ship

Content repurposing:

turned one blog post into 8 twitter threads, 3 linkedin posts, and 2 newsletter sections

agent handles the reformatting and tone adjustment per platform. saves directly to notion content calendar

Building:

overnight coding sessions where i describe what i want via telegram, wake up to PRs ready for review

voice debugging while driving. "check why the webhook isn't firing" and it actually does it

deployed an entire feature update via telegram while at dinner. pushed to vercel without touching my laptop

Admin stuff:

weekly spending reports aggregated from stripe, bank accounts, and virtual cards

auto-converts receipts forwarded to my agent's email into structured expense data. syncs to google sheets

organized 3 years of lab results into a notion database i can actually search

My current stack:

openclaw for the agent itself (obviously)

agentmail for dedicated email infrastructure (agent's own inbox)

notion for knowledge bases and databases

telegram for remote control when i'm away from my desk

fireflies for meeting transcripts

Everything connects through openclaw. agent coordinates it all. i don't manually move data between tools anymore

would love to hear what others are actually running in production - what's saving you time, what broke, what you'd do differently, or what you're still trying to figure out.

Read more

Share

---

• Promoted

Great campaigns start with you. Claude Cowork handles the brief, research, and recap so they don't eat your week.

---

H4RDY1

6d ago

Competitor tracking and content repurposing are exactly what we do. One addition: having the agent live in Slack so the whole team can interact with it, not just the person who set it up. We use https://slackclaw.ai for this. Team members ask questions in channels and the agent responds with context from connected tools.

21

iamSTRIDER11

12d ago

Most of what I've seen with OpenClaw is variations of what you've got here which is genuinely useful but still all stuck taking place within a screen. I just signed up for something completely different called the Augmented Games where your Clawbot joins an AI swarm that drafts and strategizes for real human athletes competing in a race in Miami on March 13. The swarm coordinates roles and makes calls that actually play out in the physical world. Couldn't not enter when I read about it, felt like the first genuinely futuristic use case I'd come across. Draft is March 9 if anyone wants to throw their bot in and swarm up with me!

2

XxvivekxX

12d ago

This is crazy

1

iamSTRIDER11

12d ago

its insane! Makes me feel like I could be taking part in the next evolution of physical competition. Look at this... maybe our agents will swarm up together! https://augmentedgames.ai/

2

Continue this thread Continue this thread

Aggravating-Gap7783

12d ago

the meeting prep workflow is interesting - have you looked at self-hosting that part? with all the openclaw security stuff lately (exposed instances, leaked keys) piping your meeting recordings through fireflies adds another cloud dependency holding sensitive data. I built an open source meeting bot API (github.com/Vexa-ai/vexa) that does the same thing fireflies does but runs on your own infra. docker compose, ~4gb ram. could plug straight into your openclaw setup and keep the whole pipeline local.

2

XxvivekxX

12d ago

Already at 1.7k start damnWill defiantly check it out

Thank you for sharing

2

Continue this thread

BidWestern1056

12d ago

ive almost never found a situation where AIs draft communication responses to other humans that actually capture my voice and addresses their concerns in a way that I would want to in an email response. the act of writing certain emails is principally when some work actually gets done and worked through. email drafting writ large is just not a compelling enough use case because the ppl worth replying to are worth taking the time and those not worth replying to why waste AI tokens drafting?

likewise for coding, like setting off agents on tasks aimlessly is just not something i need as much cause then i have to spend more time reviewing the outputs

2

XxvivekxX

12d ago

What LLM are you using ?I believe if you give enough inputs of your writing AI can replicate the same style.

1

BidWestern1056

11d ago

i use many. maybe better now but the only way I've really gotten them to replicate style is fine tuning. for example none can replicate james joyce's style in finnegan's wake, so i made my own

https://huggingface.co/npc-worldwide/TinyTimV1

and then a version that can actually answer questions in the style

https://huggingface.co/npc-worldwide/tinytim-v2-1b-it

paper on it: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11607

anyway i write fiction and wanted a way to replicate joyce's style as like an i ching kind of interpretative exercise, and the tools for doing this all are in npcpy. I still need to make one for myself and am planning to make a few models for my specific tools npcsh and incognide and lavanzaro

1

Continue this thread Continue this thread

• Promoted

Hey Reddit, we fixed PDF parsing. You're welcome.

Founder-Awesome

12d ago

the escalation case with 'full context' is the hardest part to get right. most setups can triage and route fine, but when it escalates the human still has to open 4 tabs to understand what's happening. the value is in what arrives with the escalation, not that it escalated at all.

2

AutoModerator

12d ago

Thank you for your submission, for any questions regarding AI, please check out our wiki at https://www.reddit.com/r/ai_agents/wiki(this is currently in test and we are actively adding to the wiki)

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

Legitimate_Ad_3208

11d ago

thanks for the shoutout im glad agentmail has been helpful!

1

---

## View Post in

Tiếng Việt

Русский

简体中文

Français

हिन्दी

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Your Privacy Choices Accessibility Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.

Expand Navigation Collapse Navigation


id: 9db824473c2b
title: Launch HN: Canary (YC W26) – AI QA that understands your code
source_url: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47441629
source_platform: hackernews
author: Visweshyc
published_at: 2026-03-19T16:01:30+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-21T01:01:27.973151+00:00
scenario_type: 代码生成与审查
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["1842541e1ac9", "4a5ecb108ac0", "b84b9fe32ad7", "24717f8b983f", "997ebe8dd738"]
summary:
Canary是一个AI QA代理工具，能够理解代码库并自动为每个Pull Request生成和执行测试，检验真实用户工作流。该产品通过连接代码库、分析PR变更意图、生成端到端测试并在预览环境运行，最后在PR上评论测试结果和录屏，有效弥补了代码审查中缺乏真实用户行为测试的空白。

tools_used:
["Canary", "AI QA agents", "PR analysis", "Test generation", "Browser automation", "Regression testing"]

raw_content:
Launch HN: Canary (YC W26) – AI QA that understands your code

Hey HN! We&#x27;re Aakash and Viswesh, and we&#x27;re building Canary (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.runcanary.ai">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.runcanary.ai</a>). We build AI agents that read your codebase, figure out what a pull request actually changed, and generate and execute tests for every affected user workflow.<p>Aakash and I previously built AI coding tools at Windsurf, Cognition, and Google. AI tools were making every team faster at shipping, but nobody was testing real user behavior before merge. PRs got bigger, reviews still happened in file diffs, and changes that looked clean broke checkout, auth, and billing in production. We saw it firsthand. We started Canary to close that gap. Here&#x27;s how it works:<p>Canary starts by connecting to your codebase and understands how your app is built: routes, controllers, validation logic. You push a PR and Canary reads the diff, understands the intent behind the changes, then generates and runs tests against your preview app checking real user flows end to end. It comments directly on the PR with test results and recordings showing what changed and flagging anything that doesn&#x27;t behave as expected. You can also trigger specific user workflow tests via a PR comment.<p>Beyond PR testing, tests generated from the PR can be moved into regression suites. You can also create tests by just prompting what you want tested in plain English. Canary generates a full test suite from your codebase, schedules it, and runs it continuously. One of our construction tech customers had an invoicing flow where the amount due drifted from the original proposal total by ~$1,600. Canary caught the regression in their invoice flow before release.<p>This isn&#x27;t something a single family of foundation models can do on its own. QA spans across many modalities like source code, DOM&#x2F;ARIA, device emulators, visual verifications, analyzing screen recordings, network&#x2F;console logs, live browser state etc. for any single model to be specialized in. You also need custom browser fleets, user sessions, ephemeral environments, on-device farms and data seeding to run the tests reliably. On top of that, catching second-order effects of code changes requires a specialized harness that breaks the application in multiple possible ways across different types of users that a normal happy path testing flow wouldn&#x27;t.<p>To measure how well our purpose built QA agent works, we published QA-Bench v0, the first benchmark for code verification. Given a real PR, can an AI model identify every affected user workflow and produce relevant tests? We tested our purpose-built QA agent against GPT 5.4, Claude Code (Opus 4.6), and Sonnet 4.6 across 35 real PRs on Grafana, Mattermost, Cal.com, and Apache Superset on three dimensions: Relevance, Coverage, and Coherence. Coverage is where the gap was largest. Canary leads by 11 points over GPT 5.4, 18 over Claude Code, and 26 over Sonnet 4.6. For full methodology and per-repo breakdowns give our benchmark report a read: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.runcanary.ai&#x2F;blog&#x2F;qa-bench-v0">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.runcanary.ai&#x2F;blog&#x2F;qa-bench-v0</a><p>You can check out the product demo here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;NeD9g1do_BU" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;NeD9g1do_BU</a><p>We&#x27;d love feedback from anyone working on code verification or thinking about how to measure this differently.


id: 059dcd9ed4f2
title: My top 5 tools for my AI coding workflow : r/vibecoding - Reddit
source_url: https://www.reddit.com/r/vibecoding/comments/1o1g7ac/my_top_5_tools_for_my_ai_coding_workflow/
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2025-10-08T00:00:00+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-21T01:01:38.637408+00:00
scenario_type: 代码生成与审查
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["4a5ecb108ac0", "997ebe8dd738", "b84b9fe32380", "ef284a502c1b", "19e007cf2bb9"]
summary:
该文章介绍了一位资深工程师在AI辅助编码工作流中使用的5大工具,重点展示了Cursor、Zed、Github Desktop等代码编辑和版本控制工具的组合应用。通过整合多个AI模型(GPT Codex、Cheetah、Claude Code)和代码审查工具,形成了一套完整的从代码生成、编辑到审查的自动化工作流。

tools_used:
["Cursor", "Zed", "Github Desktop", "Claude Code", "Claude Code Github Action", "Zo Computer", "GPT Codex", "Cheetah", "CodeRabbit", "BugBot", "Warp.dev", "Droid by Factory AI"]

raw_content:
My top 5 tools for my AI coding workflow : r/vibecoding - Reddit

My top 5 tools for my AI coding workflow : r/vibecoding Skip to main content My top 5 tools for my AI coding workflow : r/vibecoding

Go to vibecoding

r/vibecoding 5mo ago

bgdotjpg

# My top 5 tools for my AI coding workflow

Disclaimer: I'm a seasoned engineer with over 10 years of experience (including Stripe 2015-2023) but I love vibing code nowadays. These are my favorite tools (including one that I built myself).

Cursor. This is still the king of AI code editors IMO. I've used it since they first released it. Definitely had some rough edges back then but these days it just keeps getting better. I like to use GPT Codex for generating plan documents and then I use Cheetah or another fast model for writing the code.

Zed. I use Zed as my terminal because the Cursor/VSCode terminal sucks. I sometimes run Claude Code inside Zed, they have a nice UX on top of Claude Code. I also use Zed whenever I want to edit code by hand because it's a way smoother experience.

Github Desktop. When you generate a ton of code with AI, it's important to keep good hygiene with version control and have a nice UI for reviewing code changes. Github Desktop is my first line of defense when it comes to review.

Claude Code Github Action. I prefer this to tools like CodeRabbit because it just a Github Workflow and it's easy to customize the way Claude Code runs to generate the review.

Zo Computer. This is my go-to tool for doing AI coding side projects, personal automations, and I also use it to research and generate plans for features in my larger projects. It's like an IDE on steroids, you can work with all kinds of files, not just code, and you can even host sites on it because it's a cloud VM under the hood.

Read more

Share

---

sherpa_dot_sh

5mo ago

Do you actually like Zed? I found it kind of weird. And not sure why I would use it over VSCode.

2

bgdotjpg

5mo ago

I love Zed, I find it really smooth as an editor and terminal compared to VSCode, but just my own preference

1

Continue this thread

_donvito

5mo ago

Cheetah in Cursor is crazy fast and good! I also use Cursor CLI sometimes.

I also use the ff. tools- warp.dev- Droid by Factory AI (newly launched)- Claude Code (but using GLM 4.6 model)- Repo Prompt

I use BugBot by Cursor and CodeRabbit for code reviews

2

bgdotjpg

5mo ago

ya cheetah is really impressive! i think it might be their own model

2

_donvito

5mo ago

what model do you think it is? I guess Gemini 3.0 Pro but they say I am wrong :D

1

Continue this thread Continue this thread

CodemachineCLI

5mo ago

You should switch to claude code and codex they’re a whole new game changer

2

Distinct_Aside5550

5mo ago

Nice workflow. Never heard about Zo Computer.

Mine is quite simple: Codex + Cursor IDE + Perfect.Codes(sometimes; when bugs are too complex)

2

Overall_Opposite2919

5mo ago

Which do you recommend a non engineer lean into first to expand beyond the Replit and vercels and start going more hands on with the code? I’ve done some cursor and vs code and feels like I can keep up, but curious if there is something more foundational (outside of just learning to code from scratch lol).

I currently ask gpt about my Replit code to learn its structure but far from understanding code

2

bgdotjpg

5mo ago

I honestly think Zo Computer is a great tool for this because you can create many different scratch coding projects, from simple scripts to websites, and ask the AI about them. I did build the product – but my goal is really to help more people "learn to fish" in the age of AI, not just vibe code.

2

Overall_Opposite2919

5mo ago

Love this thank you..

I vibe coded an app I really have been investing to make a reality (for my special needs brother living situation use case) but I used v0 and went far fast then got stuck and hired help. It’s been shaky and now I am confident enough to finish it myself but I find the more I learn the code and principles it’s so much easier to leverage the ai tools vs 100% relying on them

2

Continue this thread Continue this thread

felipeconqueso

5mo ago

my setup is pretty lean these days. coderabbit - handles PR reviews and catches messy AI commits.

then I pair it with GitHub Desktop for clean version tracking and diff reviews

zed - for quick manual edits when AI output needs a human touch. keeps the workflow fast and neat.

2

Leading-Basis4902

5mo ago

i got recommended kolega studio nd i just signed up today rn on trial nd its been sick ive been using lovable for selling websites as a side hustle but i might use kolega, worth throwing that name out there too

1

Leading-Basis4902

5mo ago

oh and rocket too, i use rocket its really good also

1

Continue this thread

TomatilloPutrid3939

5mo ago

Add https://github.com/samuelfaj/claudiomiro to your list. You gonna love it

1

Character-Weight1444

4mo ago

Great list! I’ve been using Cursor and Claude Code too both are solid. Curious if you’ve tried Intervo AI? I’ve found it helpful for brainstorming and quickly structuring short coding or automation ideas before jumping into actual implementation.

1

btkilo520

3mo ago

Another option is to use kilo.ai for the whole workflow. With Kilo, you can:

Build in the Kilo IDE extension, CLI, or with Cloud Agents using any of the 500+ supported AI models (including the latest from Claude, OpenAI, Google, etc.)

Accelerate with Autocomplete and Managed Indexing

Prototype with Kilo's App Builder

Get AI-powered feedback and suggestions with Kilo's Code Reviews

Deploy projects to a live URL with Kilo Deploy

This way, you can avoid the drag and friction of platform-switching, and access the entire flywheel of agentic engineering without leaving Kilo.

(Disclaimer: I work at Kilo, and I'm happy to help anyone who has questions!)

1

---

## View Post in

हिन्दी

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Your Privacy Choices Accessibility Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.

Expand Navigation Collapse Navigation


id: 832ef59b9a0c
title: Show HN: I made an email app inspired by Arc browser
source_url: https://demo.define.app
source_platform: hackernews
author: johndamaia
published_at: 2026-03-20T18:06:20+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-21T01:01:47.327143+00:00
scenario_type: 创意内容生产
tools_used: ["Arc browser", "Gmail", "Cursor", "AI agents"]
novelty: new
similar_to_ids: []
summary:
开发者创建了一个受Arc浏览器启发的电子邮件应用原型，整合了现代UI设计和AI助手功能来管理邮件、日历和文件。这个项目展示了将成熟的浏览器UX模式应用于电子邮件领域的创意探索，但目前仅是概念验证阶段，实际工作流价值和本地数据集成程度有限。

raw_content:
Show HN: I made an email app inspired by Arc browser

Email is one of those tools we check daily but its underlying experience didn’t evolve much. I use Gmail, as probably most of you reading this.<p>The Arc browser brought joy and taste to browsing the web. Cursor created a new UX with agents ready to work for you in a handy right panel.<p>I use these three tools every day. Since Arc was acquired by Atlassian, I’ve been wondering: what if I built a new interface that applied Arc’s UX to email rather than browser tabs, while making AI agents easily available to help manage emails, events, and files?<p>I built a frontend PoC to showcase the idea.<p>Try it: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;demo.define.app" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;demo.define.app</a><p>I’m not sure about it though... Is it worth continuing to explore this idea?


id: 61a2b99fc903
title: What's your actual AI coding workflow? : r/vibecoding - Reddit
source_url: https://www.reddit.com/r/vibecoding/comments/1nyzb5e/whats_your_actual_ai_coding_workflow/
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2025-10-05T00:00:00+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-21T01:01:59.053835+00:00
scenario_type: 工作流自动化
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["4a8b3582430c", "e1859e355e0c", "220851dd1119", "4188cb874081"]
summary:
讨论如何构建AI辅助编程的实际工作流程，包括多个开发者分享的最佳实践。核心模式是先用AI生成详细的markdown计划文档，再在IDE中逐步实现、测试和审查，形成人工审核与AI生成代码的二层验证系统，提高输出质量和一致性。

tools_used:
["Claude Code", "Cursor IDE", "Perplexity AI", "ChatGPT", "Lovable", "VS Code", "Kilo Code", "Augment Code"]

raw_content:
What's your actual AI coding workflow? : r/vibecoding - Reddit

What’s your actual AI coding workflow? : r/vibecoding Skip to main content What’s your actual AI coding workflow? : r/vibecoding

Go to vibecoding

r/vibecoding 6mo ago

spiritualManager5

# What’s your actual AI coding workflow?

What’s your favorite setup for vibecoding (not just tools)?

Not asking which CLI tools exist (Codex, Claude Code, etc.), but what kind of systems or workflows you’ve built around them.

Have you built your own slash commands, internal agents, or frameworks to manage tasks? How do you handle issues like:

The AI doing too much or less

Not following internal docs or coding standards

Keeping outputs consistent

I tried frameworks like agent.os, but they didn’t quite satisfy me.

I’m thinking about a setup where one AI/Agent/Task acts as a junior dev and another reviews its work like a senior in a way like i would review it.

Curious what others are doing to make their AI coding setups actually usable long-term.

Read more

Share

---

• Promoted

Put gold on your radar. Stand a chance to win 200g gold when you invest S$3,888+ into Syfe Managed Portfolios or Brokerage.

---

Character-Example-21

6mo ago

I create a detailed and step-by-step plan in markdown formatting. I do this outside of my IDE. Lots of talk, suggestions, edge cases, possible problems and security improvements.

Then I get a final .md file with the steps and feed this .md to my Cursor IDE.

Inside Cursor I create a branch, implement step-by-step, test and review.

Has been much better.

17

Yablan

5mo ago

Yep. Me too. I usually first have a lengthy chat in Perplexity AI to help me with the initial project master document. Feature ideas, step by step suggestions, MVP / order of things, todo list, general AI prompt instructions. Back and forth, until It's good enough to get started. And then save it as the project README.

And then create the root directory of the project, and the README. And I initialize all my Cursor conversations with that document. And I have Cursor constantly reading AND updating it as the project goes on.

So that file is the actual brain of the project.

2

fullysickwicked

5mo ago

Perplexity! This is the first I'm hearing people use for this - what are you finding the benefits to be?

3

1 more reply

Continue this thread Continue this thread 3 more replies

Continue this thread

Silly-Heat-1229

6mo ago

I keep it straightforward: Lovable for quick UI drafts, ChatGPT/Perplexity for research and ideas. Then I ship in VS Code with Kilo Code, Architect to sketch the plan, Orchestrator to split tasks, Code/Debug to land tiny, reviewable diffs with checkpoints. I use my own API keys and pay per use; liked it so much I ended up helping the team after being a power user.

5

JFerzt

6mo ago

Been using Augment Code for the past few months on a proprietary enterprise codebase (think 200+ microservices, thousands of files, the kind of mess that makes junior devs weep). Here's the thing nobody tells you about "vibe coding" at scale - most tools completely fall apart once your project exceeds toy app territory.

Cursor? Great for prototypes. Claude? Wonderful for single-file problems. But try pointing them at a real enterprise repo and watch them hallucinate dependencies that don't exist or suggest changes that break 47 other services because they have zero idea how your actual architecture works.

Augment's context engine is what makes the difference. It actually understands large codebases ... pulls in relevant files, knows about your internal libraries, integrates with your docs. The agent can work autonomously across multiple files, run terminal commands (with approval if you're paranoid like me), and open PRs that don't require you to rewrite half of it.

The workflow is dead simple: give it a task, let the agent plan it out, review the changes, ship. No copying and pasting context between windows. No "but I already told you about this file 3 prompts ago." It just... knows.

Is it perfect? No. Nothing is. But for industrial-scale projects where context actually matters and you can't afford to babysit an AI through every dependency, it's the only tool I've found that doesn't actively waste my time.

The MCP support and IDE integrations (VSCode, JetBrains, even Vim for the masochists) mean it fits into whatever workflow you already have instead of forcing you to adapt to its limitations.

If your "vibe coding" involves anything larger than a weekend project, try something built for actual scale.

4

5 more replies

Continue this thread

kamikazikarl

6mo ago

Extreme planning in my choice AI chat

developer series of markdown files with an action plan, database requirements, communication requirements (API, web hooks, sockets, etc)

UI guidelines, views, authentication expectations,

claude code reading these docs and determine an execution plan: UI-first with mock data, then wire up the API and socket after final UI approval

several refactoring passes as the UI and API code is being developed to ensure my structural rules are followed

I try not to interrupt as it works on each phase of tbe build since that tends to introduce breaks and confusion for the AI, but generally, if you've got a clear action plan for MVP and final product, it's pretty good about handling each phase of the build. I only ever have problems with very complex UI concepts and edge cases. The API and websocket implements are never a problem.

2

1 more reply

Continue this thread

Elegant_Gas_740

4mo ago

I had the same issue trying to organize AI workflows until I started using Blink.new It’s kind of like having your junior + senior dev setup built in it writes, reviews, and deploys full-stack apps all in one place. No need to chain multiple agents or frameworks. It keeps everything consistent, especially for backend/auth tasks that usually go off the rails with other tools.

2

• Promoted

Work is broken. It's time you had a single source for everything.

cryptoviksant

6mo ago

Check this out https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/s/KE51Ujro5Z

Hope it’s useful

1

Distinct_Aside5550

5mo ago

My AI coding workflow is this:

- Plan a bunch of things initially with GPT-5 thinking

- May be make a PRD document of the app/feature I wanna build

- Convert into PRD.md, add to my cursor IDE

- Then again I try to ask OpenAI codex or Claude Code, to review my PRD and suggest any changes

- Make a final PRD

- Work on basic things first and then proceeding to deploy complex stuff

- In the end, If I really get stuck, then perfect.codes as a platform to help me fix some complexities.

0

Brave-e

6mo ago

Here’s how I usually tackle it: I start by nailing down the problem and breaking it into bite-sized tasks. Then, I write a clear prompt that spells out the role I want the AI to play,like a backend developer or UI expert,along with the exact input and output formats and any rules it needs to follow. Getting all that upfront really helps the AI deliver accurate code right away, so I don’t have to go back and forth a bunch. I also keep my IDE and project files open to test and tweak things quickly. Hope that’s helpful!

1

eCappaOnReddit

6mo ago

A desk and a keyboard. And Mad framework too ;)

1

4 more replies

Continue this thread

Groson

6mo ago

1 Don't use AI 2 Think using my brain and education to create something without hidden bugs

1

tutsep

5mo ago

Still in denial on what's about to come

3

1 more reply

Continue this thread Continue this thread

vuongagiflow

6mo ago

There are different stages when vibecode. Concept to MVP stage, keep it simple, claude.md and mcp to get the job done (context7, playwright). Post MVP - emhancement, refractoring the code to have more structured (better folder organization, stadardize coding pattern). Scaling phase (adding another developer, creating another app), custom instructions per folder/files, custom mcp. I wrote a blogpost about this just yesterday https://agiflow.io/blog/toward-scalable-coding-with-ai-agent-better-scaffolding-approach. Vibing from last year til now so went through quite rocky exp.

1

• Promoted

Tired of benchmaxxed models ?

morihacky

6mo ago

I recently just posted about my workflow in another reddit post (x-sharing here again)

tldr:

Context: AGENTS.md, tooling (i use a`Makefile`), MCPs

Prompt: standard structure + /commands all the way

Chunking: similar to what others mention, doing in batches was the biggest improvement.

Post has more details!

1

2 more replies

Continue this thread

ivan_m21

6mo ago

Hey awesome thread. Loving reading what people are saying, will share mine as well.So firstly, since we are talking about vibe-coding. I have to say that I am splitting my codebases into two categories:

Codebases that I've written myself, and I know very well (barely used agentic stuff on them).

Codebases that are vibecoded and I have an idea of what they are.

For the first case, honestly I am too scared to use agents, because I feel like I get disconnected from the codebase way too fast and things get out of control. So for those I usually use the "Edit" functionality in VSCode and review everything carefully or write the code myself.

For the vibecoded codebase, I used to just "brute force" the agent to make something which works, however if one has to maintain the codebase for a longer period, I think understanding has hit a bottleneck. That is why I have built myself a quick on-boarding engine called CodeBoarding (https://github.com/CodeBoarding/CodeBoarding, would love ot hear what you think on this as an idea). It creates a diagram representation so that I can understand what is what and what is where, this way I can skip the painful part of reading the tons of code written by the agent but provide valuable context which then allows me to again be in control and understand what is going on and be more precise in my asks from the agent.

I would love to see what others have to say about this exponential codebase growth with the human knowledge of it taking a step back, to me I always have found that I've reached a tipping point where I need to spend the extra time to understand what was generated in order to continue further.

1

Quack66

6mo ago

GLM coding plan+ Claude Code with BMAD

1

2 more replies

Continue this thread

llmobsguy

6mo ago

I do 3 things:

Logs: must be local filesystem. No bogus MCP and any remote / network or container stuffs - Way too slow and prone to different errors.

Docs: Add docs ONLY need for specific features I am working on.

Unit Tests: I tell Cursor or Copilot to run tests on its own and report back. I must control the tests and what they do.

I recorded a video here: https://youtu.be/omZsHoKFG5M

Also, I separate out development on:

UX only (totally new window).

API only (new environment).

Bug fix (each bug per chat).

I commit on every successful thing implemented and I branch aggressively.

1

FormalFix9019

6mo ago

I am using BMAD. A bit difficult to understand initially but once you really get it, you're not going to use other method. You can easily work between different platform mid project without losng any progress or context. It stays in BMAD docs.

1

Ecstatic-Junket2196

6mo ago

i’ve been experimenting with a similar setup, using traycer/chatgpt as the “planner” to break tasks down first, then cursor or claude code hehe

1

searchableguy

6mo ago

Treat the model like a junior dev behind gates. Every change flows through the same pipeline a human would.

I keep a`tasks/.yaml` with goal, acceptance tests, allowed files, and a change budget. Slash commands in the IDE trigger prompt templates:`/spec` writes a brief spec,`/plan` lists steps,`/patch` asks for a minimal diff to specific files,`/tests` generates unit tests first,`/risk` runs a review prompt over the diff.

The junior pass only produces a patch, never whole files. I cap diffs to N lines and reject anything outside`WRITE_SCOPE`. That stops “doing too much” and forces small, reviewable edits.

Consistency comes from a tiny codebook in repo:`docs/standards.md`,`docs/api_contracts.md`, and a snippet of idiomatic code. Every prompt includes those and requires citations to the exact section it followed. If there is no citation, the patch fails the gate.

A senior pass reviews the diff against standards and docs, not the whole repo. It must list risks, missing tests, and performance notes. Only after tests, lint, and type checks pass do I let it open a PR using a template that forces Why, Alternatives, Risks, and Docs Updated.

Models rotate by task. Small model for scaffolds and refactors, bigger model only for thorny logic. Everything is logged and replayable so I can reproduce a run later. This keeps outputs tight, on style, and easy to maintain.

1

ekilibrus

6mo ago

I'm actually building my own tool to help me create and visualize the architecture of the system before I even build it. www.applifique.com

1

Ghostinheven

6mo ago

For me the best setup is to treat AI like a small dev team. One agent works like a junior dev that writes or updates code, and then I review it with another session like a senior. I keep a CLAUDE.md or similar doc for standards and update it often. Planning in advance and breaking tasks into smaller steps makes a huge difference. I’ve also found Traycer really useful for workflows and planning, and for some tasks its code generation worked better than Cursor, Claude Opus, or even Codex. The consistency comes more from how you structure your process than the tool you pick.

1

Shizuka-8435

6mo ago

I usually set up one AI to act like a junior dev that writes code and another to review it like a senior, checking against docs and standards. I keep a simple memory file with key project decisions so the AI stays consistent and use shortcuts or slash commands for common tasks. Traycer helps with planning, Codex handles coding, and other tools fill in different tasks. The flow is always AI drafts, I review and run tests, then let the AI fix issues CI points out, which keeps things fast but controlled.

1

andrewderjack

5mo ago

I run a junior–senior agent setup:

Junior agent writes code from a ticket using a repo index + docs RAG.

Senior agent reviews diffs only, checking style, tests, and risks.

Workflow:/spec → /plan → /impl → /review → merge if green.

Guardrails:

Patch-only edits, no full rewrites.

Must propose tests first.

Must cite internal docs or style rules.

Lint, typecheck, and CI gates before merge.

Keeps outputs consistent, prevents over-generation, and mimics real dev hierarchy.

1

1 more reply

Continue this thread

---

## View Post in

Français

Português (Brasil)

हिन्दी

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Accessibility Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.

Expand Navigation Collapse Navigation


id: 088667f1fc0e
title: Launch HN: Sitefire (YC W26) – Automating actions to improve AI visibility
source_url: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47457472
source_platform: hackernews
author: vincko
published_at: 2026-03-20T17:05:38+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-21T01:02:09.188928+00:00
scenario_type: 商业流程自动化
tools_used: ["ChatGPT", "Gemini", "Google AI Mode", "CMS", "Google Analytics", "Slack", "Claude"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["2f043903e426", "d643c0c3dbe7", "954dc3a3a586"]
summary:
Sitefire是一个自动化平台，通过监测AI搜索引擎的查询、分析来源页面排名，并自动生成或优化网站内容来提升品牌在AI搜索中的可见性。该解决方案整合了多个AI模型、CMS系统和数据分析工具，实现了从监测、诊断到内容优化的完整自动化工作流。

raw_content:
Launch HN: Sitefire (YC W26) – Automating actions to improve AI visibility

Hi HN! We&#x27;re Vincent and Jochen from sitefire (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sitefire.ai">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sitefire.ai</a>). Our platform makes it easy for brands to improve their visibility in AI search.<p>We’ve been working together for years and have backgrounds in RL&#x2F;optimization at Stanford and software engineering. We came to this idea after speaking with marketing teams who were seeing declining traffic due to Google’s AI Overviews and didn’t know what to do.<p>This space can feel esoteric. Many case studies, few actual studies. Constant battle against myths (e.g. you need a llms.txt vs. you don&#x27;t need a llms.txt) and &quot;GEO hacks&quot;. We try to be more data-driven. And we try to be more bold and build a system that not only monitors, but actually improves traffic from AI search.<p>While Google performs a single search, AI search engines expand the user prompt into 3-10 fan-out queries. The sourced pages are ranked using a classified algorithm similar to Reciprocal Rank Fusion (RFF). Finally, the LLMs skim the pages and decide what snippets to cite. Our goal is making sure brands have the right content that makes it through this funnel.<p>Here is how sitefire works:<p>- The user defines a set of prompts they want to monitor. These are synthetic prompts - we generate them based on SEO keywords and their monthly search volume.<p>- We submit these prompts to ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Mode, etc. on a daily basis and capture the answers. We extract fan-out queries, sourced pages, citations, and brand mentions.<p>- For each topic, our agents analyze which web pages are sourced and cited the most, and why. They also consider similar pages that you already have.<p>- Based on the diagnosis, our content agents draft improvements or create new pages, and push them directly to the client’s CMS.<p>- We integrate with the client’s network logs and Google Analytics to monitor the increase in AI bot requests and human referrals to their page.<p>This system is continuously updated, so it always shows which content works, and how to adapt the existing sitemap. For one client that used sitefire to optimize their blog, the AI-optimized articles increased their AI bot requests from ~200&#x2F;day to ~570&#x2F;day within ten days.<p>A risk we recognize is that AI-generated content is filling brands’ websites with slop. Whilst it’s still early days and we don’t claim to have figured everything out yet, our intention is to mitigate this by focusing the content on specific, unique information: real product capabilities, real pricing, honest comparisons. The clients still review every page before it goes live, so they can ensure the content is true to their brand.<p>Some clients use our platform themselves. For others we act more like an agency, automating steps as we go. The goal is for sitefire to run mostly on its own, with clients approving changes via Slack, Claude or their CMS.<p>Here&#x27;s a video demo: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;screen.studio&#x2F;share&#x2F;fw7VQQak" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;screen.studio&#x2F;share&#x2F;fw7VQQak</a><p>If you&#x27;d like to try what we&#x27;ve built so far, sign up at <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sitefire.ai">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sitefire.ai</a>.


id: 34bb15285d1f
title: I thought OpenClaw would replace my workflow. After 7 ... - Reddit
source_url: https://www.reddit.com/r/aiagents/comments/1rdk5da/i_thought_openclaw_would_replace_my_workflow/
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2026-02-24T00:00:00+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-22T01:00:37.389304+00:00
scenario_type: 工作流自动化
tools_used: ["OpenClaw", "scheduling tools"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["0ed02b58229f", "a4713fb9eb43", "2587854ae526", "3d01ae2ffc82", "53435200c5ef"]
summary:
用户测试OpenClaw自动化代理一周后放弃使用，发现配置时间过长且实际收益有限。虽然该工具提供内存、循环和集成等功能，但用户认为手动控制和简单提示词比复杂的自动化代理更有价值，质疑是否真有人在实际工作流中持续使用此类工具。

raw_content:
I thought OpenClaw would replace my workflow. After 7 ... - Reddit

I thought OpenClaw would replace my workflow. After 7 days, I stopped using it. : r/aiagents Skip to main content I thought OpenClaw would replace my workflow. After 7 days, I stopped using it. : r/aiagents

Go to aiagents

r/aiagents 23d ago

Slight_Republic_4242

# I thought OpenClaw would replace my workflow. After 7 days, I stopped using it.

I tested OpenClaw for about a week. At first, I was honestly very excited because everyone was talking about autonomous AI agents replacing normal workflows. It has cool features like memory, loops, agents, and integrations, so on paper, it sounds powerful.

But after actually using it daily, I felt it didn’t add much practical value for me. I ended up spending more time configuring things than getting real output. Instead of simplifying work, sometimes it actually made things feel more complicated.

About the “Memory” feature, automatic memory sounds good, but I personally prefer manual control. When memory automatically saves everything, it can clutter the context with information I don’t really need. I like deciding what should be remembered.

Same with cron jobs. Scheduled automation is useful, but I already use simple scheduling tools for that. Plus, sometimes I want to run things on demand instead of on a fixed schedule.

For me, the real strength is not the agent itself but the skills, workflows, and prompts we build. Tools can help, but skills matter way more.

Curious to know, are people actually using OpenClaw regularly in real workflows, or are we just excited because “autonomous AI agent” sounds impressive?

Read more

Share

---

• Promoted

Connect with customers through email, SMS, and social in one unified platform. Get started with Mailchimp today.

---

BC_MARO

23d ago

That experience makes sense. The people getting real value from it usually have one specific job they want automated (monitoring inbox, drafts, a research loop) rather than trying to replace a whole workflow, and the upfront config investment to get there is pretty real.

7

cleverbit1

22d ago

I asked my agents if I’d benefit from running open claw and they said nah because I already had a pretty sophisticated setup.

My main curiosity was around people saying they leave agents running all the time doing stuff. I’m like bro what are you leaving running unsupervised? I work with AI 24/7 and it’s literally a loop of me specifying instructions, it running for like 90s and then me verifying. I get like 40x done in a day than I used to. But how are you doing things unsupervised? All I can guess is they’re using it wrong.

6

Glad_Appearance_8190

23d ago

actually i’ve felt this too...on paper autonomous agents sound great, but in practice you end up managing the tool more than the work. auto memory especially can get messy fast...a tight workflow + good prompts usually beats a “smart” agent you have to babysit. curious if anyone’s actually using it daily without constant tweaking.

5

manjit-johal

22d ago

Many users find that open-source options like OpenClaw don't quite match the deep integration and custom optimization that make the native Claude experience so smooth. It’s smart to think of these tools as specialized extensions for local data privacy, rather than expecting them to replace a high-performance cloud setup fully.

4

Stock_Helicopter_260

22d ago

Yep, that’s the state we’re at right now. It doesn’t work out of box for everything. Implementation pains are why the job losses are lagging but capability after the implementation pains are there.

It’ll get there.

3

MaterialMouse4857

22d ago

Clawdbot's intelligence comes from context injection — every API call loads your full workspace (SOUL, USER, MEMORY...) into the prompt. A 30-minute heartbeat mechanism and input:output ratios of 232:1+ quietly inflate costs with no default visibility. This post explains 3 hidden cost mechanisms and walks you through installing a /billing dashboard so you can see exactly what you're paying for with a single Telegram command

https://autonow.vn/en/clawdbot-billing-dashboard

4

Kakashi201119997

22d ago

Openclaw is i think if is jobby project that is why you feel like that

2

• Promoted

20+ years, millions of successful websites, and the best support team in the industry. Rated 4.9/5 on Trustpilot. Now imagine that same level of care behind your online store. That's SiteGround Ecommerce - the easiest way to start selling online, backed by a name you can count on.

HarjjotSinghh

22d ago

openclaw's potential looks amazing

2

Murder_1337

22d ago

How is this different from n8n

0

mentalFee420

22d ago

n8n is so 2025, 2026 is all about claws, at least the first quarter till we move to next shiny thing,

7

Murder_1337

22d ago

Understood, they are both workflow tools?

2

1 more reply

Continue this thread Continue this thread

UnluckyPhilosophy185

22d ago

Lobsters are involved

3

Continue this thread

trynagrub

22d ago

yep I gave it over a month, spent at least an hour each day tweaking, configuring, fixing, etc… but I decided I’m done for now…not worth the time it takes to setup/ babysit … let alone money, security, etc… made a video on it

1

Creamy-And-Crowded

22d ago

OpenClaw's usefulness grows with security.

I have built an OpenClaw integration on pic-standard that enforces provenance & intent contracts on OpenClaw tool calls via the hook API, highly limiting prompt injection and other malaware attempts.

How It Works

The plugin uses three hooks to gate, contextualize, and audit tool calls:

| Hook | Event | Priority | Purpose |

|--------------|----------------------|----------|--------------------------------------------|

| `pic-gate` | `before_tool_call` | 100 | Verify `__pic` proposals — block or allow |

| `pic-init` | `before_agent_start` | 50 | Inject PIC awareness into the session |

| `pic-audit` | `tool_result_persist`| 200 | Log structured audit records |

All verification happens via the PIC HTTP bridge, a Python stdlib server that wraps the existing `evaluate_pic_for_tool_call()` pipeline.

It's open source. If interested here is the repo: https://github.com/madeinplutofabio/pic-standard

1

• Promoted

Even ChatGPT recommends Hicomply for compliance automation

CartographerFeisty66

21d ago

I'm part of the beta group at Get EA https://www.getea.ai/ which is the same but for companies.I like it a ton but it really serves only admin tasks like scheduling and calendar management, less b2c functions like connecting it to my smart home

1

PEACENFORCER

21d ago

It's interesting to see the evolving landscape of AI tools and workflows. Each has its strengths and weaknesses, and it’s crucial to assess what aligns best with personal or team needs. Having a mix of tools can often lead to a more optimized and flexible approach. Experimenting with various setups may uncover the best fit!

1

Survivor4054

19d ago

I went thru almost the same and i realize was better using my own solution: mynown dockerimage that calls claudecode agent in cli and connects a telegram bot and empower it using MCPs to my tools needed One for trading - tradingview One for financial management- firefly3 One for.homelab automation And thats it I control what access they should have and all does what i need to

1

Kimu_Evans

15d ago

I had almost the same experience. On paper OpenClaw looks powerful but once you try to plug it into real client workflows you spend more time wiring edge cases than shipping value. Autonomy is cool until you need reliability

1

Nancyt_Thomas

15d ago

Most agent frameworks are dev playgrounds not production systems. The only agents that have actually worked for us are narrow scoped and tied to one concrete business outcome like reducing response time or qualifying inbound leads

1

Continue this thread

Christi_Norris

15d ago

I thought OpenClaw would replace my workflow. After 7 days, I stopped using it.

1

Debrat_Smith

15d ago

The pattern I keep seeing is people trying to replace the workflow instead of tightening it. Full autonomy is fragile. Constrained augmentation is durable

2

Continue this thread

---

## View Post in

日本語

Tiếng Việt

Português (Brasil)

Français

Русский

繁體中文

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Accessibility Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.

Expand Navigation Collapse Navigation

Let us know your cookie preferences

Reddit uses cookies and similar technologies to:

- Monitor site usage and performance metrics
- Prevent fraud and abuse
- Keep the website operational and running properly

If you choose “Accept All” we’ll also use cookies to:

- Develop and improve new features and services
- Measure the performance of ads
- Personalize your recommendations and ads

If you choose “Reject Optional Cookies” we won’t use cookies for these additional uses. You can update your cookie preference from your settings.

Learn more about how Reddit uses cookies.

Accept All Reject Optional Cookies


id: f244b0717e73
title: MacBook M5 Pro and Qwen3.5 = Local AI Security System
source_url: https://www.sharpai.org/benchmark/
source_platform: hackernews
author: aegis_camera
published_at: 2026-03-20T16:41:42+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-22T01:00:46.812692+00:00
scenario_type: 终端与CLI增强
tools_used: ["MacBook M5 Pro", "Qwen3.5"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["3d3ea81a8dfe", "77b4be38215d", "84c9721be3eb", "0b5c4741d1c1", "7c94eb734f17"]
raw_content: MacBook M5 Pro and Qwen3.5 = Local AI Security System
summary:
该方案利用MacBook M5 Pro的本地计算能力与Qwen3.5大语言模型结合，构建一个离线运行的本地AI安全系统。通过在本地设备上部署和运行AI模型，避免了将敏感安全数据上传到云端的隐私风险，具有较好的实用价值。


id: 196655b39c7c
title: Show HN: Red Grid Link – peer-to-peer team tracking over Bluetooth, no servers
source_url: https://github.com/RedGridTactical/RedGridLink
source_platform: hackernews
author: redgridtactical
published_at: 2026-03-20T22:25:51+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-22T01:01:01.870781+00:00
scenario_type: 本地数据集成
novelty: new
similar_to_ids: []
summary:
Red Grid Link是一个iOS应用，通过蓝牙实现点对点的团队位置追踪，无需服务器或网络连接，特别适合无蜂窝信号的野外活动。核心创新在于采用CRDT同步层确保BLE连接不稳定情况下的可靠数据同步，并集成端到端加密和离线地形图功能，为户外团队协调提供了低成本高可靠的解决方案。

tools_used:
["Red Grid Link", "Bluetooth", "CRDT sync", "AES-256-GCM encryption", "ECDH P-256", "offline topo maps", "MGRS grid coordinates"]

raw_content:
Show HN: Red Grid Link – peer-to-peer team tracking over Bluetooth, no servers

I go on a lot of backcountry trips where I barely get cell service. If my group splits, nobody knows knows where anyone is until you regroup at camp or at your destination. You can buy Garmin radios or try to set up an ATAK, but ATAK is Android-only and assumes you have a TAK Server running somewhere to make use of all of the functionality. Cool tools themselves, but expensive to set up correctly. I just wanted two iPhones to share their location directly over Bluetooth when cell coverage was lacking.<p>Red Grid Link does that. Start a session, and anyone nearby running the app shows up on your offline map. When they walk out of range their marker stays as a &quot;ghost&quot; that slowly fades.<p>The hard part was making sync reliable over BLE. The connections drop all the time. Someone turns a corner, walks behind a vehicle, whatever. I built a CRDT sync layer (LWW Register + G-Counter) so there&#x27;s never merge conflicts. Each update is just under 200 bytes (from what I have tested so far). When a user&#x2F;teammate disappears the app does exponential backoff from 2 to 30 seconds before giving up and marking them as a ghost.<p>Everything is encrypted (AES-256-GCM, ECDH P-256 key exchange per peer pair). Sessions can require a PIN or QR code to join. It also offers offline topo maps with MGRS grid coordinates, same system as in my other app, Red Grid MGRS.<p>The app is free, and I&#x27;m looking for some honest feedback from other real-world users. Let me know if you have any questions!


id: ba99de7bfc09
title: Show HN: AI SDLC Scaffold, repo template for AI-assisted software development
source_url: https://github.com/pangon/ai-sdlc-scaffold/
source_platform: hackernews
author: pangon
published_at: 2026-03-21T12:43:09+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-22T01:01:33.042614+00:00
scenario_type: 代码生成与审查
tools_used: ["Claude Code", "AI coding agents", "Repository template", "Markdown documentation"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["1842541e1ac9", "4a5ecb108ac0", "861656b00eb7", "997ebe8dd738", "8d0142693489"]
summary:
这是一个为AI辅助软件开发设计的开源仓库模板,通过结构化的SDLC工作流(包括目标、用户故事、需求、架构决策等前置阶段)来优化AI代码生成的效果。该方案采用分层指导文件、可按需加载的技能模块和结构化项目产物的架构,提高了上下文窗口效率并确保跨会话的决策可追溯性。

raw_content:
Show HN: AI SDLC Scaffold, repo template for AI-assisted software development

I built an open-source repo template that brings structure to AI-assisted software development, starting from the pre-coding phases: objectives, user stories, requirements, architecture decisions.<p>It&#x27;s designed around Claude Code but the ideas are tool-agnostic. I&#x27;ve been a computer science researcher and full-stack software engineer for 25 years, working mainly in startups. I&#x27;ve been using this approach on my personal projects for a while, then, when I decided to package it up as scaffold for more easy reuse, I figured it might be useful to others too. I published it under Apache 2.0, fork it and make it yours.<p>You can easily try it out: follow the instructions in the README to start using it.<p>The problem it solves:<p>AI coding agents are great at writing code, but they work much better when they have clear context about what to build and why. Most projects jump straight to implementation. This scaffold provides a structured workflow for the pre-coding phases, and organizes the output so that agents can navigate it efficiently across sessions.<p>How it works:<p>Everything lives in the repo alongside source code. The AI guidance is split into three layers, each optimized for context-window usage:<p>1. Instruction files (CLAUDE.md, CLAUDE.&lt;phase&gt;.md): always loaded, kept small. They are organized hierarchically, describe repo structure, maintain artifact indexes, and define cross-phase rules like traceability invariants.<p>2. Skills (.claude&#x2F;skills&#x2F;SDLC-*): loaded on demand. Step-by-step procedures for each SDLC activity: eliciting requirements, gap analysis, drafting architecture, decomposing into components, planning tasks, implementation.<p>3. Project artifacts: structured markdown files that accumulate as work progresses: stakeholders, goals, user stories, requirements, assumptions, constraints, decisions, architecture, data model, API design, task tracking. Accessed selectively through indexes.<p>This separation matters because instruction files stay in the context window permanently and must be lean, skills can be detailed since they&#x27;re loaded only when invoked, and artifacts scale with the project but are navigated via indexed tables rather than read in full.<p>Key design choices:<p>Context-window efficiency: artifact collections use markdown index tables (one-line description and trigger conditions) so the agent can locate what it needs without reading everything.<p>Decision capture: decisions made during AI reasoning and human feedback are persisted as a structured artifact, to make them reviewable, traceable, and consistently applied across sessions.<p>Waterfall-ish flow: sequential phases with defined outputs. Tedious for human teams, but AI agents don&#x27;t mind the overhead, and the explicit structure prevents the unconstrained &quot;just start vibecoding&quot; failure mode.<p>How I use it:<p>Short, focused sessions. Each session invokes one skill, produces its output, and ends. The knowledge organization means the next session picks up without losing context. I&#x27;ve found that free-form prompting between skills is usually a sign the workflow is missing a piece.<p>Current limitations:<p>I haven&#x27;t found a good way to integrate Figma MCP for importing existing UI&#x2F;UX designs into the workflow. Suggestions welcome.<p>Feedback, criticism, and contributions are very welcome!


id: 8ba92212f680
title: Show HN: LiteParse, a fast open-source document parser for AI agents
source_url: https://github.com/run-llama/liteparse
source_platform: hackernews
author: freezed8
published_at: 2026-03-20T16:43:09+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-22T01:01:50.518783+00:00
scenario_type: 本地数据集成
tools_used: ["LiteParse", "Claude Code", "Cursor", "OpenClaw", "Windsurf"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["3c227580c0d5", "4bd61f83571a", "39d6b08b7043", "85b23a6c94bb", "5ff4bf30ae94"]
summary:
LiteParse是一个开源文档解析器，提供高质量的空间文本解析和边界框功能，无需GPU即可在本地运行。它支持PDF、Office文档、图片等多种格式，可作为40多个AI代理的一行安装技能，显著提升文档处理效率和准确性。

raw_content:
Show HN: LiteParse, a fast open-source document parser for AI agents

LiteParse is an open-source (Apache 2.0) document parser that provides high-quality spatial text parsing with bounding boxes. It does not depend on local or frontier VLMs.<p>Because it does not require GPUs, liteparse can be run on any machine, and process a few hundred pages of documents in seconds. It offers higher accuracy than similar tools like PyPDF, PyMuPDF, MarkItDown.<p>It supports a variety of file formats - PDFs, Office documents, images. It can be one-line installed as a skill for 40+ different AI agents, including Claude Code, Cursor, OpenClaw, Windsurf, and more.


id: 2579f1fd2302
title: Newbie: best workflow for developing new software : r/ClaudeAI
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2026-01-21T00:00:00+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-22T01:02:38.870632+00:00
scenario_type: 代码生成与审查
tools_used: ["Claude Pro", "Claude Code", "Claude CoWork", "Supabase", "blink.new"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["1842541e1ac9", "4a5ecb108ac0", "997ebe8dd738", "c308aabe6a31", "8d0142693489"]
summary:
非技术背景用户寻求使用Claude开发内部通信门户和报告仪表板的最佳工作流程，但遇到了聊天记忆限制问题。社区建议使用Claude Code、Claude CoWork等工具以及Supabase、blink.new等平台来解决长期项目的连续性和数据库管理问题。

source_url:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1qim6rw/newbie_best_workflow_for_developing_new_software/

raw_content:
Newbie: best workflow for developing new software : r/ClaudeAI

Newbie: best workflow for developing new software : r/ClaudeAI Skip to main content Newbie: best workflow for developing new software : r/ClaudeAI

Go to ClaudeAI

r/ClaudeAI 2mo ago

boiler1560

# Newbie: best workflow for developing new software

Hello! I do not have a technical background. I want to make a communication portal for my internal company between departments with reporting dashboards pulling in data from our erp.

I was working on this with Claude, I have pro plan, and have 2 hours (and getting a supabase setup) I got the error “text limit reached in this chat”. All the coding was happening on the right in the architect.

I started a new chat and it said it can’t reference from an old chat. So am I just lost???

What platform use case issue am I having? Claud made a 2 week workplace for “us” to build this. And then after 2 hours it ran out chat memory.

How should I be doing this?

Read more

Share

---

• Promoted

Your employees will love Apple products for their unrivaled out-of-the-box simplicity and legendary ease-of-use. And you'll love CDW's service when your devices arrive customized with management tools that automate, simplify and streamline deployment.

---

botapoi

2mo ago

setting up the reporting and backend is usually the hard part for non technical folks. i used blink.new for my invoicing tool because it handles the database and hosting for you

1

inventor_black

2mo ago

Building`serious` applications within the Claude.ai UI is not easy with the chat limits. You might want to look at`Claude Code` or`Claude CoWork`.

1

Substantial-Cost-429

2d ago

Yet another "best workflow" thread whining about memory resets lol, every repo is different. I hacked up a CLI that scanss your repo and spits a tailored AI setup so you stop copying bad configs, runs local with your keys: https://github.com/rely-ai-org/caliber

1

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Your Privacy Choices Accessibility Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.

Expand Navigation Collapse Navigation


id: 69bdfd293baf
title: zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw
summary: zeroclaw是一个用Rust构建的轻量级、完全自主的AI个人助手基础设施，支持任何操作系统和平台部署。该项目提供了灵活的代理框架，允许用户自定义和替换AI组件，适合构建本地化的自动化工作流系统。
source_url: https://github.com/zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw
source_platform: github
author: zeroclaw-labs
published_at: 2026-03-22T00:59:58+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-22T01:02:51.798689+00:00
scenario_type: 工作流自动化
tools_used: ["Rust", "AI Agent Framework", "Cross-platform Infrastructure"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["5a241dca4394", "de2ce3f50104", "da6cd49c549c", "a34e783b92e8", "220851dd1119"]
raw_content:
zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw

Fast, small, and fully autonomous AI personal assistant infrastructure, ANY OS, ANY PLATFORM — deploy anywhere, swap anything 🦀

Topics: agent, agentic, ai, infra, ml, openclaw, os, zeroclaw
Language: Rust | Stars: 28288


id: 18828760520c
title: Show HN: Revise – An AI Editor for Documents
summary: 开发者使用AI代理编程工具构建了一个从零开始开发的AI文档编辑器，历时10个月，仅依赖Y.js进行协作编辑。这个项目展示了AI辅助开发如何加速复杂系统（文字处理引擎、渲染层）的构建效率。
source_url: https://revise.io
source_platform: hackernews
author: artursapek
published_at: 2026-03-22T13:28:45+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-23T01:00:40.850372+00:00
scenario_type: 代码生成与审查
tools_used: ["agentic coding tools", "Y.js CRDT"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["1842541e1ac9", "c308aabe6a31", "8d0142693489", "c22de644b867", "6d32ae370100"]
raw_content:
Show HN: Revise – An AI Editor for Documents

I started building this 10 months ago, largely using agentic coding tools. I&#x27;ve stayed very involved in the code base and architecture, and have never moved faster in my life as a dev.<p>The word processor engine and rendering layer are all built from scratch - the only 3rd party library I used was the excellent Y.js for the CRDT stack.<p>Would love some feedback!


id: 707aa3dba594
title: https://www.reddit.com/r/openclaw/comments/1rqwu4m/how_to_make_openclaw_do_x.json
source_url: https://www.reddit.com/r/openclaw/comments/1rqwu4m/how_to_make_openclaw_do_x.json
source_platform: reddit
author: t2_1kterdprwt
published_at: 2026-03-23T01:00:11.005489+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-23T01:01:41.523441+00:00
scenario_type: 工作流自动化
tools_used: ["OpenClaw", "ChatGPT", "Claude", "Grok", "Notion", "Custom GPTs", "Notebook LLM"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["0ed02b58229f", "286e6147c6ae", "a4713fb9eb43", "2587854ae526"]
summary:
用户通过OpenClaw AI代理实现了内容创作工作流的三级优化：从手动使用LLM辅助创作，升级到使用项目和自定义GPT模板化处理，再到最终用AI代理自动化规划和执行任务。该方案结合Notion数据库和代理指令，显著减少决策疲劳，提高了侧项目收入效率。

raw_content:
https://www.reddit.com/r/openclaw/comments/1rqwu4m/how_to_make_openclaw_do_x.json

What can I use openclaw for? Can I make money using openclaw? Best openclaw usecases? 

Well, I see this question many times, here on reddit, my DMs, my blog everywhere. I'll try to explain this with my example:

So I am a side hustler, I am passionate about teaching and building things. I build apps, give consultations on AI/tech etc. To keep doing things I LOVE, I HAVE to do many things which I probably don't enjoy that much (marketing, crossposting, editing YT videos for hours etc). Now my pain point is that after slogging for 9-10 hours in my day job, I have to take out time for both the things - that I love and that I don't enjoy that much.

* **Level 1** : Now LLMs solved this to a great extent, I could go on these AI platforms and research for topics, create a script, create a thumbnail, take help in editing, descriptions, tags etc. This helped me to drastically increase the time for things I love and reduce the time for things I don't.

My workflow was:

1. Stay updated on current technologies.
2. Decide on a topic/tool (through things I consume like reddit, YT, insta, news etc)
3. Go on to chatgpt/notebook llm to understand that tool.
4. Try that tool.
5. Create a script for it using claude/grok.
6. Refine that script.
7. Record the video.
8. Generate a thumbnail, description etc
9. Separate planning for productizing my skills, writing a pitch for leads, planning consulatncy sessions etc.

* **Level 2** : After a while I started using projects, custom gpts and tasks (grok tasks), I could save on more time by creating projects for each task, like the script writer project has specific instructions and context files for script writing, the thumbnail generator had all the instructions for generating thumbnails and so on. Apart from that I have custom gpts like one has my health info and guides me on my diet (works similar to cal.ai, I just tell what I ate and it gives approximate calories and creates daily workout plan)

So I know I have a set of deterministic tasks which I know I have to do, to remain productive. Now there are few issues with that - sometimes I fall into something which I call **"Chat Hell😅"**, basically endless planning with chatgpt and no execution, sometimes I procastinate, sometimes burnout etc.

* **Level 3** : Now this is where AI agents come into picture. I gave my openclaw my target income from side hustles and I told it that I have just 2 hours to work everyday. I translated the system prompts of those deterministic tasks into agent specific instructions. Created a set of databases on Notion (which I call AI Content Studio) which can be used by my openclaw agents. Identified the skills which my agents need (image-creation, writing into notion, web search etc). Now my agents do the planning, create scripts and keep me focussed on my ultimate goal (earning my target amount).

I save myself from decision fatigue and work only on execution. It is like a mini team which I always wanted to do the boring stuff for me, and paying for APIs is much cheaper than hiring a team (atleast for me).

I know this can be done using many tools like n8n, claude cowork, crewAI etc (I tried creating this in n8n, when it was launched), but openclaw is way easier to work with (opinionated, and once you cross the initial setup phase).

I don't know who is reading till here, but if you are, lets get back to the original question: 
**"How do I make openclaw do X", or what are its use cases?**

Its a mentality question. You need to ask yourself, what if you had a loyal person who could help you with one thing, and that one thing cannot be the thing, you LOVE to do. It should be the thing that you HAVE to do. You need to offload that task to openclaw (or any AI agent), so that you can find more time to do what you love to do.

The next questions will automatically follow: what skills should my "help" has, then go to internet and find out how to add that skill (or just tell openclaw).

The point is, that the tool doesn't matter (whether openclaw or something else), YOU matter. So study yourself, figure out what you want to do, figure out what you have to do to keep doing what you want to do. That is your X. Tell openclaw to do X.

Just my thoughts, put across.


id: b5de04ca4cb1
title: PDFMathTranslate/PDFMathTranslate
source_url: https://github.com/PDFMathTranslate/PDFMathTranslate
source_platform: github
author: PDFMathTranslate
published_at: 2026-03-22T19:19:17+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-23T01:02:09.815571+00:00
scenario_type: 文档与内容处理
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["561dbb212aaf"]
summary:
PDFMathTranslate是一个AI驱动的PDF科学文献翻译工具，可完整保留原文档的排版格式和数学公式，支持多语言互译。该工具提供CLI、GUI、MCP等多种接口及Docker部署选项，与Zotero等学术管理软件集成，具有极高的实用价值和生产力提升潜力。

tools_used:
["PDFMathTranslate", "Google Translate", "DeepL", "Ollama", "OpenAI", "CLI", "GUI", "MCP", "Docker", "Zotero"]

raw_content:
PDFMathTranslate/PDFMathTranslate

[EMNLP 2025 Demo] PDF scientific paper translation with preserved formats - 基于 AI 完整保留排版的 PDF 文档全文双语翻译，支持 Google/DeepL/Ollama/OpenAI 等服务，提供 CLI/GUI/MCP/Docker/Zotero

Topics: chinese, document, edit, english, japanese, korean, latex, math, mcp, modify, obsidian, openai, pdf, pdf2zh, python, russian, translate, translation, zotero
Language: Python | Stars: 32408


id: 71663325b071
title: Claude Code for Non-Coding Projects/Work: A Complete Getting ...
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2026-01-04T00:00:00+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-23T01:02:24.641101+00:00
scenario_type: 终端与CLI增强
tools_used: ["Claude Code", "Obsidian", "OS Terminal", "CLAUDE.md", "Output Styles", "Skills", "Subagents"]
novelty: similar
summary:
本指南介绍了如何使用Claude Code这个强大的CLI工具来自动化非编程工作流程，包括个人知识库管理、会议记录处理和工作自动化。通过配置CLAUDE.md、输出样式和子代理等模块，用户可以无需编程知识即可实现高效的个人工作自动化。该方案强调了Claude Code的项目文件夹隔离、自动配置能力和多样化工作流应用潜力。

source_url:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1q403xw/claude_code_for_noncoding_projectswork_a_complete/

similar_to_ids:
["34e623f22e4a", "54b6b4148a77", "b1b1542da472", "faae7106be20", "e1e06f6feb29", "1de940123469", "257ed0953657"]

raw_content:
Claude Code for Non-Coding Projects/Work: A Complete Getting ...

Claude Code for Non-Coding Projects/Work: A Complete Getting Started Guide : r/ClaudeAI Skip to main content Claude Code for Non-Coding Projects/Work: A Complete Getting Started Guide : r/ClaudeAI

Go to ClaudeAI

r/ClaudeAI 2mo ago

Sammyc64

# Claude Code for Non-Coding Projects/Work: A Complete Getting Started Guide

Most people think Claude Code is just for developers. It's not. Claude Code is actually one of the most powerful personal automation tools available, and you don't need to write a single line of code to use it.

A lot of people on this sub are exploring ways to use the power of Claude Code for non-coding use cases. This is the guide for you! I have also been around this sub touting the benefits of Output Styles, so hopefully this can help for you too!

I've been using Claude Code, since it came out in early 2025, to manage my personal knowledge base (Obsidian vault), process meeting notes, track media, and automate workflows across my work and my life (and yes, also to do some code too, but thats not for this guide!).

Here's how you can get started:

# 1. Setup

Create a project folder and run Claude Code from it, from your OS Terminal app:

```
mkdir ~/Documents/MyProject
cd ~/Documents/MyProject
claude
```

That's it. You're in an interactive Claude Code session.

Why the folder matters: Claude Code operates within your current directory. All configuration files live here. Different folders = different projects/work with different configurations.

First run: Claude will help you authenticate. After that, just type`cd` to any project folder and run`claude`.

Pro tip: Once you're proficient and trust your setup, you can skip permission prompts (DO NOT DO THIS WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING THE RISKS!):

```
claude --dangerously-skip-permissions
```

# 2. The Key Insight

Claude Code can fully configure itself, you just have to ask.

It won't proactively suggest creating configuration files. You need to know what to request.

| Building Block | What It Does | Question It Answers |
| --- | --- | --- |
| CLAUDE.md | Project memory | What's the purpose of this project/work? |
| Output Style | Changes Claude's behavior | How should Claude behave? |
| Skills | Specialized workflows | What are your specific workflows? |
| Subagents | Delegated assistants | What tasks need dedicated focus? |

You can also run`/init` to bootstrap a basic CLAUDE.md, but you'll want to expand it.

Starter prompt — Copy this to kick off your setup:

I'm setting up Claude Code for [describe your project/work].

Help me design the right configuration:- What should my CLAUDE.md contain for this use case?- Help me create a Claude Code output style that would work best for this work.- What skills would help us work more efficiently?- Would any custom subagents be useful?

Ask me questions to fully understand my workflow before making any recommendations. Check the Claude docs for the latest specs on all of these configuration items.

# 3. CLAUDE.md — What's the purpose of this project/work?

The CLAUDE.md file is your project's memory. It tells Claude everything about your project/work and your preferences. Claude reads this at the start of every session.

Location:`./CLAUDE.md` or`./.claude/CLAUDE.md`

What to include:

Project/work overview and purpose

Folder structure (if managing files)

Common workflows and how to handle them

Templates and formatting preferences

Domain-specific terminology

Example prompt:

"Help me create a CLAUDE.md file for this project/work. I'm using this folder for personal knowledge management. Ask me questions about my workflow so you can set it up properly. Check the Claude docs to ensure the CLAUDE.md file is built correctly"

Quick tip: Tell Claude during a session to add notes to your CLAUDE.md:

```
Remember that I prefer bullet points over numbered lists
```

📚 Docs: https://code.claude.com/docs/en/memory

# 4. Output Style — How should Claude behave?

Output Styles customize how Claude responds. This is where you shift Claude away from its default software-engineering/coding focus.

Location:`~/.claude/output-styles/`(personal) or`.claude/output-styles/`(project)

Example prompt:

"Help me create a custom output style for knowledge management. I want Claude to focus on organizing information, not writing code. Ask me questions about the way I want you to behave when we are working on this. Save it to my output-styles folder. Check the Claude Docs to ensure output style is built correctly"

To switch styles:`/output-style` for the menu. (After any changes to the output style, be sure to`/exit` Claude Code and then`claude -c` to continue the previous chat)

# Disabling Coding Focus

The key is`keep-coding-instructions: false` in the frontmatter. This is the default for custom output styles, so Claude's system prompt will:

Exclude instructions for efficient code output

Exclude coding verification and testing patterns

Focus entirely on your custom instructions

In practice, an Output Style with clear CLAUDE.md instructions is usually enough...

📚 Docs: https://code.claude.com/docs/en/output-styles

# 5. Skills — What are your specific workflows?

Agent Skills, now an open format, are specialized capabilities that Claude activates automatically when your request matches the skill's description. Think of them as "expertise modules." It's Neo in the Matrix learning Kung Fu.

Location:`.claude/skills/`(project) or`~/.claude/skills/`(personal)

Example prompt:

"Help me create a skill for processing meeting notes. I prefer my notes to be structured the following way: [include examples]. Walk me through what else a SKILL.md file needs. Check the Claude Docs to ensure the Agent Skill is built correctly and with the latest specs"

How it works: When you say "I just had a call with John about the Q1 budget," Claude recognizes this matches the skill's description and automatically loads it. Claude can even create code scripts (because it still knows how to code) to validate accuracy of an output as a part of the skill!

📚 Docs: https://code.claude.com/docs/en/skills

# 6. Subagents — What tasks need dedicated focus?

Subagents are specialized "assistants" with their own dedicated context windows. They're powerful because:

Separate context — They don't bloat your main conversation

Specialized focus — Each agent has specific expertise

Parallel work — They can research while you continue working

Location:`.claude/agents/`(project) or`~/.claude/agents/`(personal)

# Built-in Subagent Types

| Type | Purpose | Best For |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Explore | Fast, read-only searching | Finding files, understanding structure |
| Plan | Research and analysis | Complex planning, investigation |
| General-Purpose | Full capabilities | Multi-step tasks needing both research and action |

Example prompt:

"Help me set up a custom subagent for [explain the purpose the agent will handle]. Check the Claude Docs to ensure the Subagent is built correctly using the latests specs."

Why this matters for non-coders: Think of it as hiring focused specialists, who still report up to the manager. Each one stays focused on its job.

📚 Docs: https://code.claude.com/docs/en/sub-agents

# Documentation Links (from Anthropic)

Essential:

Getting Started

Installation

CLAUDE.md (Memory)

Output Styles

Skills

Subagents

Additional:

Settings

Slash Commands

Hooks

MCP Servers(Didn't cover, but I prefer Skills > MCP, less token bloat)

# My Setup (Example)

Here's some of what I use Claude Code for...zero coding involved:

Personal Knowledge Base: Obsidian vault with 400+ notes

Meeting Processing: Auto-capture and organize meeting notes from Granola

Media Tracking: Movies and TV shows synced with my media server (and fixes issues)

Smart Home Automation: With Skills, securely connects to my Home Assistant instance to help me manage, fix issues and build automations

Research: Deep dives on topics with web search and synthesis (Pro Tip: Use the awesome NotebookLM and Playwright skills to extract even more!)

Writing: Draft documents, emails, and posts (like this one!)

My Obsidian configuration includes:

Custom output style for knowledge management

10+ skills for different workflows

Multiple subagents for research, analysis, and processing

Commands for automating repetitive tasks (Bonus, ask for Commands too!)

# TL;DR - Getting Started Checklist

Create a project folder

Run`claude` from that folder

Ask Claude to create a CLAUDE.md — What's the purpose of this project/work?

Ask Claude to create an output style — How should Claude behave? (Does it need to code?)

Ask Claude to create skills — What are your specific workflows?

Ask Claude to create subagents — What tasks need dedicated focus?

Key insight: Claude Code can build you all of the tooling you need to help you run Claude Code for any task! All you need to do is ask! This guide tells you what to ask for.

# Questions?

Drop them in the comments. Happy to share more about specific configurations or use cases. Remember, when in doubt....Ask Claude!

This post's content was assisted by Claude Code, naturally.

Read more

Share

---

• Promoted

Get the browser with Gemini built in. Download Google Chrome today.

---

indutrajeev

2mo ago

I’m using it in the same way. BUT doing it git-controlled.

Also: markdown-files are of utmost importance and try to avoid any “blob” files like docx, ppt, … etc as a source doc to not burn your tokens.

11

Sammyc64

2mo ago

Yes!! Git-controlled and Markdowns are great points! You can also ask for Claude to convert the files from docx, pptx, etc, to Markdown for you as a "prep", just be sure to validate the file contents.

3

1 more reply

Continue this thread

IvanCyb

2mo ago

Genuine question: why using Claude Code for such kind of things, when you can use Projects, Skills and MCP in the Desktop App? For example: I can work with my Obsidian vault just by letting Claude to manage the folder of the vault (where the files are text files).

Great thread anyway: I save it for future reference.

5

IdleMuse4

2mo ago

One major benefit is that Claude Desktop 'projects' are still a bit barebones - they can't, for instance, update their own knowledge files or system prompt, you need to manually interact with the interface to do that.

With a claude code project you can get it to write to its own claude.md and obviously created files are persistent rather than recreated from the 'project knowledge' each new conversation.

8

Sammyc64

2mo ago

Glad you liked it!! Hope you use it in the future 😁

I'll echo u/IdleMuse4 regarding Projects functionality (though it does have its uses!), but there's also much more to Claude Code that I didn't fully cover.

The biggest benefit of Claude Code vs. Desktop is the ability to heavily customize the tooling and harness itself, and more critically, its ability to directly read/write files on your filesystem (while still being the same Claude you chat with on Desktop). Another is that I can use Skills outside of the Claude sandbox, which is very limiting (check the NotebookLM skill above, for example). Letting Claude look at many files at once in a folder and search for what it needs itself will often unlock even more power. Don't sleep on the power of subagents either! You can have many run in parallel, and now in the background, taking multiple actions while you're focused on the priority.

Open Claude Code in your Obsidian vault directly, create the necessary skills, output styles (not on Desktop), subagents (which don't exist on Desktop and allow for dedicated 200k token context windows of work within the main context), slash commands for common prompts (not on Desktop), and you can have AI that works for you instead of needing to copy/paste things in and out of Claude Desktop.

Claude Code + Output Styles = Claude Anything.

Side note on MCPs: While they can be highly beneficial for certain workflows, they're also notoriously token-inefficient (loading everything into context at once). So yes, you can get to the same goal, but you'll burn more tokens to get there (which can mean more $ if using the API, but worse, you're bloating your context window more quickly).

3

IvanCyb

2mo ago

Thank you very much (also u/IdleMuse4, thank you as well!).I see the real power of Claude Code, and I'm going to experiment with it.I've never tested it because I've always felt too much "high-code" for me.

2

6 more replies

Continue this thread Continue this thread 1 more reply

Continue this thread

twentworth12

2mo ago

How are you accessing Granola notes?

3

1 more reply

Continue this thread

• Promoted

Great campaigns start with you. Claude Cowork handles the brief, research, and recap so they don't eat your week.

robmetalballs

2mo ago

Really good post many thanks. Will defo try this to optimise my existing setups

3

ElegantGrand8

2mo ago

My number 1 prediction for 2026 is that Claude Code is going to spread beyond coding.

Obviously OP knows how good it is.

I've been telling everyone I know to start using this.

3

2 more replies

Continue this thread

the_quark

2mo ago

Pro tip: Once you're proficient and trust your setup, you can skip permission prompts (DO NOT DO THIS WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING THE RISKS!):

`claude --dangerously-skip-permissions`

I love Claude Code but I really really do not recommend this.`--dangerously-skip-permissions` lets Claude read, write and delete any file in your home directory. If it gets confused, you can lose a lot more than just your Claude project, and we've had people on this very sub complaining about this very thing after it happened to them. There's a reason it includes dangerous in the flag name.

You should only do this if you're running Claude Code in a container, and to be frank, if you need this guide, you're probably not.

3

nominal_fees

2mo ago

Not an issue if you have backups

2

HeyItsYourDad_AMA

2mo ago

You can set permissions in the settings to keep Claude Code from ever deleting anything or doing something truly dangerous, e.g. "rm -rf /*". Granted, deleting files is often a good thing you may want, like creating a quick test script, executing, then deleting the file. So it's always a tradeoff.

2

1 more reply

Continue this thread 1 more reply

Continue this thread

Piotrix76

2mo ago

I wanted to make Claude my learning assistant in medical school. The goal is to give the LLM access to my textbooks in a pdf format and force it to answer my questions based on them. Would this be a good use case for Claude code? I tried perplexity spaces and Gemini gems so far. The files are quite large.

3

HoldenMeBeer

2mo ago

I'd like to know this too. I have a project set up for work things. The project has files associated with it: SLAs, proposals, general notes. I've been using Claude to help update the SLAs, suggest pricing modifications and margins, help with sales opps, and catalog meeting notes in separate conversations within the project. However, I've been feeling like more and more that I'm just burning thru tokens. I'm almost positive that I can be doing this more efficiently, but not sure. The PDFs in my case aren't that large. But I feel like the context for each conversation is just killing my usage. Suggestions?

Not trying to take over Piotrix's question, as I feel like mine is pretty much the same-ish.

2

5 more replies

Continue this thread

ActivityCheif101

2mo ago

Yes, sounds like a great use case for Claude Code. A couple skills and a Claude Code project should do.

2

1 more reply

Continue this thread

raptortrapper

2mo ago

This is awesome.

2

1 more reply

Continue this thread

ozzono

2mo ago

tu tutorial me sirvió para empezar con CC, he usado otros modelos antes, pero cc no. Para mis pruebas con un simple tetris que estoy armando para aprender a usar todo esto, me gasté USD 5 en menos de 30' y solo le pedí que me audite el código que ya tenía y que me arme un auditoria.md.Me parece super caro. ¿Qué hice mal?

2

Sammyc64

2mo ago

¡Me alegra que el tutorial te haya ayudado a empezar - bienvenido a Claude Code!

Sobre el costo: probablemente estabas usando Opus, que es el modelo más potente pero también el más caro en este momento. Para tareas como auditorías de código y generar documentación, Sonnet funciona muy bien y cuesta significativamente menos.

Algunos tips para manejar los costos:

Usa`claude --model sonnet` para tareas rutinarias - revisiones de código, auditorías, documentación, ediciones simples

Reserva Opus para razonamiento complejo - decisiones de arquitectura, debugging difícil, resolución de problemas con múltiples pasos

Considera la suscripción Max ($100/mes o $200/mes) - incluye una cantidad generosa de uso, lo cual puede ahorrarte mucho si usas Claude Code regularmente

Ejecuta /cost durante las sesiones para monitorear tu gasto en tiempo real

El modelo correcto para la tarea correcta hace una gran diferencia. Sonnet maneja perfectamente el 80%+ del trabajo diario de programación a una fracción del costo.

¡Usé Claude para traducir, disculpa si no es la mejor traducción!

2

Continue this thread

• Promoted

Explore your data with an AI data analyst built for startups, and connects to all your data.

mental-albert

2mo ago

This is a brilliant post, love the details. I am going to try and implement some of this for some of my writing and knowledge management.

2

No-Age-4004

2mo ago

Thanks for this!

2

1 more reply

Continue this thread

eternali2097

2mo ago

Thanks for sharing this valuable piece of tutorial / information. Highly appreciate it. Currently dabbling with building such a workflow. So this came in the nick of time. 😅

2

1 more reply

Continue this thread

Wise-Bodybuilder6335

2mo ago

long time lurker, thanks for the post -- it got me thinking!

I started playing with CC on my own and now brought it into my company. We are trying to fully automate email review and project management task generation/execution.

Someone already shared MCPs are limiting and I totally agree. We are mainly using googleAppScript to collect data into a google sheet and send it over to the model. In this way we avoid all those ton of unnecessary soul searching needs to do while exploring the MCP.

Let's say that for " boring things" like email checking, it is much easier to have CC pull a couple of triggers and get the info ready to use into an human-readable medium, so we can troubleshoot.

2

ThemeAccomplished708

2mo ago

I’m curious about whether it might be possible to upload data from my full genome (generated through Nebula Genomics, now called DNA Complete) and set an instruction whereby anytime there is new research published about the health implications of one of my structural variants, I am notified. (This would be a potential use case that would make it worthwhile for me to upgrade from Pro to Max to be able to access Claude Code).

2

neybar

2mo ago

I'm really curious about your obsidian setup. Can you share your output style, skills, and agents configs? Do you even use the obsidian UI anymore, or do you just use Code as your front door to notes?

I've been splitting my notes between personal (Notes for Mac/iOS) and work (onenote). But I'm quickly discovering that those systems aren't really conducive to AI. Obsidian came up and I'm diving in. What does your day-to-day look like with Code/Obsidian.

2

1 more reply

Continue this thread

redpin67

1mo ago

as a non coder reading this seems like it's definietly built for coders or defintely not built for non-coders ...anyone else agree?

2

4 more replies

Continue this thread

---

## View Post in

Русский

Tiếng Việt

Português (Brasil)

हिन्दी

简体中文

繁體中文

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Your Privacy Choices Accessibility Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.

Expand Navigation Collapse Navigation


id: 57e96fefb74a
title: I built a personal AI assistant using Claude Code + Obsidian to start ...
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2025-07-15T00:00:00+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-23T01:02:34.458318+00:00
scenario_type: 个人知识管理
tools_used: ["Claude Code", "Obsidian", "MacOS Shortcut", "SuperWhisper", "Git"]
novelty: repeat
similar_to_ids: ["1af6cd68ee76"]
summary:
用户利用Claude Code和Obsidian构建了个人AI助手，通过扫描日历、语音输入和自定义斜杠命令实现自动化的晨间日计划工作流。该系统展示了AI代理与本地知识管理系统的深度集成，支持历史数据分析和周度回顾等高级功能。

source_url:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1m0msbi/i_built_a_personal_ai_assistant_using_claude_code/

raw_content:
I built a personal AI assistant using Claude Code + Obsidian to start ...

I built a personal AI assistant using Claude Code + Obsidian to start my day : r/ClaudeCode Skip to main content I built a personal AI assistant using Claude Code + Obsidian to start my day : r/ClaudeCode

Go to ClaudeCode

r/ClaudeCode 8mo ago

ArtemXTech

# I built a personal AI assistant using Claude Code + Obsidian to start my day

I've been experimenting with Claude Code and wanted to share a practical implementation that handles my daily planning workflow. This creates a personalized morning routine that follows a consistent template I designed.

The setup uses a Claude Code agent that automatically scans my calendar, then asks three specific questions about my daily intentions according to the template. I respond using voice input (processed by SuperWhisper), and the agent creates structured daily notes in my Obsidian vault. The whole process is triggered by a single MacOS shortcut.

I created a custom /daily-note slash command in Obsidian and share details about writing effective slash commands in the blog post, as well as the command itself. One key learning I want to share: you need to be very specific about what you want to get reproducible workflows. The agent follows predefined instruction files for consistent output formatting.

I'm excited to share this experiment and would love feedback from the community. Has anyone else tried integrating Claude Code with their Obsidian workflows? What are your thoughts on using AI agents for personal productivity? I'm particularly interested in how others are approaching reproducible automation.

Demo video: https://youtu.be/jDZco4lAX14

Blog post with details and learnings: https://artemxtech.github.io/I-Built-a-Personal-AI-Assistant-for-My-Day-in-Obsidian

Read more

Share

---

• Promoted

Access 500+ AI models. Full BYOK support.

---

chenverdent

8mo ago

This is very cool. I do sync my vault with git and this now gets me thinking what else could be done. Even noninteractive Claude that could check previous entries or write a daily review.

5

ArtemXTech

8mo ago

Yeah, I have a similar workflow. Basically, I instruct the agent to analyze the history of commits in my Obsidian Vault and find the files which were changed and prepare context for me for a weekly review.

My strategy is to first answer the questions without any context and then look at the context provided by the agent and improve on that. Indeed, a lot of opportunities, a lot of ideas.

1

Continue this thread

maverick_soul_143747

8mo ago

This is awesome man. Love it.

1

webtron18

4mo ago

What do you get out of daily notes? Do you consistently look back on them or reference them? I’ve tried before and they just end up as stale notes. I moved to a now.md file that is my ‘daily note’ with a template but it just updates every time I run /refreshnow command. I use git for my vault each day so it can read historical stuff but I don’t have to worry about old notes.

1

ArtemXTech

3mo ago

Yes so daily notes enable me to just capture my plan in the morning and then I follow for that plan. And then in the middle of the day I might be deviating from it and I perform refocus sessions where I update this plan. That's one use case. Another use case is during the weekly review I ask Claude to run subagent to understand what I was doing this week and this is very helpful for reflecting on your last week

There are different approaches. I think the best one is the one that works for you

1

Continue this thread

## Top Posts

---

---

---

---

- Reddit reReddit: Top posts of 2025
- Reddit reReddit: Top posts of July 2025
- Reddit reReddit: Top posts of July 15, 2025

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Accessibility Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.

Expand Navigation Collapse Navigation

Let us know your cookie preferences

Reddit uses cookies and similar technologies to:

- Monitor site usage and performance metrics
- Prevent fraud and abuse
- Keep the website operational and running properly

If you choose “Accept All” we’ll also use cookies to:

- Develop and improve new features and services
- Measure the performance of ads
- Personalize your recommendations and ads

If you choose “Reject Optional Cookies” we won’t use cookies for these additional uses. You can update your cookie preference from your settings.

Learn more about how Reddit uses cookies.

Accept All Reject Optional Cookies


id: a7ff1835e846
title: Show HN: Cq – Stack Overflow for AI coding agents
source_url: https://blog.mozilla.ai/cq-stack-overflow-for-agents/
source_platform: hackernews
author: peteski22
published_at: 2026-03-23T16:11:03+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-24T01:00:59.785456+00:00
scenario_type: 代码生成与审查
tools_used: ["Claude Code", "FastMCP", "FastAPI", "Docker", "SQLite", "OpenAI", "MCP server"]
novelty: new
similar_to_ids: []
summary:
Cq是一个为AI编码代理设计的知识共享平台,类似于Stack Overflow,允许代理记录和学习开发中遇到的常见问题(如过期的GitHub Actions版本)。该项目采用本地优先架构,支持个人、团队和未来的公共知识库,通过人工审核环节确保知识质量,可显著提升多个AI模型的代码生成准确性。

raw_content:
Show HN: Cq – Stack Overflow for AI coding agents

Hi all, I&#x27;m Peter at Staff Engineer and Mozilla.ai and I want to share our idea for a standard for shared agent learning, conceptually it seemed to fit easily in my mental model as a Stack Overflow for agents.<p>The project is trying to see if we can get agents (any agent, any model) to propose &#x27;knowledge units&#x27; (KUs) as a standard schema based on gotchas it runs into during use, and proactively query for existing KUs in order to get insights which it can verify and confirm if they prove useful.<p>It&#x27;s currently very much a PoC with a more lofty proposal in the repo, we&#x27;re trying to iterate from local use, up to team level, and ideally eventually have some kind of public commons.<p>At the team level (see our Docker compose example) and your coding agent configured to point to the API address for the team to send KUs there instead - where they can be reviewed by a human in the loop (HITL) via a UI in the browser, before they&#x27;re allowed to appear in queries by other agents in your team.<p>We&#x27;re learning a lot even from using it locally on various repos internally, not just in the kind of KUs it generates, but also from a UX perspective on trying to make it easy to get using it and approving KUs in the browser dashboard. There are bigger, complex problems to solve in the future around data privacy, governance etc. but for now we&#x27;re super focussed on getting something that people can see some value from really quickly in their day-to-day.<p>Tech stack:<p>* Skills - markdown<p>* Local Python MCP server (FastMCP) - managing a local SQLite knowledge store<p>* Optional team API (FastAPI, Docker) for sharing knowledge across an org<p>* Installs as a Claude Code plugin or OpenCode MCP server<p>* Local-first by default; your knowledge stays on your machine unless you opt into team sync by setting the address in config<p>* OSS (Apache 2.0 licensed)<p>Here&#x27;s an example of something which seemed straight forward, when asking Claude Code to write a GitHub action it often used actions that were multiple major versions out of date because of its training data. In this case I told the agent what I saw when I reviewed the GitHub action YAML file it created and it proposed the knowledge unit to be persisted. Next time in a completely different repo using OpenCode and an OpenAI model, the cq skill was used up front before it started the task and it got the information about the gotcha on major versions in training data and checked GitHub proactively, using the correct, latest major versions. It then confirmed the KU, increasing the confidence score.<p>I guess some folks might say: well there&#x27;s a CLAUDE.md in your repo, or in ~&#x2F;.claude&#x2F; but we&#x27;re looking further than that, we want this to be available to all agents, to all models, and maybe more importantly we don&#x27;t want to stuff AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md with loads of rules that lead to unpredictable behaviour, this is targetted information on a particular task and seems a lot more useful.<p>Right now it can be installed locally as a plugin for Claude Code and OpenCode:<p>claude plugin marketplace add mozilla-ai&#x2F;cq
claude plugin install cq<p>This allows you to capture data in your local ~&#x2F;.cq&#x2F;local.db (the data doesn&#x27;t get sent anywhere else).<p>We&#x27;d love feedback on this, the repo is open and public - so GitHub issues are welcome. We&#x27;ve posted on some of our social media platforms with a link to the blog post (below) so feel free to reply to us if you found it useful, or ran into friction, we want to make this something that&#x27;s accessible to everyone.<p>Blog post with the full story: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.mozilla.ai&#x2F;cq-stack-overflow-for-agents&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.mozilla.ai&#x2F;cq-stack-overflow-for-agents&#x2F;</a>
GitHub repo: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mozilla-ai&#x2F;cq" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mozilla-ai&#x2F;cq</a><p>Thanks again for your time.


id: 812ad789aa06
title: OpenClaw replaced all of my other AI automations, and it's so good. : r/AIAssisted
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2026-03-24T01:00:09.204965+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-24T01:01:11.925846+00:00
scenario_type: 工作流自动化
tools_used: ["OpenClaw", "ExoClaw", "n8n", "Python", "Telegram", "WhatsApp", "Slack", "Gmail"]
novelty: similar
summary:
用户通过OpenClaw和ExoClaw替代了之前使用n8n和Python的AI自动化方案，建立了由主AI助手管理多个AI代理的系统来自动化营销机构的业务流程。该方案能够连接Telegram、WhatsApp等通讯应用和Gmail、网站等工作工具，可自动执行日常任务改进、SEO关键词分析、内容生成等营销相关工作流。

source_url:
https://www.reddit.com/r/AIAssisted/comments/1r4kmc5/openclaw_replaced_all_of_my_other_ai_automations/

similar_to_ids:
["0ed02b58229f", "5a241dca4394", "de2ce3f50104", "a4713fb9eb43", "2587854ae526", "9d8451ba2dcd", "b2c80ce8e19d"]

raw_content:
OpenClaw replaced all of my other AI automations, and it's so good. : r/AIAssisted

OpenClaw replaced all of my other AI automations, and it's so good. : r/AIAssisted Skip to main content OpenClaw replaced all of my other AI automations, and it's so good. : r/AIAssisted

Go to AIAssisted

r/AIAssisted 1d ago

InevitableSea5900

# OpenClaw replaced all of my other AI automations, and it's so good.

First of all This is very different than all the AI workflows i have tried!

I run a small marketing agency. and have been using a combination of n8n + python code and other tools to automate my tasks but it's a a real hustle to do it and it breaks easily.

What makes openclaw special is you have a single Ai assistant that reports to you who manages a fleet of many other Ai agents.

It takes time at first to set up, and by setting up I mean telling the AI Agent what to do, what your goals are and figure out how it can benefit you. once you have one of your "jobs" automated then its easy to do the rest because the AI will understand you, your business, already connected to you through messaging apps like telegram, whatsapp, slack etc.. and also connected to your work apps , browser, social media, etc.

Sounds amazing but there is a catch, with so much power comes a lot of risks too.This is an autonomous agent that can run code, build tools, write it's own code, create new agents , access files and execute system commands. So i'm personally not gonna run it on my laptop or anywhere personal.

I tried to run OpenClaw on a spare laptop i had and the setup was not as easy as i thought, so I gave up.

few days later i found this other website called ExoClaw which runs and maintains these AI assistant on remote servers securely.

So what they do is basically create a server for you with the Agent already configured on it and you can connect to it via telegram or whatsapp and the Agent will have it's own desktop files to work on. I created it , connected my telegram and then create a new Gmail account for it and gave it. It signed up to the gmail and send me an email successfully.

- I suggest start with small tasks to get a hang of it, Don't tell it go make billion dollar company and come back :)

At first you only wanna do small talk to it and slowly connect your tools and expand.

I think most people embracing these tools will have an army of autonomous AI agents running their Business tasks, and they will be able to sell their servers + agents for millions.

one automation i did was that i gave it my website url, told it to come up with automations we can run daily that will improve our business. it came up with good ideas, then i improved them and now it has a few tasks that it runs every 1 hours.

next i'm gonna use it to analyse keywords for seo and write me draft blog posts.or I can have it watch trending Tiktoks every 4 hours, come up with new video ideas and send it to me , i approve them and tell it what to do next. If a full automation is working smoothly for a day or two then i tell it to "Create a dedicated Agent for this task" so it creates a Top Agent that does for example "tiktok marketing" or "seo analysis" which report to the Main agent.

If you need help setting up your ExoClaw agents or wanna have a look at my setup just DM me and i'll be happy to share more.

Read more

Share

---

• Promoted

Developers & Codex 🩷 Try Codex for free with expanded limits.

---

Sawyer2016

22h ago

Where are the moderators? Not sure what the advertising policies are here but I think perhaps you should please clearly state at the beginning and end that this is an ad for Exoclaw.

6

quentolin

1d ago

I would really love if anyone could help me with openclaw. Im the dumbest person in the world on ai, just using Gemini for my html and python

1

---

## View Post in

Português (Brasil)

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Your Privacy Choices Accessibility Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.


id: de93a1855302
title: LLMs learn what programmers create, not how programmers work
source_url: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47494696
source_platform: hackernews
author: noemit
published_at: 2026-03-23T20:31:48+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-24T01:01:39.101952+00:00
scenario_type: 代码生成与审查
tools_used: ["CLI", "LLM agent tool", "Kimi K2.5"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["861656b00eb7", "517aee42d849", "4cbcc14ad9be", "8d0142693489"]
summary:
作者通过实验发现大语言模型学习的是程序员创建的代码外观（如文档中的格式），而非实际的输入方式，揭示了LLM在CLI工具调用中会按照文档示例格式（如命令前加冒号）而非真实输入习惯进行操作。这启示开发者应该测试LLM的自然行为并相应调整系统提示，而非试图对抗其内在直觉。

raw_content:
LLMs learn what programmers create, not how programmers work

I ran an experiment to see if CLI actually was the most intuitive format for tool calling. (As claimed by a ex-Manus AI Backend Engineer) I gave my model random scenarios and a single tool &quot;run&quot; - i told it that it worked like a CLI. I told it to guess commands.<p>it guessed great commands, but it formatted it always with a colon up front, like 
:help
:browser
:search
:curl<p>It was trained on how terminals look, not what you actually type (you don&#x27;t type the &quot;:&quot;)<p>I have since updated my code in my agent tool to stop fighting against this intuition.<p>LLMs they learn what commands look like in documentation&#x2F;artifacts, not what the human actually typed on the keyboard.<p>Seems so obvious. This is why you have to test your LLM and see how it naturally works, so you don&#x27;t have to fight it with your system prompt.<p>This is Kimi K2.5 Btw.


id: 0daf7353188a
title: How to vibe-code CLI tool + skill to ...
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2026-03-21T01:00:10.375000+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-24T01:01:51.157241+00:00
scenario_type: 终端与CLI增强
tools_used: ["Claude Opus 4", "OpenCode", "ClickUp API", "obra superpowers", "npm", "Homebrew", "CI/CD"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["abb1b9505bb9", "79f64a247e2a", "54b6b4148a77", "71663325b071"]
summary:
用户通过Claude Opus创建了一个ClickUp CLI工具和配套技能文件，以减少AI代理的上下文切换开销。该方法强调CLI+SKILL.md模式相比MCP服务器更高效，展示了可复用的模式来为任何有API的服务构建代理友好的集成工具，大幅提升了AI工作流的效率和token利用率。

source_url:
https://www.reddit.com/r/vibecoding/comments/1ryveg7/how_to_vibecode_cli_tool_skill_to_vibecode_longer/

raw_content:
How to vibe-code CLI tool + skill to ...

How to vibe-code CLI tool + skill to vibe-code longer without compacting : r/vibecoding Skip to main content How to vibe-code CLI tool + skill to vibe-code longer without compacting : r/vibecoding

Go to vibecoding

r/vibecoding 1d ago

krodak

# How to vibe-code CLI tool + skill to vibe-code longer without compacting

I work with AI agents daily and try really hard to minimise context switching and enable agent to use all the tools I'd normally use during development, which goes really well nowadays as agents are good into finding those tools themselves. But as my work requires ClickUp, I got tired of alt-tabbing to it for every status update, comment, or task description I just wanted to feed that into context, so I vibe-coded a CLI for it, along with a skill, so agent would pick it up automatically.

The whole project was built with Claude Opus 4, set to High mode via OpenCode (😉) Not a single line written by hand.

I want to share the build process, as I think the pattern is reusable for anyone who wants to vibe-code their own CLI tools, which I'd recommend as massive AI productivity boost

## The philosophy: CLI + SKILL.md

My biggest takeaway from working with agents is that CLI tools paired with a skill file use way fewer tokens than MCP servers or browser-based workflows. The agent runs a shell command, gets structured output, pipes it if needed, then moves on - no protocol overhead, no server process, no massive context dumps, just straight data

This matters because it means less compacting. I can work through longer sessions without the agent losing track of what it's doing. The skill file is small (a few hundred lines of markdown), the CLI output is compact (markdown when piped, JSON as alternative), and the agent doesn't need to hold much state.

I think this pattern - build a CLI, write a SKILL.md, hand it to your agent - could work for pretty much any service that has an API but no good agent integration. Your company's internal tools, your CRM, your deployment pipeline. If you can write a REST client and a markdown file describing how to use it, an agent can learn it.

## The build process

I use obra superpowers for my agent workflow. It's a set of skills that teach Claude how to plan, implement, review, and ship code in a structured way. I'd say it's a nice sweet spot between writing simple prompts and running full looping frameworks like Ralph. You get structured planning and parallel execution without the complexity of a whole orchestration system.

After the initial setup (repo, npm, Homebrew, CI, tag-based releases, also done by agent), every new feature uses more or less the same prompt, relying heavy on superpowers skillset:

```
Use brainstorming skill to prepare for implementing <task>, // 1
ask as many questions as needed

Let's go with Approach <A/B/C> // 2

Use writing-plan skill to prepare complete plan as
.md file for <task>

Use subagent-driven-development and executing-plans
skills to implement complete plan and confirm it with tests

Do not make development yourself, act as orchestrator
for subagents, by using dispatching-parallel-agents.
If you have further questions, make decisions on your
own and document them in DECISIONS.md

Keep PROGRESS.md to track progress and carry on this
to your next agents. Point subagents to those files
and link to them in compacting summary.
```

I sometimes omit // 1 or // 1 + 2, depending whether I already cleared up with agent what to build

What this does in practice: the agent brainstorms approaches, picks one, writes a detailed plan, then spawns sub-agents to implement each part of the plan in parallel. It tracks progress in markdown files so when context gets long, the summary links back to the plan and decisions. Each sub-agent writes tests, the orchestrator reviews. I mostly just approve or redirect. I hardly ever need to answer some questions after brainstorming, mostly when I just sloped request ("let's add comments functionality")

The AGENTS.md in the repo instructs the agent to handle the release at the end of new features too - version bump, tag, push. So the whole cycle from "I want feature X" to "it's published on npm" requires almost no oversight from me. I trust the tests, and tests are honestly the only code I look at sometimes. But not really even that.

One feature (time tracking - 6 commands, fully tested, documented) took about ~10-15 minutes of my time. Most of that was reviewing the plan and confirming the approach, agent did everything else. But frankly at this point I trust it enough to not review smaller features

## What the tool actually does

`cup` is a ClickUp CLI. Three output modes:

In your terminal: interactive tables with a task picker, colored output

Piped (what agents see): clean Markdown, sized for context windows

`--json`: structured data for scripts

```
# Morning standup
cup summary

# Agent reads a task, does the work, updates it
cup task PROJ-123
cup update PROJ-123 -s "in progress"
# ...does the work...
cup comment PROJ-123 -m "Fixed in commit abc1234"
cup update PROJ-123 -s "in review"
```

40+ commands covering tasks, comments, sprints, checklists, time tracking, custom fields, tags, dependencies, attachments. Each feature is fully tested. The repo includes a ready-to-use skill file for Claude Code, OpenCode, Codex (these are some of the few things I actually needed to review and test)

GitHub: https://github.com/krodak/clickup-cli npm: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@krodak/clickup-cli

If you're thinking about building CLI tools for your own workflow, let me know. The CLI + skill file pattern has been the biggest productivity unlock for me recently

Read more

Share

---

• Promoted

Build a real app from one simple prompt with Base44. Start building today.

Collapse video player

---



Sea-Currency2823

1d ago

This is a really solid approach. CLI + structured output + a small “skill file” basically turns the agent into something much more deterministic. You’re reducing noise and forcing everything through predictable interfaces, which is probably why it scales better over longer sessions.

I think the key insight here is that context size isn’t the real problem — unstructured context is. Once you move to commands + compact outputs, the agent doesn’t need to “remember” as much because the state is externalized. That’s a much more sustainable pattern than relying on long chats or MCP-style setups.

I’ve been seeing a similar pattern in tools that lean toward smaller, trigger-based workflows instead of heavy sessions. Even something like Runable follows that direction — focusing on short, well-defined actions rather than maintaining huge context. Feels like this is where things are heading.

1



krodak

1d ago

Totally agree, I think we are all converging into stripping off heavy tooling and making AI agents use as lean calls as possible to fight compacting

1

Continue this thread

---

## View Post in

Português (Brasil)

Français

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Your Privacy Choices Accessibility Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.

Expand Navigation Collapse Navigation


id: 63d71f268759
title: Outworked – An Open Source Office UI for Claude Code Agents
source_url: https://github.com/outworked/outworked
source_platform: hackernews
author: ZeidJ
published_at: 2026-03-23T17:44:22+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-24T01:02:15.659366+00:00
scenario_type: 终端与CLI增强
tools_used: ["Claude Code", "Outworked", "Office UI"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["52d44a688882", "1d33fcd888f9", "e1e06f6feb29", "b1b1542da472", "7c94eb734f17"]
raw_content: Outworked – An Open Source Office UI for Claude Code Agents
summary:
Outworked是一个为Claude代码代理设计的开源办公室UI工具，旨在增强Claude Code CLI的功能和用户体验。该项目通过提供图形化界面来简化代码代理的交互和工作流管理，提高开发效率和可用性。


id: cc892671a906
title: I stopped using Claude.ai entirely. I run my entire business ...
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2026-03-18T01:00:12.171000+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-24T01:02:41.924952+00:00
scenario_type: 工作流自动化
tools_used: ["Claude Code", "Termius", "Tmux", "Tailscale", "ZeroTier", "OpenClaw", "Telegram", "Discord"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["286e6147c6ae", "0ed02b58229f", "a4713fb9eb43", "95b07c16360e", "4188cb874081"]
summary:
用户通过Claude Code CLI构建了完整的商业自动化系统，将CRM、内容管道、客户跟进等所有业务流程集成到终端命令中，实现了从web应用到基础设施级别的转变。社区分享了使用CLAUDE.md配置文件、多代理管道、以及通过SSH和第三方工具实现移动端控制的高级工作流架构。

source_url:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1rwmj25/i_stopped_using_claudeai_entirely_i_run_my_entire/

raw_content:
I stopped using Claude.ai entirely. I run my entire business ...

I stopped using Claude.ai entirely. I run my entire business through Claude Code. : r/ClaudeAI Skip to main content I stopped using Claude.ai entirely. I run my entire business through Claude Code. : r/ClaudeAI

Go to ClaudeAI

r/ClaudeAI 1d ago

ColdPlankton9273

# I stopped using Claude.ai entirely. I run my entire business through Claude Code.

Someone asked me today why I never use the web app. I realized I haven't opened it in months.

Everything I do runs through Claude Code. Not just coding. My morning routine, my CRM, my content pipeline, my lead sourcing, my follow-ups. All of it.

I built a system that runs my entire business from the terminal. One command in the morning, and my whole day is laid out. I copy, paste, check boxes, move on.

At some point I stopped thinking of Claude as something I chat with and started treating it as infrastructure. That changed everything.

Don't get me wrong, I still chat with it, but only on cloud code.

Anyone else gone full Claude Code for non-coding work?

Read more

Share

---

• Promoted

If you’re looking to bring AI agents into your stack, this playbook is worth a skim.

---

ClaudeAI-mod-bot

21h ago

TL;DR of the discussion generated automatically after 100 comments.

The consensus is clear: you guys are all in on Claude Code, treating it as infrastructure rather than just a chatbot. The thread is overwhelmingly in agreement with OP, with many sharing their own advanced workflows.

The big brain move is to stop chatting and start building. The top comment lays out the blueprint: use a master`CLAUDE.md` for global settings and folder-specific`readme.md` files for task instructions. Power users are building multi-agent pipelines where specialized agents (or skills) hand off tasks to each other, like a digital assembly line for anything from website creation to content marketing. One user even shared their`kipi-system` repo for this.

The biggest gripe is the lack of a good mobile experience. The community's got workarounds, though:

The New Hotness: The`/remote-control` command is Anthropic's new, slightly buggy answer to this.

The Sysadmin Special: Using tools like Termius, Tmux, and Tailscale/ZeroTier to SSH into your machine from your phone.

The Orchestrator: Using third-party tools like OpenClaw to interact with your setup via Telegram or Discord.

A word of caution, though. One user let CC have system-wide permissions to fix a Windows issue, which freaked a lot of people out. The general advice is to treat CC with the same security discipline as any other automated system: least privilege, review before execution, and don't let it go rogue changing registry keys.

For those wondering about Code vs. Co-work, the vibe here is that Co-work is a good starting point, but Code is where the real power is.

1

2 more replies

Continue this thread

Wise-Control5171

1d ago

A good CLAUDE.md file along with a REALLY good readme.md file and just about anything is possible.

Claude.md controls broad settings and is read at every start, a readme.md file in a folder is where CC likes to look for instructions. I do business automation, SEO, and web design so I have templated folders.

"Create a website for COMPANY using /websitetemplate/" will produce and entire website. I have 7 different agents that each take a turn, some sequential, at gathering data online including images, biographies, company data, etc., and then compiling it into a JSON file. The next agent designs and develops the site and deploys it to Github and Vercel.

After that, 4 agents run (Design, Content, SEO, Pagespeed) and handle their business. Each one runs multiple times and edits one thing (all Sonnet agents). Then my last agent is a visual agent who checks to make sure everything looks right. Opens Chrome, takes screenshots, analyzes, fixes problems.

It takes 30 minutes to 5-6 hours to create a website from nothing. Costs me pennies in Vercel costs and maybe .01% of my weekly token usage.

I am in Claude Code most of the day and when I need to do something else, I think, "should I automate this with Claude Code?"

171

ColdPlankton9273

1d ago

This is great. The multi-agent pipeline is where it gets interesting. Having specialized agents that each handle one thing and pass results forward is way more reliable than one mega-session trying to do everything.

I do something similar with skills instead of agents. 35+ markdown files that each encode a specific workflow. Voice consistency, content review, meeting debriefs, engagement tracking. The model loads only the skill it needs for the current task. Same idea, different shape.

The "should I automate this with Claude Code?" instinct is real. Once the system works, everything starts looking like a workflow you could encode.

35

Jambi_46n2

22h ago

Can you please summarize this in a haiku?

17

2 more replies

Continue this thread 2 more replies

Continue this thread

sober-lion

23h ago

When you are talking about different agents do you mean different folders with different Claude.md files that you start in separate terminals? Or something different?

14

aradil

17h ago

I do this.

But it also natively can run its own subagents if you ask it to. My peer review skill uses subagents to give them a limited context with targeted peer review goals without having the context clouded by the code it already wrote in an attempt to avoid the “Agent reviewing itself” problem.

Haven’t done enough a/b testing to know if it’s actually helpful, but the output has been outstanding enough that I haven’t bothered trying out alternatives.

As for multiple agents in different directories with their own CLAUDE.md and skills, it’s pretty clear how this can be useful. There are an infinite number of ways to do orchestration. Claude code natively supports teams of agents now… https://code.claude.com/docs/en/agent-teams

My own control plane is roughly similar, but uses hooks that also forward info to a message bus downstream for consumption by other tools.

14

trippereneur

22h ago

Also keen to know how to orchestrate N:N agentic workflows

11

Continue this thread

_Kinging

22h ago

I’m new to this just wondering when you say 7 different agents, are they made through claude cowork, or openclaw or something else? Just trying to understand, sorry to ask!

14

ptyblog

17h ago

Each agent is a folder you put there its CLAUDE.ai + skills.md + any python script it needs, context files anything else you think is needed.

One level above you have a main claude.md file to rule them all and in the darkness bind them all.

15

Continue this thread

Progvan

20h ago

I'm REALLY interested on learning from your system! Could you please share it? I'm reading the kipi-system git, very interesting, but as non coder, Claude-learning individual, adhd and overall designer and visual learner, I'm really eager and now in need to learn from your system for websites and client work. It'd mean the world to me! TIA!

12

3 more replies

Continue this thread 25 more replies

Continue this thread

Main-Actuator3803

23h ago

Interesting, I have been having a different experience with claude code vs the web app. My flow so far is have the deep conversations with claudeAi (wether code architecture related or product design and coming up with mockups), ask it to create a prompt then take it to claude code. My experience with claude code so far has been very mechanical without really deep or conversational thinking. Curious how have you mitigated this

19

j3rrylee

22h ago

I have the exact workflow. Claude.Ai for brainstorming and architecture. Claude code for implementation. I can point Claude.AI to my local repo to gather context so I don’t need to re-explain the progress. I prefer Claude.ai’s interface for deep conversations vs CLI

9

2 more replies

Continue this thread

• Promoted

Create without limits. Imagine without compromise.

Collapse video player

BadAtDrinking

1d ago

Today I learned that ClaudeAI can't take attachments over 31MB. But Claude Code can take anything on my computer, any size.

46

Crinkez

20h ago

”Claude, open this zip bomb"

29

tidoo420

16h ago

Roger

5

Continue this thread 4 more replies

Continue this thread

apf6

1d ago

Love Claude Code. My wife does a lot of stuff in chat and I constantly notice little things that would be more successful if she did them in Claude Code instead.

On this idea of “non coding” work.. I think if you’re working on something ambitious, there is almost always some aspect that can be improved with code. Code is a huge force multiplier for so many situations.

24

ColdPlankton9273

1d ago

I fully agree with that. You make a great point that corrects what I was saying. I dont use it for "coding projects" - but it does write code.

6

2 more replies

Continue this thread

m3umax

1d ago

But then how do you chat with your system when on the go? That's the biggest drawback. Not having a nice mobile app to work away from home.

19

DigitalNonsense

23h ago

Claude dispatch is a new feature that just popped up for me today which seems like what you need.

16

2 more replies

Continue this thread 15 more replies

Continue this thread

• Promoted

Help AI systems understand your site with schema markup, metadata, and clean code — all within Webflow.

inque54

19h ago

Curious on why use code over cowork?

9

HedoNNN

17h ago

Same here

5

1 more reply

Continue this thread

WhichWayDidHeGo

14h ago

I use Claude Code for a ton of non-coding work too - music lyrics, novels, plays, a full musical, managing my Azure instances and personal PCs. But I've found Claude Code and claude.ai are genuinely better at different things, and leaning into that has been the move.

Writing is the big one. Ask Claude Code to write a book chapter and you get something functional. Ask claude.ai for the same chapter and it's noticeably better. Same with UX design, have claude.ai generate JSX mockups and they look better than I'd get from a UX designer. Claude Code produces the same components looking like a homework assignment from a freshman CS major. PowerPoints? Night and day. Claude.ai's deck output in the past month has been jaw-dropping.

I run Opus 4.6 on both. Same model, different results. The system prompt and tool stack behind claude.ai are clearly tuned differently than Claude Code's.

The difference was big enough that I built an MCP server where claude.ai can send messages directly to Claude Code instances and vice versa. No more copy-pasting between them. I use claude.ai for the creative/design work and Claude Code handles the infrastructure and execution, and they talk to each other.

8

v0id_flux_73

21h ago

same. haven't opened the web app in months. once you stop treating it as a conversation partner and start treating it as infrastructure, the whole mental model shifts. files become memory, filesystem becomes the database, markdown workflows become your operating system.

biggest unlock for me was persistent context. a good CLAUDE.md gets you maybe 60% of the way there but the real power is building up a working directory where the model can reference past decisions, project state, client context. stateless chat can't do any of that. you're basically starting from scratch every conversation.

the security angle in this thread concerns me though. giving an AI system-wide permissions to modify registry keys because it "fixed" your SMB issue is exactly the kind of thing that would get you fired at any company with real security practices. treat your AI infra with the same discipline as any automated system: least privilege, review before execution, rollback capability. "it worked" and "it was safe" are very different things.

7

Visible_Resource9503

1d ago

I use co-work. But never claude.ai

4

Things-n-Such

22h ago

Yes, I'm confused about this whole openclaw craze when Claude code does all of that and better.

4

2 more replies

Continue this thread

---

## View Post in

Português (Brasil)

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Accessibility Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.

Expand Navigation Collapse Navigation


id: 7b412b155b1c
title: So I tried using Claude Code to build actual software and it ...
source_url: https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1rx1l7d/so_i_tried_using_claude_code_to_build_actual/
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2026-03-19T01:00:12.171000+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-24T01:02:56.232784+00:00
scenario_type: 代码生成与审查
tools_used: ["Claude Code", "Railway"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["1842541e1ac9", "4a5ecb108ac0", "14e44e9fc58c", "8d0142693489", "2579f1fd2302"]
summary:
用户分享了使用Claude Code进行软件开发的经历——虽然在数据工程工作中表现出色，但在构建完整产品时遇到了挑战。讨论反映出AI辅助编程需要迭代式工作流、需求分解和人工审查，而非一次性生成完整应用。

raw_content:
So I tried using Claude Code to build actual software and it ...

So I tried using Claude Code to build actual software and it humbled me real quick : r/ClaudeCode Skip to main content So I tried using Claude Code to build actual software and it humbled me real quick : r/ClaudeCode

Go to ClaudeCode

r/ClaudeCode 5d ago

Azrael_666

# So I tried using Claude Code to build actual software and it humbled me real quick

A bit of context: I'm a data engineer and Claude Code has genuinely been a game changer for me. Pipelines, dashboards, analytics scripts, all of it. Literally wrote 0 code in the past 3 months in my full time job, only Claude Code.But I know exactly what it's doing and I can review and validate everything pretty easily. The exepreince has been amazing.

So naturally I thought: "if it's this good at data stuff, let me try building an actual product with it."

Teamed up with a PM, she wrote a proper PRD, like a real, thorough one, and I handed it straight to Claude Code. Told it to implement everything, run tests, the whole thing. Deployed to Railway. Went to try it.

Literally nothing working correctly lol. It was rough.

And I'm sitting there like... I see people online saying they shipped full apps with Claude Code and no engineering background. How?? What am I missing?? I already have a good background in software.

Would love to hear from people who've actually shipped something with it:

What's your workflow look like?

Do you babysit it the whole time or do you actually let it run?

Is there a specific way you break down requirements before handing them off?

Any tools or scaffolding you set up first?

Not hating on Claude Code at all, I literally cannot live without it, just clearly out of my depth here and trying to learn

Read more

Share

---

• Promoted

Speak to your AI Quest Master. Embark on quests. Shape the story. No installs, no downloads. Just your imagination and a browser.

---



Razzoz9966

5d ago

You can't one shot an app or software not even with CC or Opus on max level effort. It surely takes its time the better you want the results to be.

My workflow is to treat CC like a really fast developer but make my own decisions and think of features myself and oftentimes sanity check them together before handing off to implementation.

327



hopenoonefindsthis

5d ago

People don’t realise there is a ton of context that you need to give to the models that it’s literally impossible to do so in a single context window. You really have to break down and do it component by component and then iterate. Just like you would with a real project with human developers.

83



krzyk

5d ago

But he had PRD, as I understand this is quite big and specific.

13

10 more replies

Continue this thread 10 more replies

Continue this thread



MinimusMaximizer

5d ago

It does the Ralph loop with a developer and a reviewer agent and even then reviews the output before deploying or else it gets the slop again.

16



NikolasP98

5d ago

Put the Ralph loop on the code or it gets the slop again

13

1 more reply

Continue this thread 1 more reply

Continue this thread



HanzhoudaLaw

5d ago

Not even with a human being

21



MinimusMaximizer

5d ago

Reminds me a bit of the seahorse emoji test where all the major models fail it searching their own weights but then they immediately get it right once they actually search the web.

6

Continue this thread



lidlpainauchocolat

5d ago

You need to use CC exactly as you would code an app, so some knowledge is necessary. So like from scratch you figure out what things you want to use, then have claude code guide you through or set-up most of the skeleton of the app and the docker container. Then after thats set up go feature by feature, page by page. Use a whole context window for something like "have the navbar sticky on the top of this container" and then test it yourself. Its faster than if you did it yourself, but thats what gets me the best results just like you.

4

3 more replies

Continue this thread 12 more replies

Continue this thread



useresuse

5d ago

“implement everything” is where you went wrong. that bakes in soooooo many assumptions

41



AnyDream

5d ago

OP: "here's my prd, implement it. make no mistakes"

34

2 more replies

Continue this thread Continue this thread



Deep_Ad1959

5d ago

same boat. I build a macOS desktop app (Swift, accessibility APIs, screen capture stuff) and handing it a full PRD never works. what changed everything for me was writing really detailed CLAUDE.md specs with architecture decisions and constraints, then breaking the PRD into tiny vertical slices instead of letting it run on the whole thing at once.

fwiw the macOS agent I built with this approach is open source - fazm.ai/r

59



Icy-Pay7479

5d ago

So software engineering. I guess this might not be obvious to those who haven’t done it.

57



cynicalsaint1

5d ago

Right?

Everytime I read through these threads of people talking about how they're setting dozens of skills and use an entire roster of agents and written a novels worth of .mds i cant help but feel that I could have just grinded through the project bit by bit in a fraction of the time without any of that just using Claude as if were a junior dev while I handled the architecture and bits that require my years of product knowledge and subject matter expertise to avoid the pitfalls it tends into without.

17

1 more reply

Continue this thread Continue this thread



tehpoopsmith

5d ago

Keeping ADR docs have been a big help

4

6 more replies

Continue this thread

• Promoted

Queue up 5 tasks in Cowork and get back to the work only you can do.

Collapse video player



Infamous_Research_43

5d ago

My guy, none of us are one-shotting working apps. Anyone who you see claiming otherwise has no idea what they’re doing, and you went wrong by just listening to them.

What anyone who successfully ships with Claude Code does, is repeatedly test and fix. Like, continuously. This includes in production, however I never use Claude Code for anything actually important in production (no OAuth or tokens, no passwords, no user data, I only do local, offline, open source software)

It usually takes me several months to release something.

61



hopenoonefindsthis

5d ago

Funny because that’s also how development with human works.

7

1 more reply

Continue this thread 2 more replies

Continue this thread



codeedog

5d ago

I’ve been coding forever in government, startups, Fortune 500 sw vendors and at home for myself.

My favorite build process is:

prototype proof of concept

throw that away

architecture/design specs

implementation

write tests

debug (cycle through these last three)

checkpoint/stage/next project area

alpha and beta test

release

That’s a proper software engineering cycle for a product of any reasonable size. Claude can assist with many of these steps, but has difficulty being the creative force, loses the thread, misses DRY opportunities, misses deeper algorithmic opportunities when they aren’t obvious solid patterns, tends to fix by incremental patching (vs uplevel and look at potential larger issues). Essentially, it cannot always keep the big picture in mind where the “big picture” could mean different things at different levels within the system.

What it does really well is fast code generation from boilerplate, API syntax and semantics, code refactoring, and with close monitoring and coordination, bug identification, work around and fixing.

There’s nothing I’ve built with Claude so far that I haven’t been able to build myself, I’ve just done it 10x faster and not gotten bogged down in minutiae so deep that I’ve forgotten what I was doing. Yesterday, I encountered two bugs(!) running a terraform script against AWS to set up three S3 object stores. (I know what all of those words mean even if I don’t use those things very often). The system running the setup was hanging and debugging the problem required running tcpdump and curl; things I known how to do, but don’t know how to configure quickly or interpret the results from quickly. It may have taken me a few days to isolate problem one, then another few days to recognize problem two as separate from one and isolate it. Did it with Claude in 90 minutes. And, identified one bug as already filed and the other as unfiled.

And, for the first bug, there’s a simpler test to show it using ping. For the second bug, it only happens when modifying MTU and connecting to AWS but not other sites. But, it’s the OS I was running on and not AWS.

Claude saved me from spiraling on the project, as we implemented a workaround in pf (all on FreeBSD) that it devised.

It was a collaborative effort, but Claude led that one. I’ve lead others.

The point? Most of the work involved in building a product (vs the ML pipelines you’ve been doing) is in the sw engineering aspects, which Claude has yet to learn. It’ll get there, but not now.

29

2 more replies

Continue this thread



Foreign_Permit_1807

5d ago

Think of CC like a mid level engineer who is onboarding on to your codebase. How would you onboard them to your code base? You give incremental tasks. You don’t ask them to build an entire micro service at once. You define roadmaps, MTP, MVP etc. You review each milestone. Learn and document mistakes. Iterate. Similarly with CC, you split features into clearly defined tasks. You call the shots, ask the right questions, decide on trade offs like a senior engineer would.

10



jw_swede

5d ago

Make a plan for the design and functions , run the plan through third party LLMs, revise the plan. When you have a concept, make a new plan for the implementation. Run THAT plan through third party LLMs. Break it down in to stages and make every stage work before you move on to the next.

6

1 more reply

Continue this thread



UnifiedFlow

5d ago

No one gets good results doing what you did. Use a framework. Use orchestration. Focus on context engineering.

I recommend just installing GSD. It will be a massive improvement over "here implement".

There are many other ways / avenues for improving the context, outputs, and capabilities of claude code or any other agentic harness CLI. If you want everything handed to you on a platter-- GSD is the best I've found without requiring lots of setup or understanding of the framework(s).

Its all up to you and how you want to work/play. What are your goals? Whats your desired workflow/usage-pattern?

6

2 more replies

Continue this thread



Aggravating_Pinch

5d ago

The problem is not with you.You believed all those influencers who put up posts saying that they have a dream setup (agents, skills, hooks, etc.) and they give a brilliant spec to Claude code, went out to party.They came back and the app was working!

Guess what? You got scammed. There is no such thing.

You have to iterate tens, hundreds, thousands of times before the app becomes remotely useful or good.

Thank God for that. Otherwise, none of us would have our jobs.

6



Smokeey1

5d ago

You think its about one shotting it - leave claude and come back to pie. Its not

15



Ambitious_Spare7914

5d ago

Yeah, these aren't full self driving cars. They're more like a personal hovercraft.

9



Ok_Lavishness960

5d ago

yeah a personal hovercraft that drives really well but also tries to kill about 3 times a day and you gotta be ready to man the controls when it does.

11

12 more replies

Continue this thread Continue this thread Continue this thread



promethe42

5d ago

Instead of feeding a PRD, use the `superpowers` skill called `/brainstorming`. It will create the design and implementations plans that should be much more easier to digest. Plus it will automatically review those plans.

Still, the "0 shot product" is for simple, low engineering, no R&D products for now. `/brainstorming` does wonder at iterating on per-work item basis though.

9

2 more replies

Continue this thread

---

## View Post in

Français

Русский

日本語

हिन्दी

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Your Privacy Choices Accessibility Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.

Expand Navigation Collapse Navigation


id: a2015e583d5d
title: Learning to use AI coding tools is a skill, and pretending ...
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2026-03-17T01:00:12.171000+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-24T01:03:07.553375+00:00
scenario_type: 代码生成与审查
tools_used: ["Claude Code", "LLM"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["1842541e1ac9", "4a5ecb108ac0", "8d0142693489", "059dcd9ed4f2", "997ebe8dd738"]
summary:
文章讨论了使用Claude Code等AI编码工具的学习曲线和有效使用方法,强调AI工具需要不同的心智模型,以及保持批判性思维对获得生产力收益的重要性。作者基于一年的实际工程项目经验,指出AI编码工具的收益因人而异,需要开发相应的使用纪律来避免低质量输出的陷阱。

source_url:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1rv5gsk/learning_to_use_ai_coding_tools_is_a_skill_and/

raw_content:
Learning to use AI coding tools is a skill, and pretending ...

Learning to use AI coding tools is a skill, and pretending otherwise is hurting people's productivity : r/ClaudeCode Skip to main content Learning to use AI coding tools is a skill, and pretending otherwise is hurting people's productivity : r/ClaudeCode

Go to ClaudeCode

r/ClaudeCode 15h ago

ReiiiChannn

# Learning to use AI coding tools is a skill, and pretending otherwise is hurting people's productivity

I've been using Claude Code extensively on a serious engineering project for the past year, and it has genuinely been one of the most impactful tools in my workflow. This is not a post against AI coding tools.

But as my team has grown, I've watched people struggle in a way that I think doesn't get talked about honestly enough: using LLMs effectively for development requires a fundamentally different mental model from writing code yourself, and that shift is not trivial.

The vocal wins you see online are real, but they're not universal. Productivity gains from AI coding tools vary enormously from person to person. What looks like a shortcut for one engineer becomes a source of wasted hours for another — not because the tool is bad, but because they haven't yet developed the discipline to use it well.

The failure mode is subtle. It's entirely possible to work through a complex problem flawlessly by hand, yet produce noticeably lower quality output when offloading the same problem to an LLM — particularly when the intent is to skip the hard parts: the logical flow, the low-level analysis, the reasoning that actually builds understanding. The output looks finished. The thinking wasn't done.

What I've come to believe is that the most important thing hasn't changed: the goal is solid engineering, regardless of how you get there. AI tools don't lower that bar, they just change what it takes to clear it. The engineers on my team who use these tools well are the ones who stayed critical, stayed engaged, and never confused a coherent-looking output with a correct one.

The learning curve is real. It just doesn't look like a learning curve, which is what makes it dangerous.

> I'm not a good writer and this post is written with assistance from Claude. I won't share our conversation to avoid doxxing myself.

Read more

Share

---

• Promoted

Cut Code Review Time and Bugs in Half. Sign up for a free trial!

---

Hot-Butterscotch2711

12h ago

Been using Claude Code for a year and it’s a game changer. AI coding takes a different mindset and not everyone clicks with it. The output can look done even when the thinking isn’t. Staying critical is what matters.

14

http206

13h ago

The trouble with getting an LLM to generate your post text is that I've now been quite effectively trained to assume it's likely to be complete bullshit.

42

mi4L30ogDi34g54g1rfe

10h ago

I'm not a good writer

We can all tell, OP. No need to state it at the bottom. Maybe a disclaimer at the top next time.

7

1 more reply

Continue this thread

Muted-Arrival-3308

15h ago

And like with everything not everyone is actually able to deal with such a level of abstraction and think like an engineer. Coding is dead, engineering is not.

The whole IT is full of sub mediocre coders that won’t survive the next years and I couldn’t be happier.

33

Fuskeduske

13h ago

Sorry to burst your bubble, but a lot of the mediocre coders are running to AI and hiding behind it ( not saying good ones don't ), but i've seen a bigger influx of sub optimal colleagues using AI than i've seen what i consider the best ones at my workplace.

7

Muted-Arrival-3308

13h ago

In my experience AI just expose how mediocre some people are. It’s one thing to blindly prompt features and another thing to control the output.

9

4 more replies

Continue this thread 1 more reply

Continue this thread

Harvard_Med_USMLE267

14h ago

The nuance is that I’m not even sure engineering is a thing. I think Claude does most of my engineering at this point.

Whenever someone says ‘x skill is still important’ I always wonder a) can CC do it now b) if not, what’s the time frame

4

3 more replies

Continue this thread Continue this thread

• Promoted

Subscribe to Z.ai for fast, affordable coding AI with GLM models and MIT license.

e9n-dev

15h ago

I agree, it requires the same skills that are required in a good manager. Clarity, communication and prioritization

6

Deep_Ad1959

14h ago

this matches what I've seen building a macOS agent. the people who get the most out of it aren't better at prompting, they're better at decomposing problems. same skill that makes someone good at writing tickets or specs for junior devs. the ones who struggle tend to dump a vague goal and expect magic, then get frustrated when the output needs heavy rework.

fwiw the macOS agent i mentioned is open source - https://github.com/m13v/fazm

4

Sea-Reaction-841

13h ago

Not a dev but name worked as a tech project manager and product manager. Understanding all that goes into validating an idea, gearing it up for development and tracking metrics for it has been super helpful in knowing how to structure my framework within Claude code. I've shipped a few apps so far and I'm so excited to be l experience this revolution first hand.

How do you go about structuring your framework for CC? Fo you pull a repo from GitHub or did you create your own?

3

1 more reply

Continue this thread

HaagNDaazer

15h ago

Very much agree! As a developer who has been using Claude Code the last year or so, I've also realized and try to remind folks that that job has shifted from purely technical to technical manager. That our aim is now to communicate and manage our new "team" of agents and think like a good manager, identifying tool upgrades, communication pathways (I had to build a file based messaging system for Claude Agent teams cuz SendMessage is unreliable), and all these items that aren't necessarily coding, but improve the agent abilities at coding more effectively. So it becomes about managing and workflow engineering as much as it is about the actual code architecture and outcomes.

2

Ok_Chef_5858

11h ago

this is exactly right and it doesn't get said enough... i've seen it in our team too. the code runs, the PR looks clean, and three weeks later something breaks in a way nobody understands because nobody actually understood what was built.

what changed things for us was separating planning from building completely. i throw the idea at Claude first, tell it to roast everything, find edge cases, catch bad assumptions, poke holes until the plan is solid. then architect mode in Kilo Code to lay out the full structure before any code gets written...that separation forces the thinking to happen before the AI touches anything. the engineers who use it well on your team are probably also the ones who ask the AI to explain why, not just what. ask mode in Kilo is great for this, you can interrogate any part of the codebase without it changing anything. that's where the understanding gets rebuilt.

the learning curve being invisible is such a good way to put it. it looks like productivity, it feels like productivity, until it isn't.

2

ultrathink-art

10h ago

The skill that transfers most is knowing when NOT to trust the output — experienced devs review the diff, check edge cases, test failure paths even on AI-generated code. New users take 'looks good' at face value. That instinct gap accounts for most of the productivity difference I've seen.

3

LordOfTheDips

6h ago

Classic Claude response here

3

1 more reply

Continue this thread Continue this thread

• Promoted

One API. Send messages on all channels.

juzatypicaltroll

14h ago

I’m tired of carrying the team too. But I’ll be labelled a bad team player if I start to point out the weak links. Also don’t want to crush other people’s rice bowl but don’t want to keep carrying them.

1

MasterRuins

10h ago

Quality is the same here, my productivity went up by factor 25. My work hours increased and I get more migraine attacks regular and my brain sometimes doesn’t stop anymore and need some things to get me to rest. But I and super fast. 15 days session - 18 hours a day - no break gave me perfect code 3 of my Teams would have needed 5 months to produce. And TDD. And 100% test coverage, end to end, security, it makes everything 100% hours I wrote in my Arc42/ADRs/RFCs etc.

1

Archeelux

13h ago

Nah, you can gaslight yourself all you want, its a useful tool don’t get me wrong but at the same time its a random black box that outputs a different result each time you query it with the same prompt. Sure if you are “engineering” react templates then yeah anything beyond that I’d be super careful.

0

ghostmastergeneral

11h ago

Not sure what you’re trying to say here that contradicts OP. His post is literally about the care it takes to get good results from CC.

2

Archeelux

11h ago

My point is that is that you cant learn a bike that becomes a car suddenly

-1

Continue this thread 2 more replies

Continue this thread

Xanian123

14h ago

It's just are you a smart person or not. I don't think I've met a single generally non idiotic person look at claude code and respond with anything other than absolute disbelief. But I do hang out in decently tech and product heavy circles mostly

0

1 more reply

Continue this thread

typhon88

15h ago

It’s not a skill

It’s a skill the same way walking or speaking your native language is a skill

-8

semperaudesapere

14h ago

Way to tell everyone you vibecode without putting any thought into configs and advanced setup.

2

C0ckL0bster

12h ago

1.) those absolutely are skills, just learned then at such a young age you probably forgot what it was like to learn them.

2.) There's a difference between knowing words and vocabulary, and being able to effectively communicate an idea to another person let alone AI. Similar to the difference between walking and and running/sprinting for a small child vs a trained athlete. There are levels to these skills with varying effectiveness.

2

Continue this thread

ApeInTheAether

14h ago

I'm kinda sick of ppl dogging on cc, cuz most of the time is just a skill issue, literally. Not talking about any particular youtuber with 500k subs presenting his skill issues to wide audience as it's tool fault. /s

1

Maniacal-Maniac

12h ago

Just started working with Claude + GSD on a personal project this weekend and very impressed, and learned quite a bit about project planning from the workflows and docs that are being created.

I work closely with our devs and product managers , but never done those jobs myself, so it’s been pretty eye opening to be honest.

It’s an ambitious project, and no idea how it will actually turn out but it’s a personal non-monetized project anyway, so I see it as a learning experience more than anything.

I also have no plans to move into either of those roles, but having a better understanding is definitely going to help me working with them.

1

---

## View Post in

Français

Português (Brasil)

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Your Privacy Choices Accessibility Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.

Expand Navigation Collapse Navigation


id: 451059e9bdb9
title: 1Panel-dev/1Panel
source_url: https://github.com/1Panel-dev/1Panel
source_platform: github
author: 1Panel-dev
published_at: 2026-03-23T09:26:54+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-24T01:03:21.666147+00:00
scenario_type: 终端与CLI增强
tools_used: ["1Panel", "Docker", "OpenClaw", "Ollama", "OpenResty", "LNMP"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["84c9721be3eb", "0b5c4741d1c1", "e1e06f6feb29"]
summary:
1Panel是一个VPS管理和控制平台，提供Docker容器化部署、一键部署OpenClaw等功能，支持Linux服务器的可视化管理和自动化配置。该项目通过Web UI增强了终端操作效率，适用于服务器运维和本地基础设施管理场景。

raw_content:
1Panel-dev/1Panel

🔥 Take full control of your VPS with 1Panel. Deploy OpenClaw in one click.

Topics: 1panel, agent, clawdbot, copaw, docker, docker-ui, linux, lnmp, ollama, openclaw, openresty, webmin
Language: Go | Stars: 34510


id: 594ad704d680
title: [D] Exploring Local-First AI Workflow Automation
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2025-08-24T01:00:14.272000+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-24T01:03:41.215707+00:00
scenario_type: 工作流自动化
tools_used: ["Agentic Signal", "LLM", "open-source workflow automation"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["69bdfd293baf", "5a241dca4394", "de2ce3f50104", "4831c43f9ed8", "a34e783b92e8", "9d622833f3fc"]
summary:
用户展示了一个本地优先的AI工作流自动化开源项目,旨在提供隐私保护、资源高效的替代方案来替代Zapier和n8n等云工具,特别针对企业、合规性和数据敏感场景。该方案强调数据隐私、安全性、法规合规性和成本效率,适合对数据隐私有严格要求的企业和IoT/机器人系统。

source_url:
https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/1myr68a/d_exploring_localfirst_ai_workflow_automation/

raw_content:
[D] Exploring Local-First AI Workflow Automation

[D] Exploring Local-First AI Workflow Automation : r/MachineLearning Skip to main content [D] Exploring Local-First AI Workflow Automation : r/MachineLearning

/r/mlquestions or /r/learnmachinelearning , AGI - /r/singularity, career advices - /r/cscareerquestions, datasets - r/datasets" is-posting-restricted="" subreddittype="public"

Go to MachineLearning

r/MachineLearning 7mo ago

Code-Forge-Temple

# [D] Exploring Local-First AI Workflow Automation

[D] Exploring Local-First AI Workflow Automation

Hi all,

I’ve been experimenting with an open-source approach to AI workflow automation that runs entirely locally (no cloud dependencies), while still supporting real-time data sources and integrations. The goal is to provide a privacy-first, resource-efficient alternative to traditional cloud-heavy workflow tools like Zapier or n8n, but with LLM support integrated.

👉 My question for the community:How do you see local-first AI workflows impacting ML/AI research, enterprise adoption, and robotics/IoT systems where privacy, compliance, and cost efficiency are critical?

Repo: Agentic Signal(open-source, AGPL v3 / commercial dual license)

Demo video: YouTube link

Would love feedback from both the research and applied ML communities on potential use cases, limitations, or challenges you foresee with this approach.

Thanks!

Read more

Share

---

• Promoted

Dad jokes aside, the Samsung Galaxy Buds4 Pro engage full-spectrum Hi-Fi sound to heighten your senses.

Collapse video player

---



jpfed

7mo ago

I don't see local-first mattering much for research. My impression is that it's a much bigger deal for enterprise, though. My org is very hesitant to send our data over the wire to some third party.

1



Code-Forge-Temple

7mo ago

Great point! Local-first is definitely more critical for enterprise and organizations with strict data privacy requirements. For research, cloud tools can be convenient, but many companies need to keep sensitive data on-premises for compliance and security reasons.

`Agentic Signal` is designed to run entirely on your local machine, so your data never leaves your environment. This makes it easier for teams or individuals with privacy concerns to experiment with AI workflows without risking exposure to third-party services.

1

Continue this thread



jannemansonh

7mo ago

Why are you so focused on local-first?

1



Code-Forge-Temple

7mo ago

Local-first is important for several reasons:

Privacy: Sensitive data stays on your machine, reducing risk of leaks or exposure.

Security: No need to trust third-party servers with your information.

Compliance: Easier to meet regulatory requirements when data doesn’t leave your environment.

Reliability: Workflows aren’t dependent on internet connectivity or external service uptime.

Cost: No ongoing cloud fees for running AI models locally.

For many users—especially in enterprise or regulated industries—these factors make local-first a key feature.

1

Continue this thread



Feathered-Beast

15h ago

This is exactly what I’ve been working on with my project - an open-source AI agent automation platform ( 100+ stars ) that runs locally with multi-provider support and deterministic workflows.Cool to see more people pushing local-first in this space

github:- https://github.com/vmDeshpande/ai-agent-automation

website:- https://vmdeshpande.github.io/ai-automation-platform-website/

1

---

## View Post in

Português (Brasil)

Français

हिन्दी

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Accessibility OSA Information Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.

Expand Navigation Collapse Navigation


id: 545736cef961
title: Show HN: ProofShot – Give AI coding agents eyes to verify the UI they build
source_url: https://github.com/AmElmo/proofshot
source_platform: hackernews
author: jberthom
published_at: 2026-03-24T07:46:46+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-25T01:00:53.738230+00:00
scenario_type: 代码生成与审查
tools_used: ["ProofShot CLI", "Claude Code", "Cursor", "Codex", "agent-browser", "Vercel Labs"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["9db824473c2b", "6d32ae370100", "17ac3f66b4e9", "24717f8b983f"]
summary:
ProofShot是一个CLI工具，为AI编码智能体提供视觉反馈能力，使其能够在浏览器中验证生成的UI代码，并收集视频、截图和错误日志到自包含的HTML报告中。该工具与多种AI代理兼容，显著提高了AI驱动开发的效率，减少了手动浏览器验证的需求。

raw_content:
Show HN: ProofShot – Give AI coding agents eyes to verify the UI they build

I use AI agents to build UI features daily. The thing that kept annoying me: the agent writes code but never sees what it actually looks like in the browser. It can’t tell if the layout is broken or if the console is throwing errors.<p>So I built a CLI that lets the agent open a browser, interact with the page, record what happens, and collect any errors. Then it bundles everything — video, screenshots, logs — into a self-contained HTML file I can review in seconds.<p><pre><code>  proofshot start --run &quot;npm run dev&quot; --port 3000
  # agent navigates, clicks, takes screenshots
  proofshot stop
</code></pre>
It works with whatever agent you use (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, etc.) — it’s just shell commands. It&#x27;s packaged as a skill so your AI coding agent knows exactly how it works. It&#x27;s built on agent-browser from Vercel Labs which is far better and faster than Playwright MCP.<p>It’s not a testing framework. The agent doesn’t decide pass&#x2F;fail. It just gives me the evidence so I don’t have to open the browser myself every time.<p>Open source and completely free.<p>Website: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;proofshot.argil.io&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;proofshot.argil.io&#x2F;</a>


id: 6d9cca1de35e
title: [Question / Help] Development workflow with AI tools : r/vibecoding
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2026-01-18T00:00:00+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-25T01:01:42.775057+00:00
scenario_type: 工作流自动化
tools_used: ["Claude", "Cursor", "GitHub", "Jira", "Linear", "Google Docs", "Sheets", "Confluence", "Slack"]
novelty: similar
summary:
开发者寻求将AI工具集成到软件开发工作流中，当前采用Claude+Cursor的半自动化方式，但希望实现更深度的自动化集成，如直接连接文档系统、任务管理工具和PR评审流程。该场景涉及代码生成、反馈循环自动化和多工具集成，具有高实际应用价值和明确的自动化需求。

source_url:
https://www.reddit.com/r/vibecoding/comments/1qgnl64/question_help_development_workflow_with_ai_tools/

similar_to_ids:
["61a2b99fc903", "4a8b3582430c", "e1859e355e0c", "cc892671a906", "286e6147c6ae", "53435200c5ef", "914bbf5c72c1", "4188cb874081"]

raw_content:
[Question / Help] Development workflow with AI tools : r/vibecoding

[Question / Help] Development workflow with AI tools : r/vibecoding Skip to main content [Question / Help] Development workflow with AI tools : r/vibecoding

Go to vibecoding

r/vibecoding 2mo ago

hastyyyy

# [Question / Help] Development workflow with AI tools

Lately, I’ve had the feeling that I’m a bit behind the curve when it comes to AI-assisted workflows.

I am using AI daily, and it’s absolutely useful, but whenever I read threads or see demos from other people, it feels like some folks are already operating at a completely different level of automation and integration. So I figured I’d write this post to both describe how I currently work and ask: what are you all using, and how are you wiring things together?

Right now, my workflow looks roughly like this:

I take a ticket or task.

I write a fairly detailed spec, trying to be as explicit as possible about requirements, constraints, and expectations.

I feed that spec into Claude via Cursor and let it do most of the heavy lifting.

I re-prompt as needed to fix issues, improve structure, or clarify things it misunderstood.

Once I’m satisfied, I open a PR.

When feedback comes in from the team, I manually copy that feedback back into Claude/Cursor to continue the loop.

Sometimes there’s a bit of back-and-forth early on, especially if the task is underspecified. Other times, if I’m unhappy with certain parts of the output, I’ll just jump in and implement or rework those bits myself. This works fine, but it also feels… very manual.

From what I’ve seen, some people are already way beyond this:

Agents connected directly to docs (Google Docs, Sheets, Confluence, PDFs, etc.)

Agents that understand Jira boards or Linear tickets natively

PRs where the agent participates directly, reading comments and pushing follow-up commits

Semi-automated feedback loops where humans mostly review instead of orchestrating

Even cases where someone asks an agent in Slack to “implement what we just discussed” and it opens a PR on its own

In an ideal world, I’d love something like this:

I write a spec, including how things should be tested or validated.

I feed that to an agent, which implements the solution.

I review the result.

A PR is opened.

When feedback is added to the PR, the agent can read it directly and iterate, without me copy/pasting comments back and forth between GitHub and an AI tool.

For some categories of work, I’d even like to remove myself from the loop almost entirely. If the task is well-scoped and low-risk, I don’t necessarily need to be the middleman.

This is where I’d love input from people who are further along than I am:

Which tools currently enable workflows like this?

Are there specific platforms, agents, or integrations I should be looking into?

Are people building this themselves with APIs and glue code, or using off-the-shelf tools?

Thanks!

Read more

Share

---

• Promoted

Drive smarter decisions, accelerate innovation and create lasting impact with the hands-on learning and strategic vision at SAS Innovate. Register today!

---



PmMeSmileyFacesO_O

2mo ago

You can have codex do PR reviews. It's a setting somewhere.

1



Ok_Effect4421

2mo ago

I generally set up teams of agents in 3s - an architect, a developer and a reviewer. It is similar to what you describe, but perhaps a bit more structured? The architect writes the specification with me - I am working with a large codebase, so it takes my instructions and then develops a detailed design + implementation + testing plan.

The developer-reviewer follow that plan, keeping a log of what they do, as they go back and forth on failed tests.

The architect does a final review, and then prepares UAT testing for me.

It is mostly a disaster - it may generate the code in 15 minutes, but there are always a ton of errors. It will often forget to even deploy the code with the CD/CI pipeline. So then I am into a few hours, maybe a couple days, of debugging. Through iteration I can usually get what I want, but it is never remotely close autonomous.

I have pushed claude to launch 12 subagents - it crashed on me repeatedly - "prompt too long" - I think with that may subagents it just isn't able to compile all the responses it is getting.

So the most I can get with any level of efficiency is to run two of those teams I described, assuming they are working on completely separate part of my app.

My project is pretty complex, so perhaps that is part of the problem. I have defense in depth, a complex K8 cluster, multiple AI technologies and dynamic workload creation. These blow up the context window.

I could imagine creating a jira plug in and letting it run all night, but in my experience, it isn't going to help me. A half hour of coding can take a day to perfect and test. And it isn't worth me moving forward until the system is stable.

3



DigiBoyz_

2mo ago

tbh, my workflow isn't super complex either. i mostly use copilot as a smart autocomplete or for quick test generation. for bigger tasks, it's still me driving, with AI as a helpful co-pilot. still experimenting with deeper integrations tho, always learning.

1



valentin-orlovs2c99

2mo ago

That sounds like a pretty common spot to be in right now. A lot of the “fully automated” workflows you see are still cobbled together with custom scripts, API calls, and a fair bit of trial and error. Even with all the hype, most folks are still in the same boat: using AI for bursts of help, but keeping humans in the loop for anything meaningful.

If you do end up experimenting with connecting your AI tools more directly to your workflow—like letting them interact with tickets or PRs automatically—would be cool to hear what actually sticks (and what just turns into a maintenance headache). Sometimes the best “integration” is still a nice, predictable copy-paste.

1

Continue this thread



botapoi

2mo ago

tbh I understand it's moving so fast rn. for getting an mvp up quickly with ai assistance, i've been using blink.new with claude for stuff like this. it handles auth and the backend so you can focus on the actual app features, which feels pretty freeing

1



NeedleworkerMean2096

2mo ago

You're describing the exact pain point most teams hit, that manual handoff between AI and actual workflow tools. Check out github copilot workspace for prnative AI iteration or build custom workflows with langchain + github actions. For planning/specs before code, miro helps structure requirements that ai can actually parse well.

1



Shizuka-8435

2mo ago

Your workflow is already what most people are doing, so you’re not really behind. The big shift right now is spec driven development where the spec becomes the main source of truth and the AI works from that instead of lots of back and forth. Most of the really advanced setups are still custom or stitched together, and tools like Traycer can help keep specs, tasks, and feedback in one place so you don’t have to keep copy pasting everything.

1



Woclaw

28d ago

For more production-like applications i use Bmalph: https://github.com/LarsCowe/bmalph

1

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Your Privacy Choices Accessibility Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.

Expand Navigation Collapse Navigation


id: f6e28c87c6be
title: What's the best AI for “vibe coding” for someone who knows ... - Reddit
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2025-11-12T00:00:00+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-25T01:02:19.450650+00:00
scenario_type: 代码生成与审查
tools_used: ["Gemini", "Claude", "ChatGPT", "Lovable", "VSCode", "Claude Code", "GitHub", "Vercel", "Netlify"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["c853cd98108e", "479b12fd3591", "861656b00eb7", "0e4296f0f076"]
summary:
用户讨论了使用AI进行"vibe coding"的最佳工具选择,特别是如何处理大规模代码生成(5000-7000行)。社区推荐Claude和Lovable相比Gemini有更好的长代码处理能力,并提供了VSCode配合Claude的实际应用方案。

source_url:
https://www.reddit.com/r/vibecoding/comments/1ov5opt/whats_the_best_ai_for_vibe_coding_for_someone_who/

raw_content:
What's the best AI for “vibe coding” for someone who knows ... - Reddit

What’s the best AI for “vibe coding” for someone who knows almost NOTHING about programming? : r/vibecoding Skip to main content What’s the best AI for “vibe coding” for someone who knows almost NOTHING about programming? : r/vibecoding

Go to vibecoding

r/vibecoding 4mo ago

pgdm_

# What’s the best AI for “vibe coding” for someone who knows almost NOTHING about programming?

To give you guys some context, I accidentally got interested in programming when I was talking to Gemini and it suddenly suggested: “Would you like me to create a dashboard for that?”

Right there, it created a 300-line code all by itself, and I was blown away by that feature.

Fast-forward a few weeks, and now I have a 3,000-line tool. Every time I want to make a small change or add something, Gemini has to rewrite the entire code from scratch (super efficient, right?). It eventually couldn’t handle it anymore, so I had to split the code into two, then three parts, just so it could keep working on the project.

I’m not a dev or anything — I work in the industrial field — and sure, I could study programming, but honestly, I’d rather have something that can create longer code (like 5,000 lines) entirely from natural language. Eventually, I’ll need to merge these three codes into one big project, which I think would be around 7,000 lines — but I have no clue how to do that.

So, my dear devs, any advice, recommendations, or insults you want to throw my way? Is there any AI out there capable of handling longer code generation like this?

Read more

Share

---

• Promoted

Put a twist on your selfies with ChatGPT images.

---

Open_View9675

4mo ago

I learned coding from vibe coding. I started with chatGPT but quickly migrated to Claude. I have had great results with Lovable. Start with small, simple scripts with your initial ideas, then debugging will be easier for more complex codes.

4

ChanceKale7861

4mo ago

You truly can get these to teach and help validate real time if you can think critically.

Fantastic!

2

Continue this thread

[deleted]

4mo ago

Comment deleted by user

[deleted]

4mo ago

Second this. Using VSCode with Claude 4.5, works great.

8

AcoustixAudio

4mo ago

Third this. Generated code is super clean and well organised. Occasionally it gets stuck and needs directions, but works great

2

2 more replies

Continue this thread Continue this thread

pgdm_

4mo ago

Your posts are private, send me the link of it please

2

Ok-Sheepherder7898

4mo ago

What does claude cost? I've always been curious what plan you need to use it consistently.

2

klopppppppp

4mo ago

$20-200 per month, and you can use Claude Code in the web and in local CLI, but with the $20 plan you’ll creep on on limits in 5 hour and weekly windows, and can monitor it in their dashboard.

You set up a GitHub repository and link it in Claude Code web or your CLI. If you use something like Vercel or Netlify, you can set up a project there and link it to your repo, and then when you make changes and it pushes to your repo, they are available on the web via your Vercel/Netlify project.

Runner up for me is the new vibe coding upgrade inside of aistudio.google.com - it’s pretty straightforward and even offers suggestions that you can tap on to generate prompts, often for features you wouldn’t even have thought of before.

4

4 more replies

Continue this thread 1 more reply

Continue this thread 3 more replies

Bob5k

4mo ago

https://github.com/Bob5k/Awesome-Vibecoding-Guide

6

• Promoted

YSK: Codecademy makes coding jobs attainable. Start learning.

Harvard_Med_USMLE267

4mo ago

Just pay for claude code and learn how to use it.

Most of the advice here is very wrong. It was correct in 2023, not in 2025.

No you do t need to learn how to code.

No, there is no “wall” at 3000 lines of code, or at 300 000 lines. You just need to learn how to use the tools.

No, debugging is not an issue.

Get cc, and start building serioys stuff (5000 lines is still an app for ants!)

2

BitRevolutionary9294

4mo ago

Trae Solo is currently free, just gonna test it. Warp. Kilo Code so you can choose models and learn more about them. Also they had some frees hit from time to time because they use OpenRouter.

2

1 more reply

Continue this thread

Gullible-Question129

4mo ago

when you find out make sure to tell us as software engineers can be completely replaced by that and i hear their salaries are quite high. keeping this thread bookmarked

4

Veurori

4mo ago

That comes later. First there will be 10 reddit posts about new revolutionary app that can change the world fully vibe coded ready to make millions, then there will be post about useless software engineers and then "how to get rid of 100k $ debt from hacked API" that was just stuck in infinite while loop.

2

AntiqueCauliflower39

4mo ago

This is simply not the case for most software developers. For example, you think creating an app with 10k lines of code is a lot, some enterprise software companies I’ve worked for have like 14 applications that all have 100k+ lines of code and very complex business logic that all talk to each other in some fashion. I’d love to see Claud try and solve problems and rewrite the entire application portfolio when something goes wrong

2

pgdm_

4mo ago

haha fair enough. I would love to afford a DEV for my personal projects, unfortunately thats not the case. I think ill study a little bit about code structure so i can modify or add some features by adding blocks of code in an existing code.

1

1 more reply

Continue this thread Continue this thread

Alternative-Bar-4654

4mo ago

i would recommend claude code or codex.but if u need some no code tool, website is definitely lovable, for no code creating mobile apps mobilable

2

Awakekiwi2020

4mo ago

I'm using lovable and 3 apps made in 2 weeks and it just gets better and better.

2

LonelyContext

4mo ago

This is the way.

2

Continue this thread

• Promoted

No coding required. Create, test & launch your own game today.

AcoustixAudio

4mo ago

Why not learn something about code? What's wrong with learning and using AI?

1

Harvard_Med_USMLE267

4mo ago

Because you don’t really need to now, and it takes years to get good enough at code to be useful. By which stage LLMs will be much better.

1

BigNillyStyle

4mo ago

That’s a load of rubbish. I’m a software engineer and i have started using Claude code and it’s rubbish. It may look like good code to people who don’t code, but it’s not.

1

1 more reply

Continue this thread 3 more replies

Continue this thread Continue this thread

Born_Possibility_305

4mo ago

Truth is ultimately all vibe coders will be forced to learn the language to fix the bugs or for debugging.

1

7 more replies

Continue this thread

Stunning_Spare

4mo ago

I don't think LLM is designed to spit out long codes, every time you let it touch your sensitive code, it has chance to knock it down. I vibe code desktop stuff, and started with different layers of structure, ui/ core/ service/ , and let ai handle only tiny part of it. 50 files, 8000 lines of codes.

it's a pain to dissect spaghetti code, and with spaghetti, it's hard to grow bigger.Claude if you can afford it. I let Claude review blueprint generated by Gemini.

0

Harvard_Med_USMLE267

4mo ago

You’re wrong, you just need learn how to use it and use proper tools (CC).

250K lines of code here, no dramas.

2

3 more replies

Continue this thread Continue this thread

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Your Privacy Choices Accessibility Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.

Expand Navigation Collapse Navigation


id: 6a3df6ad680d
title: Show HN: Record manual QA flows, get E2E test code that fits your repo
source_url: https://quretests.com
source_platform: hackernews
author: mihau
published_at: 2026-03-24T15:40:01+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-25T01:02:33.228080+00:00
scenario_type: 代码生成与审查
tools_used: ["Qure", "Playwright", "Claude Code", "AI agents", "Desktop app", "Built-in browser"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["9db824473c2b", "545736cef961", "6d32ae370100"]
summary:
Qure是一款JetBrains开发的E2E测试代码生成工具，通过记录用户在内置浏览器中的操作流程，利用AI agent自动生成适配现有代码库的测试代码。该工具通过匹配项目代码库、识别页面对象和辅助函数，以及实时运行和修复测试来确保生成代码的准确性，特别适合存在完整测试基础设施的大型项目。

raw_content:
Show HN: Record manual QA flows, get E2E test code that fits your repo

TLDR: Desktop app for E2E web test generation, built at JetBrains (closed beta). Record the flow in a built-in browser - the agent matches it with your existing codebase, then writes a test that passes, not a draft to debug.<p>Devs use AI to ship more code. That code still needs testing. If your team writes E2E tests by hand, you have a problem - same QA capacity, way more surface to cover.<p>AI agents can write E2E test code, but you&#x27;re stuck describing flows in text - the agent clicks around via Playwright MCP, takes wrong turns, you re-prompt, retry. 30 minutes for a flow you could click through in 30 seconds.<p>Qure works differently. You record the scenario in Qure&#x27;s built-in browser by just using your product. The AI turns that recording into code. No prompt engineering, no MCP setup, no explaining your repo in chat - point it at your project and go. Beyond recording, you can also refactor tests, update them, or write new ones from a description.<p>What keeps the AI output grounded:<p>- We match the recording against your codebase - find your page objects, helpers, constants and feed them to the agent instead of hoping it figures out your repo<p>- When agent runs the test, it reads real failure output, fixes with actual error and app context<p>This is a closed beta of an experimental product. Web only, works best with Playwright. If your project has a few dozen tests - Claude Code will honestly get you there. Qure makes a difference on larger codebases with existing test infrastructure.<p>5-min demo: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=4CZw4bSSDCE" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=4CZw4bSSDCE</a><p>Try the beta: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;quretests.com" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;quretests.com</a><p>Happy to answer any questions about the approach, product, or where it breaks - I&#x27;m the dev on the Qure team. Egor (@250xp), who leads the project, is in the thread too.


id: cdd9904cc56c
title: Show HN: Claude's Code – tracking the 19M+ commits generated by Claude on GitHub
source_url: https://www.claudescode.dev/
source_platform: hackernews
author: phantomCupcake
published_at: 2026-03-24T11:55:54+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-25T01:02:44.943865+00:00
scenario_type: 数据分析与可视化
tools_used: ["Next.js", "Recharts", "PostgreSQL", "GitHub API", "BigQuery", "GraphQL API"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["4762c1e8251d"]
summary:
该项目构建了一个仪表板来追踪GitHub上由Claude Code生成的1900万+提交,展示了代码生成工具的实际应用规模和分布。项目采用Next.js+Recharts+PostgreSQL技术栈,解决了GitHub API限流问题,构建了搜索和数据富化相结合的ETL管道来处理大规模数据摄入。这是一个兼具技术深度和实用价值的数据分析项目,清晰展现了AI代码生成工具的影响力。

raw_content:
Show HN: Claude's Code – tracking the 19M+ commits generated by Claude on GitHub

I was curious about the amount of code on GitHub that is generated with Claude Code, and this is my attempt at finding that answer.<p>Spoiler alert: It&#x27;s a lot - around 19M commits by my count<p>In a nutshell it is a dashboard that presents some basic, and hopefully, interesting stats about commits signed by Claude Code on GitHub - in public repos.<p>Not all commits are signed (via the author field, or a commit &quot;trailer&quot;), and many repos are private, which means Claude&#x27;s reach is probably wider than what you see here. But I think it&#x27;s enough to see the spread and learn a bit about how it&#x27;s used.<p>Technology wise, it&#x27;s a pretty basic Next.js app with Recharts for graphing and PostgreSQL for the DB. I started off with using BigQuery because I estimated I would need the analytical scale, but I eventually pivoted to Postgres because the small writes, and frequent reads for deduplication became too expensive.<p>The ingestion&#x2F;backfill job is the more interesting part since I went from severely under-engineering it (start smol and all that) to ending up with a bare-bones, but capable, ETL pipeline.<p>Primarily, the challenge to overcome in reading the data, was GitHub&#x27;s rate limits - both on their search API, and on their GraphQL API. On search it&#x27;s 30 req&#x2F;min, on GraphQL it&#x27;s 5000 req&#x2F;hour - per access token. Because of this difference, and response time differences, I split the work:<p><pre><code>  1. There is a batch of search workers that write basic commit info to a table - paging and splitting to find as many of the commits as we can.

  2. Enrichment workers read from that table and fill in some of the info that we can&#x27;t see in the search. Lines added&#x2F;deleted, and repo information, is added this way.
</code></pre>
There is a bit of lag in reading these commits currently, and it is still pulling historical commits, which is why the most recent dates are a bit low on commits, and why some repos don&#x27;t yet have a language set yet.<p>I wouldn&#x27;t say it&#x27;s 100% done - I want to improve the ingestion still, and I think there is more I can extract from the data - but I have definitely enjoyed looking at what I have so far.<p>Let me know if you have an idea for what I can add to the dashboard, or can think of something else I should also be reading.<p>For some more info on my methodology and the evolution of the backfill job, head to the About page. :-)


id: c72959eb8ed0
title: Built an automation system that lets Claude Code work on ... - Reddit
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2025-11-02T00:00:00+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-25T01:03:09.815513+00:00
scenario_type: 工作流自动化
tools_used: ["Claude Code CLI", "GitHub Issues", "Git", "Godot", "Python", "Rust", "React", "Django"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["cc892671a906", "286e6147c6ae", "4188cb874081", "220851dd1119"]
summary:
用户构建了Lazy Bird自动化系统，让Claude Code CLI在工作时间自主处理个人项目任务，通过GitHub Issues驱动、Git隔离和自动化测试实现完整的开发工作流。该系统支持15+框架，解决了Claude Code CLI的多项技术挑战，显著提高了开发效率和自动化程度。

source_url:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1omq702/built_an_automation_system_that_lets_claude_code/

raw_content:
Built an automation system that lets Claude Code work on ... - Reddit

Built an automation system that lets Claude Code work on my projects while I'm at my day job - Lazy Bird v1.0 : r/ClaudeAI Skip to main content Built an automation system that lets Claude Code work on my projects while I'm at my day job - Lazy Bird v1.0 : r/ClaudeAI

Go to ClaudeAI

r/ClaudeAI 5mo ago

Critical-Pea-8782

# Built an automation system that lets Claude Code work on my projects while I'm at my day job - Lazy Bird v1.0



 

github.com Open

Like many of you, I'm a developer with a day job who dreams of working on personal projects (game dev with Godot). The problem? By the time I get home, I'm exhausted and have maybe 2-3 hours of productive coding left in me.

I tried several approaches:

Task queues - Still required me to be at the computer

Claude Code web version - This was frustrating. It gives results somewhere between Claude.ai chat and actual Claude Code CLI, often deletes my tests, and doesn't understand proper implementation patterns

So I built Lazy Bird - a progressive automation system that lets Claude Code CLI work autonomously on development tasks while I'm at work.

How it works: I create GitHub issues in the morning with detailed steps, the system picks them up, runs Claude Code in isolated git worktrees, executes tests, and creates PRs if everything passes. I review PRs during lunch on my phone, merge in the evening.

Technical challenges solved:

Claude Code CLI's undocumented flags (turns out`--auto-commit` doesn't exist, had to use`-p` flag properly)

Test coordination when multiple agents run simultaneously

Automatic retry logic when tests fail (Claude fixes its own mistakes)

Git isolation to prevent conflicts

Started with Godot specifically but expanded to support 15+ frameworks (Python, Rust, React, Django, etc.). You just choose your framework during setup and it configures the right test commands.

Just released v1.0 - Phase 1 (single agent) is working. Currently implementing Phase 2 (multi-agent coordination).

Check the roadmap for what's coming. Would love feedback from others using LLMs for actual development automation!

Read more

Share

---

• Promoted

Postmark: Email delivery that works.

---



ClaudeAI-mod-bot

5mo ago

If this post is showcasing a project you built with Claude, please change the post flair to Built with Claude so that it can be easily found by others.

1



pdwhoward

5mo ago

Why not just use @claude built into GitHub?

25



ghotinchips

5mo ago

API fees for that, right?

1



Bonteq

5mo ago

No, you can authenticate using Claude Code's `/install-github-app` command.

1

3 more replies

Continue this thread Continue this thread



luckyone44

5mo ago

Asked the same in a previous post, but no answer

1

Continue this thread



East-Present-6347

5mo ago

" I create GitHub issues in the morning with detailed steps" - what is your process?

6



TigNiceweld

5mo ago

Have you tested it with the limited Claude Pro?

4

• Promoted

Des parties ultra-rapides, zéro lag, zéro stress. Voyez comment vos serveurs peuvent enfin suivre votre niveau de jeu.



UteForLife

5mo ago

How fast will this eat up Max20 usage?

4



Sidion

5mo ago

How does it handle decisions or conflicts? What happens if testing takes longer than it can idle? How does it resume? How does it ensure tests pass? Claude often will show that tests are "failing for reasons not related to these changes so I will disable them" and then disable them and get the tests to pass. Do you have any guardrails? Also you're using work trees, is there any concern with it installing packages? Do you run it on a dedicated VM or something?

4



Fstr21

5mo ago

non-coder, not entirely sure what Im doing but I can keep an eye on this for myself my use would be overnight usage while im sleeping, that would be cool for my project.

6



Critical-Pea-8782

5mo ago

more power to you :) if you have any feedback ı am always here thank you for your interest :D

2

Continue this thread



johnerp

5mo ago

Can I use this with Gemini cli?

2



jimtoberfest

5mo ago

OP, you checked out Huntley’s Ralph style coding loop? May be worth a look.

2



Muted_Farmer_5004

5mo ago

This is stupid on many levels.

-13



Critical-Pea-8782

5mo ago

I am curious actually can you share what's not really add ons 🤔🙂

7



Predatedtomcat

5mo ago

Why ? There are use cases there , I was thinking of to build exactly like OP , 3 main reasons

That list of issues can be anywhere ex : jira, linear , email etc . It does not have to be on github @claude

You have limited free use and priced for compute for Claude running on github runners , you don’t have this problem in your local environment

With limited code change you can possibly make two Claude code instances running on two different machine talk to each other like one machine saying I am done with creating story for YouTube and ask second one to make the video and store in Filesystem on local machine.

I would even extend this since Claude web UI for coding is running on Claude cloud we don’t need to pay for it , you can initiate a task to it wrapping it around electron or some computer use api or browser like comet . When you get any number of VMs for free with so much compute and RAM why not use it effectively? The same can then be used for codex, Jules , GitHub agents , cursor etc for free when you are on their pro plans.

https://www.reddit.com/r/GithubCopilot/comments/1olc93c/for_anyone_interested_in_vmcontainer_details/

I believe this is the future with us (humans)writing project name and description and Claude coming with list of tasks and issues being added to a board or anywhere like Jira, github, email , slack , service desk , customer feedback form for an app , and we can change it or comment on it if necessary . Then it spinning up multiple Claude instances to finish it .

Writing hello world program with custom words might be to senior developers but that’s how we start to learn . There is nothing stupid to make or build if it you or even one other person finds it useful.

1

Continue this thread



AI_should_do_it

5mo ago

Nice work, check your DM.

1



Too_Many_Flamingos

5mo ago

!remindme 7 days

1



heo001997

4mo ago

Niceee, I wonder how could we use this system for a big task which needs update-review continuosly until the task is 100% clear for development

1



Critical-Pea-8782

4mo ago

We can add one single OR request hook and if it not pass add comment and put task back to ready again so you just control which task to put in ready

1

Continue this thread

[deleted]

5mo ago

Comment removed by moderator

0



RemindMeBot

5mo ago

I will be messaging you in 7 days on 2025-11-09 21:03:38 UTC to remind you of this link

3 OTHERS CLICKED THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.

Parent commenter can delete this message to hide from others.

---

| Info | Custom | Your Reminders | Feedback |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

0

Continue this thread

---

## View Post in

हिन्दी

Русский

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Accessibility Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.

Expand Navigation Collapse Navigation

Let us know your cookie preferences

Reddit uses cookies and similar technologies to:

- Keep the website operational and running properly
- Prevent fraud and abuse
- Monitor site usage and performance metrics

If you choose “Accept All” we’ll also use cookies to:

- Personalize your recommendations and ads
- Measure the performance of ads
- Develop and improve new features and services

If you choose “Reject Optional Cookies” we won’t use cookies for these additional uses. You can update your cookie preference from your settings.

Learn more about how Reddit uses cookies.

Accept All Reject Optional Cookies


id: a136b5ba4f7c
title: Has anyone here used OpenClaw in a real production workflow yet?
summary: 用户讨论OpenClaw在真实生产环境中的应用情况，包括成本效益平衡、模型可靠性和自动化工作流程管理。涵盖项目管理、营销情报和内容监控等实际使用案例，但存在成本高、准确性不稳定的痛点。
source_url: https://www.reddit.com/r/openclaw/comments/1qv3yl5/has_anyone_here_used_openclaw_in_a_real/
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2026-02-03T00:00:00+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-27T01:01:15.971578+00:00
scenario_type: 工作流自动化
tools_used: ["OpenClaw", "Claude", "Kimi K2.5", "MiniMax", "Opus", "Todoist", "Allegretto"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids:
["812ad789aa06", "0ed02b58229f", "a4713fb9eb43", "34bb15285d1f", "4831c43f9ed8", "3d01ae2ffc82", "628765deddd5", "9d8451ba2dcd"]

raw_content:
Has anyone here used OpenClaw in a real production workflow yet?

Has anyone here used OpenClaw in a real production workflow yet? : r/openclaw Skip to main content Has anyone here used OpenClaw in a real production workflow yet? : r/openclaw

Go to openclaw

r/openclaw 2mo ago

Downtown-Barnacle-58

# Has anyone here used OpenClaw in a real production workflow yet?

I've gone through a bunch of demos and posts, but I'm trying to understand how OpenClaw is performing in **real, day-to-day use** rather than just PoCs and weekend experiments.

For those of you actually running it:

- What concrete workflows are you using it for (lead gen, reporting, monitoring, ops, something else)?

- How long did it take you to go from "this is cool" to "I trust this enough to let it run without babysitting"?

- Any pain points around stability, cost (APIs vs local), or maintenance that you wish you'd known earlier?

I'm especially interested in use cases where OpenClaw replaced a human/VA or a stack of smaller tools. If you're willing to share a short breakdown of your setup and results, that would be incredibly helpful.

Read more

Share

---

• Promoted

AI Chaos Is Real. Gartner Explains Why DAPs Are the Key to Control.

---



DrJupeman

2mo ago

My arc: "this is insane" -> "this is kind of expensive" -> "this isn't very good on cheap models" -> "this kind of works well on K2.5 but is making so many mistakes I can't trust it" -> "this is too expensive for the mistakes to replace me just talking to Claude Opus on subscription"

20



DrewGrgich

2mo ago

Love this. My arc is similar but I have settled into satisfied amazement. I’m launching a card game on Kickstarter in Sept/Oct and my OC server Clyde is my project manager. He is 100% helping me organize my work and track next steps. He is providing next steps via Todoist and grading my progress. We worked out a system for using filters for me to measure the impact of individual tasks so he can help present priorities. I started with Kimi K2.5 so the cost was the $39/month Allegretto plan. I’m now using MiniMax more for $20/month. I do spring a couple dollars for time with Opus when I want to feel like I’m working with a true human. Kimi and Opus built my website last night after Kimi found a good landing page skill for Claude to use. We launch the site tonight.

6

2 more replies

Continue this thread



syphax

2mo ago

That’s where I’m at now. Either affordable and kind of dumb, or pretty good but too expensive!

2



dcc_1

2mo ago

Were you using K2.5 for coding? Or your main openclaw LLM?

1

1 more reply

Continue this thread



Downtown-Barnacle-58

2mo ago

This resonates—I'm hitting the same cost-to-trust wall right now.

I'm looking at OpenClaw for ongoing marketing intelligence work (competitor tracking, message monitoring, content opportunity detection) but can't justify the premium model costs if it's still going to need constant supervision. The cheap models feel too unreliable for anything that runs autonomously.

What were the specific types of mistakes K2.5 was making that killed your trust? Was it more about accuracy/hallucinations, or was it breaking workflows/taking wrong actions?

Also curious if you found any sweet spot between cost and reliability—or did you just decide the juice wasn't worth the squeeze for your use case?

Would love to hear more about what you were trying to automate if you're open to chatting—mind if I DM you? Trying to figure out if this is worth the investment or if I should stick with simpler automation.

1

Continue this thread



DeviousCham

2mo ago

it's only been out for a week, dawg. No.

6



Downtown-Barnacle-58

2mo ago

Got you Brother!

1

Continue this thread



Tgbrutus

2mo ago

Running it in production for a few months now. Here's what stuck:

Use cases:

Lead gen scanning (forums, communities)

DB sync between agents (Supabase backend)

Heartbeat-driven background tasks (checking inbox, calendar, notifications)

Research and summarization workflows

Video production with Google Flow (prompting, iteration)

Code generation and automation scripts

Time to trust: About 2-3 weeks of tweaking SOUL.md and HEARTBEAT.md. The "aha" moment was realizing the agent needs explicit checklists, not vague goals. Now it runs 24/7 with minimal intervention.

Pain points:

Context window fills up on long sessions - memory flush helps

Cost: ~€425/month (dedicated server + Google AI Ultra) - not cheap but worth it for our workflow

Initial setup takes time, but pays off once dialed in

What replaced human work: Manual monitoring, lead tracking, repetitive research, boilerplate coding. Saved maybe 4-6 hours/day.

1



Downtown-Barnacle-58

2mo ago

This is super helpful—appreciate the breakdown.

I'm trying to figure out how to use OpenClaw for marketing automation at my company—specifically things like tracking competitor mentions, monitoring industry conversations for content ideas, and analyzing what messaging is actually resonating in forums vs. what we're putting out.

Have you used it for any competitive intelligence or marketing strategy work? Or is your setup mostly focused on the operational/outbound side?

Also curious how you're structuring the agent workflows for this—are you running multiple specialized agents that feed into each other, or more of a single generalist setup?

Would love to pick your brain on this if you're open to it—mind if I DM you?

1

[deleted]

2mo ago

Comment removed by moderator

1

1 more reply

Continue this thread Continue this thread

• Promoted

One-Click Deploy. 500+ models. Free to host!



TanguayX

2mo ago

I’m using it as sort of a Blender ‘wingman’. I’m working on some pipelines and getting some work out and it’s writing addons in the background while I work to remove friction. Also using it as the best helpdesk ever.

1



Lame_Johnny

2mo ago

IT wont let us install it

1



Careful_Brilliant_85

2mo ago

Is it against Claude code tos rules to let your open claw bot code in max account? Is anyone doing that to automate coding projects?

1

1 more reply

Continue this thread



Beautiful_Web_5771

2mo ago

I'm getting a morning brief on the new stuff going on in my field with a proposed text of a Linkedin Post

I'm getting a morning brief of my LinkedIn chats (I have many of them) that I need to follow up on

I'm getting timesheets from people, and then they submit their invoices (contractors) - I have a process drawn up in Miro, took a screenshot and gave it to my bot + some pointers. It took the timesheet, messages from contractors and cross-referenced to confirm the numbers are the same, then generated a summary I sent to my client as an invoice attachment. I wasn't brave enough yet to give it access to my finance system to submit invoice on it's own... but maybe in the future.

So far, I consider Clawd to do stuff I was never patient enough to develop in Make or n8n with a power of Codex

1



xyzsomething

2mo ago

Oh god no, it’s a play thing, it’s really fun but I’d be scared to death to put it in any sort of business

1



adribabe

2mo ago

Theoretically, yes, as in the bot works, but the human doesn't (I was almost killed in a bad car accident that's taking months to recover from).

Before the accident, my flow was:

Customers fill out a form on my website for pricing

I look everything up.

I fill out a template.

I email the customer the completed template.

Sometimes I reply within the hour, and get the job 90% of the time.Sometimes I reply within a day or two, and get the job 50% of the time.

When I'm working again, the workflow will be different:

Customer fills out form which now also goes to bot via IMAP / email.

Bot connects via an API to get pricing.

Bot fills out a template.

Bot sends me the template via telegram.

I review and copy/paste the templated response to the customer.

Eventually when i trust the bot enough, it will be able to email the customer itself, but... I want to make sure it's reliable first, and unfortunately, while it's ready to get working, I'm not.

Quick tip for anyone reading this: I had a terrible time trying to get this to work with GPT-5. Then I noticed GPT-5.1 was the same pricing, switched to that. Problems were solved pretty quickly after that.

If anyone has tips or suggestions please leave them. I won't be able to try this in a real work context for a while, but it's nice to know the bot is ready even if I'm not.

1

6 more replies

Continue this thread

[deleted]

2mo ago

Comment removed by moderator

1



AutoModerator

2mo ago

Hey there, I noticed you are looking for help!

→ Check the FAQ - your question might already be answered → Join our Discord, most are more active there and will receive quicker support!

Found a bug/issue? Report it Here!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

Continue this thread

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Accessibility Impressum Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.

Expand Navigation Collapse Navigation

Let us know your cookie preferences

Reddit uses cookies and similar technologies to:

- Keep the website operational and running properly
- Prevent fraud and abuse
- Monitor site usage and performance metrics

If you choose “Accept All” we’ll also use cookies to:

- Personalize your recommendations and ads
- Measure the performance of ads
- Develop and improve new features and services

If you choose “Reject Optional Cookies” we won’t use cookies for these additional uses. You can update your cookie preference from your settings.

Learn more about how Reddit uses cookies.

Accept All Reject Optional Cookies


id: 6f85eeb4bc23
title: Show HN: Nit – I rebuilt Git in Zig to save AI agents 71% on tokens
source_url: https://justfielding.com/blog/nit-replacing-git-with-zig
source_platform: hackernews
author: fielding
published_at: 2026-03-26T03:14:54+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-27T01:01:31.284310+00:00
scenario_type: 代码生成与审查
tools_used: ["Git", "Zig", "AI agents"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["eee0462e22ad", "344d46b0f790", "13cd4b0bb68a", "059dcd9ed4f2"]
raw_content: Show HN: Nit – I rebuilt Git in Zig to save AI agents 71% on tokens
summary:
开发者用Zig重新实现Git，优化AI代理的token使用效率，相比原生Git减少71%的token消耗。这是一个针对AI辅助编程工作流的工具优化项目，通过改进版本控制工具来降低与AI模型交互的成本。


id: d3c626ef2158
title: What AI tool became part of your daily workflow? : r/automation
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2026-03-06T00:00:00+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-27T01:02:19.146687+00:00
scenario_type: 工作流自动化
tools_used: ["AI meeting notes summarizer", "AI email/content drafter", "AI ticket categorization system"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["0ed02b58229f", "5a241dca4394", "286e6147c6ae", "de2ce3f50104", "fb050128f45f"]
summary:
用户分享了在日常工作中集成AI工具的经验，包括会议记录总结、邮件和内容草稿生成、以及支持工单分类。这些应用展示了AI在提高工作效率和自动化重复任务方面的实际价值，尽管缺乏具体的实现细节和量化的业务成果指标。

source_url:
https://www.reddit.com/r/automation/comments/1rmdnvk/what_ai_tool_became_part_of_your_daily_workflow/

raw_content:
What AI tool became part of your daily workflow? : r/automation

What AI tool became part of your daily workflow? : r/automation Skip to main content What AI tool became part of your daily workflow? : r/automation

Go to automation

r/automation 10d ago

SMBowner_

# What AI tool became part of your daily workflow?

I have been experimenting with AI tools lately and it’s amazing how much they can automate in daily work.

For example, I’m using:

AI to summarize meeting notes

AI to draft emails or blog outlines

AI to categorize and sort support tickets

I feel like there are so many other useful AI tools I might be missing.

Read more

Share

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Your Privacy Choices Accessibility Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.

Expand Navigation Collapse Navigation


id: 122cd710ae8a
title: Show HN: Τ³-Bench is out – can agents handle complex docs and live calls?
source_url: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47520448
source_platform: hackernews
author: victorbarres
published_at: 2026-03-25T17:26:01+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-27T01:02:39.507342+00:00
scenario_type: 数据分析与可视化
tools_used: ["τ³-Bench", "GPT-5.2", "OpenAI", "Gemini", "xAI", "voice agents"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["75541a4dc03b", "4762c1e8251d"]
summary:
τ³-Bench是一个开源基准测试框架，用于评估AI代理在复杂文档检索和实时语音交互等场景中的性能，涵盖700+相互关联的政策文档和现实语音条件。研究发现瓶颈不在检索而在复杂推理和动作执行顺序，语音代理在真实噪声条件下表现显著下降（26-38%）。该项目通过社区贡献持续迭代优化，为AI代理能力评估提供了重要的基准测试工具。

raw_content:
Show HN: Τ³-Bench is out – can agents handle complex docs and live calls?

τ-Bench is an open benchmark for evaluating AI agents on grounded, multi-turn customer service tasks with verifiable outcomes. It&#x27;s been great to see the community adopt it since launch — this is now the third iteration. With τ³-Bench, we&#x27;re extending it to two new settings: knowledge-intensive retrieval and full-duplex voice.<p>τ-Knowledge: agents must navigate ~700 interconnected policy documents to complete multi-step tasks. Best frontier model (GPT-5.2, high reasoning) hits ~25%. The surprising part: even when you hand the model the exact documents it needs, performance only reaches ~40%. We found that the bottleneck isn&#x27;t retrieval — it&#x27;s reasoning over complex, interlinked policies and executing the right actions in the right order.<p>τ-Voice: same grounded tasks, but over live full-duplex voice with realistic audio — accents, background noise, interruptions, compressed phone lines. Voice agents score 31–51% in clean audio conditions and 26–38% in realistic ones. A consistent failure pattern across providers (OpenAI, Gemini, xAI): agent mishears a name or email during authentication, and everything downstream fails.<p>We also incorporated 75+ task fixes to the original airline, retail, and telecom domains — many based on community audits and PRs (including contributions from Amazon and Anthropic). We believe a benchmark is only as good as its maintenance, and we&#x27;re grateful for the community&#x27;s help improving it.<p>Code and leaderboard are open — we&#x27;d welcome community submissions and feedback.<p>Blog post (papers, code, leaderboard): <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sierra.ai&#x2F;blog&#x2F;bench-advancing-agent-benchmarking-to-knowledge-and-voice" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sierra.ai&#x2F;blog&#x2F;bench-advancing-agent-benchmarking-to...</a>


id: 093d346963a4
title: Show HN: Agent Skill Harbor – a GitHub-native skill platform for teams
source_url: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47530391
source_platform: hackernews
author: hatappo
published_at: 2026-03-26T13:43:03+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-27T01:03:15.136899+00:00
scenario_type: 商业流程自动化
tools_used: ["GitHub", "GitHub Actions", "GitHub Pages", "Git"]
novelty: new
similar_to_ids: []
summary:
Agent Skill Harbor是一个GitHub原生的开源技能管理平台，帮助团队和组织共享、追踪和治理AI代理技能，通过Git自然存储文本工件。该平台采用无数据库、无服务器架构，利用GitHub Actions和GitHub Pages自动发布静态目录，解决了组织层面的AI技能安全管理和协作问题。

raw_content:
Show HN: Agent Skill Harbor – a GitHub-native skill platform for teams

There are already many services for discovering public skills, and many ways to manage your own personal skills.<p>What still feels missing is the middle layer: how teams and organizations share AI agent skills, track provenance, and keep them safe to use.<p>Agent Skill Harbor is an OSS skill management platform for that layer. It is GitHub-native, DB-less, and serverless by design, because skills are mostly text artifacts that already fit naturally in Git.<p>It collects skills from GitHub repos, tracks provenance, supports governance and safety checks, and publishes a static catalog site with GitHub Actions and GitHub Pages.<p>Repo: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;skill-mill&#x2F;agent-skill-harbor" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;skill-mill&#x2F;agent-skill-harbor</a>
Demo: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;skill-mill.github.io&#x2F;agent-skill-harbor-demo&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;skill-mill.github.io&#x2F;agent-skill-harbor-demo&#x2F;</a>


id: b0f62502d655
title: Claude's New Tool Use: Game-Changer for AI Workflow Builders
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2025-11-25T00:00:00+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-27T01:03:50.758272+00:00
scenario_type: 工作流自动化
tools_used: ["Claude API", "Tool Use", "MCPs (Model Context Protocol)", "Code Execution Tools"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["c72959eb8ed0", "cc892671a906", "812ad789aa06", "0ed02b58229f", "286e6147c6ae", "4188cb874081"]
summary:
讨论Claude的高级工具使用功能，包括按需搜索工具、程序化工具调用和使用示例优化等能力，这些改进显著提高了AI智能体和LLM自动化工作流的效率和token利用率。该更新对构建复杂工作流的开发者特别有价值，尤其是在处理大规模数据和多服务集成场景中。

source_url:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1p61d2x/claudes_new_tool_use_gamechanger_for_ai_workflow/

raw_content:
Claude's New Tool Use: Game-Changer for AI Workflow Builders

Claude’s New Tool Use: Game-Changer for AI Workflow Builders : r/ClaudeCode Skip to main content Claude’s New Tool Use: Game-Changer for AI Workflow Builders : r/ClaudeCode

Go to ClaudeCode

r/ClaudeCode 4mo ago

SunBurnBun

# Claude’s New Tool Use: Game-Changer for AI Workflow Builders

Just checked out Anthropic's new blog on advanced tool use for Claude. It's honestly a big step forward for anyone building AI agents or interested in LLM-powered automation. Here are the highlights:

Claude can now search and discover tools on-demand instead of loading everything upfront. Saves a ton of context space and actually makes large tool libraries manageable.

There's programmatic tool calling—so instead of clunky, one-at-a-time requests, Claude can orchestrate full workflows in code. Way less token usage and way more efficient with large data.

Anthropic now lets you add concrete usage examples for your tools. No more guesswork—Claude learns best practices straight from your samples, not just JSON schemas.

Honestly, these additions solve a lot of pain points with complex agent workflows—especially if you're working with lots of services, huge data, or need reliable tool selection. Excited to see what devs will build with this!

https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/advanced-tool-use

Read more

Share

---

• Promoted

Math is Christopher's thing. As an actuary, he gets to use his math skills for good.

Collapse video player

---

Stock-Protection-453

4mo ago

Yet to be implemented on their products

3

CallMeYox

4mo ago

Is there a way to add it externally for existing MCPs?

1

SunBurnBun

4mo ago

Currently, I am testing a few things in this latest update. I'll post all the resources as soon as I am done.

3

Continue this thread

Relative_Mouse7680

4mo ago

Are these meant to be model capabilities or software improvements?

1

SunBurnBun

4mo ago

Actually both. You can save a lot of token for model (as they have demonstrated this with Opus 4.5) along with this, you can integrate the same workflow in your vibe coding setup.

2

Continue this thread

_zeleboba_

3mo ago

I do not understand why this is being discussed in the Claude Code subreddit - the described approach is based on sandboxed "Code Execution tools", which generally only properly work in controlled backend environments and which I do not see shipped as part of Claude Code any time soon.

1

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Your Privacy Choices Accessibility Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.

Expand Navigation Collapse Navigation


id: 31661aae5fd3
title: wshobson/agents
source_url: https://github.com/wshobson/agents
source_platform: github
author: wshobson
published_at: 2026-03-26T21:41:03+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-27T01:04:25.718077+00:00
scenario_type: 工作流自动化
tools_used: ["Claude Code", "Multi-agent Orchestration", "Claude Code CLI", "Claude Code Plugins"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["c72959eb8ed0", "cc892671a906", "220851dd1119", "4188cb874081"]
summary:
这是一个基于Claude Code的智能自动化和多智能体编排框架，通过子智能体、插件和工作流自动化实现复杂的任务协调。该项目提供了完整的agent编排能力，支持技能扩展和命令链执行，具有很强的实际应用价值。

raw_content:
wshobson/agents

Intelligent automation and multi-agent orchestration for Claude Code

Topics: agents, anthropic, anthropic-claude, automation, claude, claude-code, claude-code-cli, claude-code-commands, claude-code-plugin, claude-code-plugins, claude-code-skills, claude-code-subagents, claude-skills, claudecode, claudecode-config, claudecode-subagents, orchestration, sub-agents, subagents, workflows
Language: Python | Stars: 32329


id: 9295d036ae48
title: Is Claude Code actually making you more productive, or ... - Reddit
source_url: https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1rzvfat/is_claude_code_actually_making_you_more/
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2026-03-22T01:00:13.745000+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-28T01:08:43.209693+00:00
scenario_type: 代码生成与审查
tools_used: ["Claude Code", "AI-assisted development tools"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["a2015e583d5d", "7b412b155b1c", "1842541e1ac9", "4a5ecb108ac0", "14e44e9fc58c"]
summary:
这是一场关于Claude Code生产力影响的社区讨论，涉及开发者和研究人员对AI编程助手的实际价值的反思。核心观点包括：虽然编码速度显著提升（1.5-2倍），但也存在缺乏战略方向、倾向于快速原型而非深度价值创造的风险，关键建议是分离探索时间与执行时间，在构建前做好计划。

raw_content:
Is Claude Code actually making you more productive, or ... - Reddit

Is Claude Code actually making you more productive, or just more entertained? : r/ClaudeAI Skip to main content Is Claude Code actually making you more productive, or just more entertained? : r/ClaudeAI

Go to ClaudeAI

r/ClaudeAI 3d ago

Pjoubert

# Is Claude Code actually making you more productive, or just more entertained?

Genuine question. I ship faster, I enjoy it more, but looking back at the last few months, I’m not convinced I’m delivering more value than before.

The dopamine of “it works!” is real. The discipline of “should I build this at all?” has quietly disappeared.

Anyone else feeling this?

Read more

Share

---

• Promoted

Take the shortest path from thought to finished thing. Bring your ideas to life with Figma AI.

---



ClaudeAI-mod-bot

3d ago

TL;DR of the discussion generated automatically after 50 comments.

Looks like this thread hit a nerve. The consensus is split, but leans towards Claude being a massive productivity booster, if you know how to use it.

The "hell yes" camp is reporting huge gains. The top comment is from a researcher who published 2 years' worth of papers in 6 months. Others are non-devs building $50k+ worth of custom software for their businesses that would've never existed otherwise. For pro devs, the feeling is a solid 1.5-2x speed boost, making coding fun again by automating boring plumbing and finally tackling years of technical debt.

However, many of you agree with OP's core fear: we're just building the same shitty 2018-era apps, but faster. The dopamine hit of "it works!" is real, but it's leading to a "graveyard" of half-baked agent orchestration projects that solve problems nobody has. Some are also frustrated by the constant tinkering, workflow instability, and the "slot machine" feel of the models, arguing any productivity gains are lost to churn.

The big brain takeaway from the thread is that speed is useless without direction. The pro-tip is to:

Separate your "exploration time" (tinkering) from your "execution time" (building).

Plan features on paper first. The friction is intentional and forces you to ask the most important question AI can't answer yet: "Should I build this at all?"

1



Peglegpilates

3d ago

Bruh I have 4 papers in round 2 review, 2 in round 1 all in six months.

It would have taken me 2 years to push that much research out as first author.

Most of it (simulations, and statistical analysis, positioning ) has been sped up Claude code and the other guys.

72



lev400

3d ago

Nice work !

9



Peglegpilates

3d ago

Thank you. It’s helped me immensely in areas I am weak at.

6

Continue this thread



Chrisgpresents

3d ago

Can I ask how you use it or a general framework? Curious for medical paper applications

6



ZestyDoughnut

3d ago

What field are you in? Would love to hear more about how you utilize it as someone who is looking for researchers/authors to help create.

4

3 more replies

Continue this thread



junesix

3d ago

It’s ok. We’re all in this high speed explore and learn phase. Burnout will set in and it’s time to focus on the real work.

Everyone shipping the same agent orchestration will realize there are thousands of them on github and hundreds more every week and no one is using theirs except themselves.

25



Pjoubert

3d ago

The orchestration graveyard is real. The ones that survive aren’t the cleverest pipelines, they’re the ones that solved a decision problem someone actually had. Most builders skip that part

6

3 more replies

Continue this thread 3 more replies

Continue this thread

• Promoted

Everything for work. In one place.



ExogamousUnfolding

3d ago

It's making me enjoy development again instead of spending large amounts of time on plumbing I can focus on the creation process which is what I enjoy.

21



lightFracture

3d ago

This. Coding was just a way of implementing a solution to a problem. For a lot of us the joy comes from solving the problem not implementing the solution.

4



ExogamousUnfolding

3d ago

Yep and I didn’t really realize that about myself until I was staying up all night building things with Claude

3

1 more reply

Continue this thread 1 more reply

Continue this thread



TeamBunty

3d ago

It's true, the vast majority of people using AI to write apps aren't delivering more value.

It's because everyone's writing the same shitty apps they always have, just faster. It's 2026 and yall are using AI to write 2018-era apps.

36



Plenty_Line2696

3d ago

not faster in my case, but better and cooler because things don't take as long anymore. absolutely loving it.

you know all those times people in the past would moan that certain things desperately need refactoring but you wouldn't get to it because it eats up time and so you're forced to work with it? well now i can do more of that refactoring. just to name one example, but everything i work on had bits from llm's which helped.

7

7 more replies

Continue this thread



lbjazz

3d ago

As someone who is not a professional developer, I’m producing real software for my business that otherwise would not exist. It’s delivering massive value to me. I asked Claude to estimate how much it would cost me to hire out what I had it do when I had extra time to spare with it across about a month. It estimated $50k on the low end. And I’ve now done about that much again since while also learning a lot of new skills with Claude that are paying off in other domains.

11



turbospeedsc

3d ago

Same here, made software for my business that didn't exist and has saved us and our clients lots of time and money.

4



D7240

2d ago

I’m literally doing that while reading reddit. It’s been fun and helped clarify some business questions i have had. Claude has been excellent for me

4

Continue this thread Continue this thread

• Promoted

No code. Just your idea. We build it.



ProfessionalEbb339

3d ago

Productivity is high. It feels like almost a drug. I can do too much with claude. I

7



jbourdea

3d ago

The fact that you failed to finish this sentence is hilariously ironic.. and unfortunately relatable

11



FloridaWhoaman

3d ago

snort laughs take my upvote

3

2 more replies

Continue this thread Continue this thread



Final-Counter1601

3d ago

I think you are mostly right, i have trained it to do a few things that make it quicker than me, but mostly just a new cool tool.

6



ExpletiveDeIeted

3d ago

Going by story points I’m 1.5 to 2x faster. It has also allowed me to undertake refactors that I have put off for years. I still work carefully, little is fully autonomous, though I have pretty effectively turned the shitty cycle of audit issues, jira tickets, dependency upgrades and PRs into an automated process that cuts down on tedious boring work.

4

2 more replies

Continue this thread



xkcd327

3d ago

I had the same realization a few months in. The speed is real, but direction matters more than velocity. What helped me was separating exploration time from execution time. I give myself permission to tinker, but when I am in execution mode, I plan features on paper first. The friction is intentional.

3

2 more replies

Continue this thread



DifferenceTimely8292

3d ago

It’s making me more productive but also lazy at the same time… If I have to repeat anything more than 3 times, I used to think about automation (but didn’t get time ) now I spin up a session and ask Claude to automate

3



catgirl-lover-69

3d ago

I get more goon hours in so yeah it’s a plus

3



Ok_Potential359

3d ago

Lol I used Claude to get my current job offer. Wrote my entire presentation and what I was going to say for my roleplay. Claude is my personal MVP.

3

---

## View Post in

Português (Brasil)

Русский

简体中文

Tiếng Việt

繁體中文

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Your Privacy Choices Accessibility Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.

Expand Navigation Collapse Navigation


id: fe0b1d921565
title: Anyone else using Claude to build automation workflows? - Reddit
source_url: https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1rkkozb/anyone_else_using_claude_to_build_automation/
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2026-03-05T00:00:00+00:00
collected_at: 2026-03-28T01:08:53.946385+00:00
scenario_type: 工作流自动化
tools_used: ["Claude API", "Latenode MCP", "Make.com", "n8n"]
novelty: similar
summary:
用户讨论如何使用Claude构建多步骤自动化工作流，特别是通过Latenode MCP等工具将Claude与外部业务系统集成，实现跨应用的端到端流程自动化。这反映了AI代理在实际业务自动化中的应用趋势，强调了数据连接和系统集成的重要性。

similar_to_ids:
["31661aae5fd3", "b0f62502d655", "cc892671a906", "812ad789aa06", "5a241dca4394", "de2ce3f50104", "0ed02b58229f", "286e6147c6ae", "4831c43f9ed8"]

raw_content:
Anyone else using Claude to build automation workflows? - Reddit

Anyone else using Claude to build automation workflows? : r/ClaudeAI Skip to main content Anyone else using Claude to build automation workflows? : r/ClaudeAI

Go to ClaudeAI

r/ClaudeAI 12d ago

flatacthe

# Anyone else using Claude to build automation workflows?

I’ve been experimenting with Claude for more complex tasks lately, and I’m curious how many of you are actually using it to orchestrate multi-step workflows — not just writing code, but building agent-style automations that handle end-to-end processes.

The reason I’m asking is because I kept hitting the same wall: Claude is excellent at reasoning through workflow logic, but actually executing that logic across different apps usually means stitching together a bunch of separate tools.

Recently, I started connecting my agents to external tools via Latenode MCP, which basically lets Claude access real business apps as callable tools inside workflows. Instead of just planning what should happen, the agent can actually trigger actions across systems — update records, send messages, move data between apps — without me manually wiring everything together each time.

I’ve also been testing a few low-code platforms that let you drop Claude into a visual builder alongside integrations, and it’s honestly changed how I think about what’s possible without hiring a dev team.

What I’m realizing is that the future of AI automation isn’t just Claude being smart — it’s Claude being smart and connected to your actual business systems. The data foundation piece matters too, which honestly most of us are still figuring out.

Are you guys building anything like this? What does your workflow look like when Claude needs to actually do something beyond generating text?

Read more

Share

---

• Promoted

Cut Code Review Time and Bugs in Half. Sign up for a free trial!

---

alex303

12d ago

Mind sharing what the low-code platforms that let you drag and drop Claude into a visual builder are? I’be been wanting something like this.

1

Ploasd

12d ago

I assume something like n8n

1

flatacthe

11d ago

i haven't found a drag and drop thing that really works smoothly yet. most of what ive done is either custom code with the api or using make.com. which has some ai integration but it's pretty clunky compared to just calling claude directly. latenode mcp is more like a connector protocol so claude can call external tools rather than a visual builder thing. are you looking for something where you can literally see the workflow visually or would you be okay with some configuration files if the integration was cleaner?

1

Continue this thread

---

## View Post in

Français

Português (Brasil)

日本語

Tiếng Việt

हिन्दी

简体中文

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Your Privacy Choices Accessibility Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.

Expand Navigation Collapse Navigation


id: d344aad0f299
title: Testing OpenClaw: a self-hosted AI agent that automates real tasks ...
source_url: https://www.reddit.com/r/Rag/comments/1rlydlg/testing_openclaw_a_selfhosted_ai_agent_that/
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2026-03-06T00:00:00+00:00
collected_at: 2026-04-01T01:00:37.878817+00:00
scenario_type: 工作流自动化
tools_used: ["OpenClaw", "本地AI模型", "云API", "邮箱自动化", "PDF提取", "文件系统管理", "代码仓库监控"]
novelty: similar
summary:
OpenClaw是一个自托管的本地AI自动化系统，能够跨系统执行真实任务，包括邮件自动分类、PDF研究总结、文件管理和开发工作流自动化。该工具提供了比云端解决方案更好的数据隐私控制，支持模型无关架构，使用户能够建立定制化的自动化工作流。

similar_to_ids:
["a136b5ba4f7c", "5a241dca4394", "0ed02b58229f", "de2ce3f50104", "812ad789aa06", "707aa3dba594", "a4713fb9eb43"]

raw_content:
Testing OpenClaw: a self-hosted AI agent that automates real tasks ...

Testing OpenClaw: a self-hosted AI agent that automates real tasks on my laptop : r/Rag Skip to main content Testing OpenClaw: a self-hosted AI agent that automates real tasks on my laptop : r/Rag 

 

 

 

Go to Rag 

r/Rag 21d ago 

devasheesh_07 

 

# Testing OpenClaw: a self-hosted AI agent that automates real tasks on my laptop

I recently started experimenting with OpenClaw, which is a self-hosted AI automation system that runs locally instead of relying completely on cloud AI tools. The concept is pretty interesting because it’s not just a chatbot , it can actually execute tasks across your system.

From what I’ve seen so far, the idea is that you can give it instructions and it connects different parts of your environment together things like your inbox, browser, file system, and other services and turns that into one conversational interface. So instead of only asking questions, you can tell it to do things.

One example that caught my attention was email automation. Some setups scan your inbox overnight, categorize messages (urgent, follow-up, informational), and even draft responses so you only focus on the messages that actually need attention.

Another use case I saw was research workflows. People upload PDFs or papers and the system extracts key ideas and structured summaries automatically. That could be pretty useful for anyone doing research, consulting, or analysis work.

There are also smaller but practical automations like organizing messy downloads folders, running scheduled backups, or monitoring repositories and summarizing pull requests. It feels more like an automation engine than a typical AI assistant.

One interesting thing is that it’s model-agnostic, so you can connect different AI models depending on your setup. Some people run it with local models, while others connect cloud APIs. Because it runs locally, it also gives more control over data and privacy compared to fully cloud-based assistants.

I’m still exploring what’s possible with it, but it seems like people are building some creative workflows around it things like meeting transcription pipelines, developer automation, and even smart home triggers.

Curious if anyone here has experimented with this type of local AI automation setup. What kind of workflows are you using it for?

If people are interested, I can also share a more detailed breakdown of what I’ve found so far. https://www.loghunts.com/openclaw-local-ai-automation And if anything I mentioned here sounds inaccurate, feel free to point it out still learning how this ecosystem works.

Read more

Share 

---

• Promoted

Choose the browser engineered for speed. Get Chrome for your computer.

 

Collapse video player

---

 

 

CharlesWiltgen 

21d ago

This is month-old (at least) news, but for anyone just hearing about Clawdbot/Moltbot/OpenClaw: Do not run OpenClaw on a machine you use for anything important, and do not give the machine it's running on access to your local network. It's estimated that ⅓ or more OpenClaw skills/agents have gaping security holes and/or are active malware. https://www.xda-developers.com/please-stop-using-openclaw/

 

 4

 

 

Otherwise_Wave9374 

21d ago

This is exactly the kind of agentic setup I think a lot of people will end up running locally, especially for inbox and file system workflows. How are you thinking about permissions and safety (like an allowlist of actions, confirmations for destructive steps, etc.)? I have been jotting down some patterns for building and evaluating AI agents (local + hosted) here if useful: https://www.agentixlabs.com/blog/

 

 2

 

 

bluejones37 

21d ago

Def learned something from that, I haven't played with it or did in myself yet... Tx

 

 1

 

 

New_Animator_7710 

21d ago

Your example about inbox automation is actually one of the most studied use cases for AI assistants. Email overload has long been recognized as a productivity bottleneck, and researchers have experimented with AI systems that classify messages by urgency or required action. If OpenClaw can reliably categorize and draft replies locally, that could significantly reduce cognitive load. The key question is how well it handles nuance, since misclassification in professional communication can have real consequences.

 

 1

 

 

Sea-Technician-9972 

2h ago

self-hosting is definitely the move for privacy but the setup is a total headache. i ended up using bluestacks.ai because it gives u that local control and privacy without needing a degree in devops to get it working. it runs a secure vm on ur own machine so u keep all ur data but skip the messy configuration.

 

 1

 

---

## View Post in

हिन्दी

Português (Brasil)

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Accessibility Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.

Expand Navigation Collapse Navigation

 

 

Let us know your cookie preferences

Reddit uses cookies and similar technologies to:

- Keep the website operational and running properly
- Prevent fraud and abuse
- Monitor site usage and performance metrics

If you choose “Accept All” we’ll also use cookies to:

- Personalize your recommendations and ads
- Measure the performance of ads
- Develop and improve new features and services

If you choose “Reject Optional Cookies” we won’t use cookies for these additional uses. You can update your cookie preference from your settings.

Learn more about how Reddit uses cookies.

Accept All Reject Optional Cookies


id: 05ecd0f80d8a
title: Anyone here actually using OpenClaw in real workflows? - Reddit
source_url: https://www.reddit.com/r/AI_Agents/comments/1s4hubf/anyone_here_actually_using_openclaw_in_real/
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2026-03-27T01:00:09.145000+00:00
collected_at: 2026-04-01T01:01:00.540805+00:00
scenario_type: 工作流自动化
tools_used: ["OpenClaw", "KiloClaw", "Claude"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["a136b5ba4f7c", "707aa3dba594", "0ed02b58229f", "4a8b3582430c", "d3c626ef2158"]
summary:
用户讨论OpenClaw在实际工作流中的应用，主要用于内容创作、文档编写和研究工作。OpenClaw被定位为具有持久上下文和独立工作能力的AI助手，相比直接使用Claude能够处理更复杂的多步骤任务和跨文档的信息综合。

raw_content:
Anyone here actually using OpenClaw in real workflows? - Reddit

Anyone here actually using OpenClaw in real workflows? : r/AI_Agents Skip to main content Anyone here actually using OpenClaw in real workflows? : r/AI_Agents 

 

 

 

Go to AI_Agents 

r/AI_Agents 23h ago 

RepairOld9423 

 

# Anyone here actually using OpenClaw in real workflows?

I’ve been noticing OpenClaw come up a lot lately, but I’m trying to separate hype from actual usage.

For people who’ve tried it:

Are you using it regularly for anything?

What kind of workflows have you set up?

Does it genuinely save time or just add more setup overhead?

I’ve been testing it a bit, feels powerful, but also easy to overengineer.

Curious what real use cases look like.

Read more

Share 

---

• Promoted

Discover how 919 global leaders are prioritizing resilience, reliability & observability in the Dynatrace report.

 

---

 

 

Ok_Chef_5858 

9h ago

yeah using OpenClaw via KiloClaw daily, mostly for content workflows.

 

 8

 

 

chton 

22h ago

I use mine daily, all the time. But 'workflows' is not how you should be thinking about it. I don't have any specific workflows.Imagine you had a very capable, but very junior, human personal assistant. Would you 'set up workflows' with them? No, you'd just tell them what you want them to do. Or tell them what you want to do together with them, in the moment, and they'll take care of their part.That's how i use mine. If you give it a good model it's smart enough to know what it needs to fulfil pretty much any task you throw at it, and so i use it for everything all the time. Need to write a long document? talk to it about what you need to write and what you want in it, then review together with it, etc.Need to figure something out? talk to it about what you need to know and let it do the research and then look at it together until you get it.Need it to do something consistently, like every few hours? talk to it about what you need it to do and it'll go and set it up for you.

You can definitely overengineer, but if you let it do the engineering and you just treat it like you would an assistant, you'd get a lot more out of it.

 

 5

 

Felwyin 

15h ago

I think you can do all the usages you describe with Claude. I haven't tried the scheduled task yet, but other things you describe can be done just with the chat.

 

 3

 

chton 

3h ago

You can, but it can't do independent work completely with a persistent context the same way.I could ask claude to research something and it'll do it and give me a research report.but what it can't do is research something, cross reference that with information about things we've spoken about before, cross compare with some documents we wrote, and then give me a research report that highlights how the new research applies to my situation. Not without me telling it all of that, and its own memory system isn't good enough for that. And while it also can't do all of that while i keep talking to it about something else, without me having to swap between conversations.

OpenClaw isn't some magical new capability, it's just a way those capabilities are composed that enable them to be used easier, more naturally, and more impactfully. I find it works wonders for me, but others might not.

 

 1

Continue this thread Continue this thread 

 

DataGOGO 

19h ago

I would never use it with real data or connected to the internet

 

 3

 

 

Weaves87 

19h ago

I use Pi which OpenClaw is built on top of. Pi only gives the LLM a handful of tools (read/write/edit/bash) and is much more minimalistic.

Works great for my agentic dev workflow. I like it better than Claude Code, it's got a fraction of the token usage and is overall a much cleaner experience

 

 2

 

 

TireFryer426 

19h ago

I’m not using it in a production environment for workflows because I don’t really think that’s what it’s meant for. I do use Claude and n8n for workflows. I have openclaw set up on openrouter. I’m using it as more of a researcher - high level thinker. The main chat bot I interact with runs opus, and it spawns tasks on sonnet (cheaper). So I’ll feed my openclaw agent broad ideas or a complex project I’m working on - I’m having it go out and do the research, write me a plan, and then you can follow up with gotchas or ask if there are things you haven’t considered. It can get a little spendy. Depending on how complicated the question is you could be looking at $.50 to $5. But the stuff I’m asking would normally take me hours….But building tools and workflows - all Claude code max and n8n

But to address your question directly. Yes, I use it and it definitely saves time. I’d like to be able to use it more on local LLM’s, but I’m not there yet.

 

 2

 

 

Efficient_Pace 

15h ago

How much does it add in API costs? I mean am just reading about it and worried if it will just blow up context uncontrollably and cost a bomb

 

 2

 

 

MCPWorks_Simon 

12h ago

I'm biased because I'm building my own agentic package, but I've tried it and was impressed but also deeply concerned. My biggest issue is that it's an agent of chaos just by nature of it's design.

I trusted it with it's own sandbox and it's own accounts, but it terrifies me how easy it is for beginners to just install with a command. It can do too much and it's too cavalier about it. I feel a little polemic when I say it's an irresponsible software package, but yeah I believe that.

I don't know how you'd make it production ready and reproducible. I don't know how you wrangle it without neutering it. I don't know how it could possibly scale. What I do know about it is for likely thousands of hobbyists and tinkerers, they're one bad prompt injection away from being very uncomfortably compromised.

Cool demo though.

 

 2

 

 

m0m0karun 

16h ago

OpenWork is where it's at now.

 

 1

 

 

duridsukar 

21h ago

Yes, using it daily. Real estate operation -- transaction coordination, contingency deadline monitoring, market data pulls.

The overengineering feeling is real. I started by building a complex multi-agent system that would handle everything. Month two I had a near-miss: an agent almost let a contingency deadline slip because the architecture was too clever. After that I simplified everything.

The thing that actually runs every day is embarrassingly simple. One agent watches open transactions. Checks dates. Sends me a flag if something needs attention in the next 48 hours. That is it. I have not missed a deadline since.

The flashy stuff I built first? Mostly turned off. The boring watcher I almost did not bother with? Load-bearing.

What is the first workflow you are trying to solve for?

 

 0

 

gcaussade 

18h ago

Yes, this is the problem with the current state of LLM technology. Claude Opus 4.6 is next level. But generating agents is tricky

 

 1

 

TampakBelakang 

6h ago

Do use specific skills for that?

 

 1

Continue this thread 

 

AutoModerator 

23h ago

Thank you for your submission, for any questions regarding AI, please check out our wiki at https://www.reddit.com/r/ai_agents/wiki(this is currently in test and we are actively adding to the wiki)

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

 

 1

 

 

yixn_io 

3h ago

Been running OpenClaw daily for about 4 months now. The workflows that actually stuck for me:

Cron jobs that scan Reddit, check email inboxes, and monitor Google Search Console data on a schedule. The agent writes summaries and sends them to Telegram. Took maybe 20 minutes to set up each one. I have a content pipeline where it researches topics, drafts blog posts in markdown, and I just review and publish. That one saves me 3-4 hours per week on two different sites.

The overengineering trap is real though. Early on I tried building these massive multi-agent orchestrations and spent more time debugging than actually getting value. What works is keeping each agent focused on one thing. One agent handles my Telegram conversations. Another runs isolated cron tasks. They share a workspace folder for context but otherwise stay in their lane.

The persistent memory system (MEMORY.md, daily note files) is what makes it click. Your agent wakes up each session, reads what happened yesterday, and picks up where it left off. Without that, you're just talking to a blank slate every time.

I built ClawHosters partly because the setup overhead was the #1 complaint I kept hearing. If you want to skip the Docker/VPS config and just start building workflows, that removes the friction. But honestly even self-hosted, once you get past initial setup, the daily usage is pretty low-maintenance.

 

 1

 

---

## View Post in

Português (Brasil)

हिन्दी

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Your Privacy Choices Accessibility Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.

Expand Navigation Collapse Navigation


id: 84df05c8f6b2
title: Show HN: Postgres extension for BM25 relevance-ranked full-text search
source_url: https://github.com/timescale/pg_textsearch
source_platform: hackernews
author: tjgreen
published_at: 2026-03-31T16:29:52+00:00
collected_at: 2026-04-01T01:01:34.245600+00:00
scenario_type: 代码生成与审查
tools_used: ["Claude Code", "Claude Opus", "Postgres", "pgvectorscale", "Tantivy"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["18828760520c", "944ee2786f08", "1842541e1ac9", "4a5ecb108ac0", "c308aabe6a31"]
summary:
一个开发者利用Claude Code和Claude Opus等AI工具，在两个季度内单独完成了一个原本预计需要6-12个月的Postgres BM25全文搜索扩展项目。该项目展示了AI辅助开发如何显著加速复杂数据库系统的开发周期，最终成果性能超过了业界成熟方案ParadeDB/Tantivy 4.7倍。

raw_content:
Show HN: Postgres extension for BM25 relevance-ranked full-text search

Last summer we faced a conundrum at my company, Tiger Data, a Postgres cloud vendor whose main business is in timeseries data.  We were trying to grow our business towards emerging AI-centric workloads and wanted to provide a state-of-the-art hybrid search stack in Postgres.  We&#x27;d already built pgvectorscale in house with the goal of scaling semantic search beyond pgvector&#x27;s main memory limitations.  We just needed a scalable ranked keyword search solution too.<p>The problem: core Postgres doesn&#x27;t provide this; the leading Postgres BM25 extension, ParadeDB, is guarded behind AGPL; developing our own extension appeared daunting.  We&#x27;d need a small team of sharp engineers and 6-12 months, I figured.  And we&#x27;d probably still fall short of the performance of a mature system like Parade&#x2F;Tantivy.<p>Or would we?  I&#x27;d be experimenting long enough with AI-boosted development at that point to realize that with the latest tools (Claude Code + Opus) and an experienced hand (I&#x27;ve been working in database systems internals for 25 years now), the old time estimates pretty much go out the window.<p>I told our CTO I thought I could solo the project in one quarter.  This raised some eyebrows.<p>It did take a little more time than that (two quarters), and we got some real help from the community (amazing!) after open-sourcing the pre-release.  But I&#x27;m thrilled&#x2F;exhausted today to share that pg_textsearch v1.0 is freely available via open source (Postgres license), on Tiger Data cloud, and hopefully soon, a hyperscalar near you:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;timescale&#x2F;pg_textsearch" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;timescale&#x2F;pg_textsearch</a><p>In the blog post accompanying the release, I overview the architecture and present benchmark results using MS-MARCO.  To my surprise, we were not only able to meet Parade&#x2F;Tantivy&#x27;s query performance, but exceed it substantially, measuring a 4.7x advantage on query throughput at scale:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.tigerdata.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;pg-textsearch-bm25-full-text-search-postgres" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.tigerdata.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;pg-textsearch-bm25-full-text-...</a><p>It&#x27;s exciting (and, to be honest, a little unnerving) to see a field I&#x27;ve spent so much time toiling in change so quickly in ways that enable us to be more ambitious in our technical objectives.  Technical moats are moats no longer.<p>The benchmark scripts and methodology are available in the github repo.  Happy to answer any questions in the thread.<p>Thanks,<p>TJ (tj@tigerdata.com)


id: 8eba46fc136a
title: Show HN: I turned a sketch into a 3D-print pegboard for my kid with an AI agent
source_url: https://github.com/virpo/pegboard
source_platform: hackernews
author: virpo
published_at: 2026-03-30T23:20:02+00:00
collected_at: 2026-04-01T01:01:57.239351+00:00
scenario_type: 代码生成与审查
tools_used: ["Codex", "Fusion 360", "3D printer"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["944ee2786f08", "c853cd98108e", "479b12fd3591", "18828760520c", "1842541e1ac9"]
summary:
用户通过拍摄手绘草图，借助Codex AI生成3D打印代码，仅需5分钟即完成了传统上需要1-2小时的Fusion 360建模工作。该工作流展示了AI在将创意快速转化为可执行代码的实际应用，大幅提升了设计到制造的效率。

raw_content:
Show HN: I turned a sketch into a 3D-print pegboard for my kid with an AI agent

We have pegboards and plywood all over our apartment, and I had an idea to make a tiny pegboard for my kid, Oli. So I naturally cut the wood, drilled in the holes, sat down at the computer to open Fusion 360 and spend an hour or two drawing the pieces by hand.<p>Then I looked at the rough sketch Oli and I had made together, took a photo of it, pasted it into Codex, and gave it just two dimensions: the holes are 40mm apart and the pegs are 8mm wide.<p>To my surprise, 5 minutes later my 3D printer was heating up and printing the first set.<p>I ran it a few times to tune the dimensions for ideal fit, but I am posting the final result as a repository in case anyone else wants to print one, tweak it, or have fun with it too. I am already printing another one to hang on our front door instead of a wreath, so people visiting us have something fun and intriguing to play with while they knock.<p>This is also going onto my list of weird uses of AI from the last few months.


id: 38804a3d0fbc
title: I spent a week testing OpenClaw. Cool demo, but I don't think ...
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2026-02-08T00:00:00+00:00
collected_at: 2026-04-01T01:02:10.100498+00:00
scenario_type: 其他
tools_used: ["OpenClaw", "Airtable", "Notion", "Gmail", "WhatsApp"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["7e916297581a", "ee22d34cfd86"]
summary:
作者分享了对OpenClaw通用AI代理一周的测试体验,认为虽然功能全面但存在配置复杂、维护成本高等问题,实际工作中反而增加了管理负担。作者主张在实际运维中应优先采用更可靠的专用工具和简单自动化方案,而非通用智能代理框架。

source_url:
https://www.reddit.com/r/AI_Agents/comments/1qz9rip/i_spent_a_week_testing_openclaw_cool_demo_but_i/

raw_content:
I spent a week testing OpenClaw. Cool demo, but I don't think ...

I spent a week testing OpenClaw. Cool demo, but I don’t think generalist AI agents are the right move for real ops. : r/AI_Agents Skip to main content I spent a week testing OpenClaw. Cool demo, but I don’t think generalist AI agents are the right move for real ops. : r/AI_Agents 

 

 

 

Go to AI_Agents 

r/AI_Agents 2mo ago 

Powerful_Driver8423 

 

# I spent a week testing OpenClaw. Cool demo, but I don’t think generalist AI agents are the right move for real ops.

OpenClaw is the new hot thing in AI agents right now. It’s open-source, it’s self-hosted, and it’s being sold as this personal assistant that plugs into your apps and just… does stuff for you. The “AI butler on your computer” pitch.

The GitHub stars shot past 100k stupid fast, which is basically catnip for people like me. So yeah. I installed it.

A week later, I’m sitting here kind of shrugging.

It’s not like it’s garbage. That’s not what I mean.

You can tell a lot of smart work went into it. The wiring, the breadth of it, the ambition… it’s real. But I make automations for a living, so my brain keeps doing this annoying little audit in the background: okay, did this actually take something off my plate? Did I actually close the laptop feeling like things were… handled? Like I had fewer little dangling threads. Fewer tabs I was scared to touch. Fewer “I’ll circle back” notes sitting in my head like unpaid parking tickets.

Most of the time it was the reverse. I didn’t end up with less work. I ended up with a new thing to manage.

I had more stuff to babysit. And that’s… kind of the whole point.

On paper, OpenClaw is a monster. Browse the web, write code, manage files, talk on WhatsApp, wire into a bunch of tools. The list is huge. In real life, I kept hitting the same wall: setup friction, configuration overhead, and that familiar feeling of being stuck in “framework-land.” Like I’m not doing the task, I’m setting up the thing that might maybe do the task if I massage it enough.

It’s flexible, sure. But it’s also fiddly. And it always feels like you’re one tweak away from either “wow this is magic” or “cool, now it’s broken in a new way.”

The bigger issue for me is there’s no obvious path through it. No “just do this, then that, and you’ll get a working result.” And founders do not want a framework. They want a button that works. They want something that’s boring in the best way. A general agent can easily turn into a do-nothing-well system unless you genuinely enjoy debugging agents as a hobby.

Meanwhile, the stuff that actually works in ops is way less glamorous.

- RAG on internal docs when you need answers that are actually grounded.

- Simple bots for messaging workflows.

- Direct API automations with Airtable, Notion, Gmail.

- Dedicated tools for content, research, coding.

It’s not sexy. It’s not a “one agent to rule them all” story. But it’s reliable, and reliability is the whole game when you’re running a small team.

I will give OpenClaw real credit for one thing though: the WhatsApp pairing.

That part was shockingly smooth. Scan a QR code, and suddenly your AI is basically a WhatsApp contact. Messages in, messages out. No Business API obstacle course. No week-long detour. I had it working in minutes, and I genuinely went, okay… that’s slick.

And yeah, kind of ironically, that made the rest of the experience feel worse.

Because once you get a taste of “click, done” actually being real, you start expecting the whole system to feel like that. And it doesn’t. You keep waiting for the next wow moment, and instead you’re back to wiring things up, tweaking settings, and trying to figure out why something that sounds simple is suddenly a mini project.

So if you’re a founder or you’re on a small team, here’s my take: OpenClaw is interesting. It’s worth poking at. It’s worth learning from. But I wouldn’t build core ops around a mega-agent yet. The complexity tax is real, and the risk tradeoff just isn’t great when you’re trying to keep the business moving.

I’m still bullish on AI in ops. Very bullish.

Just not in the form of one giant uber-agent that’s supposed to do everything.

The real wins I’m seeing are the unglamorous ones: a script that actually runs, a bot that does one narrow job, a workflow that connects A to B without drama. That’s what keeps small teams sane.

Read more

Share 

---

 

 

Technical_Scallion_2 

2mo ago

You’re exactly right - if you’re already a good coder and can automate things yourself. But for those of us who are technically proficient enough to follow instructions but aren’t coders, OpenClaw has huge value for business work that wasn’t available before.

Using my specific setup as an example, I have WhatsApp set up, and the Chrome browser extension that allows my agent to open websites and also drill down. It also has read-only access to my Outlook, and then its own email account too.

There’s an online repository of municipal bond documents at Emma.msrb.org. It has all the bond documents and reports for every municipal bond in the country including ongoing quarterly and annual reports.

I whatsapped my agent on the way to work and said “look in my sent mail from yesterday and find the quarterly report I emailed. Then go on Emma and find examples of quarterly reports for similar issues, analyze them, and summarize how I can improve my reports”. It did this in 3 minutes and emailed me the analysis, which had some great and useful ideas, and it quoted and saved the reports it looked at.

I then told it (at work) to go on Emma and pull the prospectuses (called OSes) for a client, look at the last three offerings, and see what each says about adding a new member to the obligated group. It fetched them, read them, summarized the findings, and emailed them to me - I double-checked what it found and it was 100% right.

I’m going through this detail because lots of people are saying “yeah these fanboys don’t give specifics” so I’m giving specifics of what OpenClaw can do that I couldn’t do, and that web UI Claude can’t do, and this was like one hour in one workday. It is a huge step up in my productivity in doing boring just-plain-work tasks.

Paying $50/day is not a factor for the assistance it’s providing.

I feel like I have to say this after every post now, but the above was 100% me, 0% AI.

 

 8

 

regression_to_mean 

2mo ago

This was a very good use case example.

 

 3

 1 more reply 

Continue this thread

 

Powerful_Driver8423 

2mo ago

Yeah, the outcome is solid. No argument there.

What I’m pushing back on is the path to get it. OpenClaw can do it, sure. But you don’t actually need a high-privilege, do-everything agent sitting in the middle just to land that result. Most of the time you can get the same win with smaller, more targeted automations, and you pay a lot less in risk, maintenance, and “future you will hate this” complexity.

The “non-coder friendly” vibe is kind of a mirage. Like, it looks approachable. You skim the docs, you see the quickstart, you think, “Oh cool, I can probably get this running in an afternoon.” And you can, technically. But running it and running it well are two different things.

Getting it set up correctly, then not accidentally giving it way more access than it needs, then keeping that whole setup sane over time… that’s not plug-and-play. It’s more like: you made the first step easier, and then all the real difficulty shows up two steps later.

So yeah: powerful tool, fun to explore, great for tinkering. I just wouldn’t make it my default choice for anything mission-critical in ops.

 

 2

 3 more replies 

Continue this thread

 

No_Cap8081 

2mo ago

Well, openclaw requires a TON of technical tinkering and technical knowledge to setup and make it do what you want

 

 2

 2 more replies 

Continue this thread Continue this thread 

 

forevergeeks 

2mo ago

Working in the IT field for more than 20 years, that's how my mind works too.

Questions, what is the value of this, does it make my life or others easier? Those are some of the questions i evaluate things with.

With AI, is really hard to find use cases that you really feel that is not just another thing you have to manage.

There are many hurdles that AI needs to smooth out still, and the big one is "trust, do you truly trust to give an an AI agent the keys to your kingdom? 🤔

 

 2

 

 

11hybrid 

2mo ago

you nailed it

 

 2

 

 

noselfinterest 

2mo ago

> It’s not sexy.

indeed, it is not.

and openclaw is sexy. even you got catnipped.

so, yeah. agree with u, its slop. but its sexy and hyped and teh guy who made it is probably going to get a lot of opportunity.

 

 2

 

 

mohdgame 

2mo ago

Specialized agents with human in the loop is the only way for production code

 

 2

 

 

synn89 

2mo ago

Aka, "You've got to start with the customer experience and work backwards to the technology".

 

 1

 

 

owenscales 

1mo ago

This is exactly why vertical AI agents are winning over horizontal ones. OpenClaw is great for general-purpose stuff — I actually run it on a Mac mini and it handles a lot. But when it comes to specific domains like marketing, general agents struggle because they don't understand platform-specific constraints.

We ran into this building hyperfx.ai — AI agents specifically for marketing teams. Things like Meta's ad policies, Google's quality score system, attribution windows, ROAS optimization... a general agent can't navigate that stuff reliably. You need domain-specific training and guardrails.

The sweet spot right now seems to be: use something like OpenClaw for personal automation, but purpose-built vertical agents for professional workflows.

 

 0

 

 

AutoModerator 

2mo ago

Thank you for your submission, for any questions regarding AI, please check out our wiki at https://www.reddit.com/r/ai_agents/wiki(this is currently in test and we are actively adding to the wiki)

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

 

 1

 

 

AI-builder-sf-accel 

2mo ago

I don't think the social momentum really connects well with the reality. It feels a bit like the utility of what Claude co-work is shooting for but with a lot more security risk. The potential for this assistant vertical is big but not sure this is right execution.

 

 1

 

 

pbalIII 

2mo ago

Last quarter I wired up one generalist agent to handle our full ops pipeline. Scan, draft, prefill, post. Within a week the failure mode was obvious... a wrong assumption in step 2 silently corrupted everything downstream, and debugging meant replaying the entire chain to find where context drifted.

Switched to narrow single-purpose agents with the database as the contract between them. Each one does one job, writes structured output, next one picks it up. Way less glamorous but when something breaks you know exactly where.

The configuration overhead you're describing is basically cognitive load with extra steps. A generalist agent that can do 50 things means you're the one holding the mental model of what it should and shouldn't touch. That's delegation without guardrails.

 

 1

 

 

scott-box 

2mo ago

Yeah the setup ate most of my first week too. I ended up just throwing it on a managed host (LobsterDesk) so I could skip the server stuff and actually test the agent side. Might be worth a look if the infra part is what's killing the experience for you. lobsterdesk.com

 

 1

 

 

TheOverzealousEngie 

1mo ago

Technology, advanced enough, is indistinguishable from magic. There is nothing magical about openclaw.

 

 1

 

 

Constant_Sandwich_31 

1mo ago

Openclaw is just an empty box, what It can do and how well it can do depends on yourself.

 

 1

 

 

LightweightSuperHero 

25d ago

I'm job hunting. Here are the skills I taught my OpenClaw bot. This saves me about four hours a day.

Skill 1. Job Match: Use MiniMax to Read my email inbox, Look for emails from Indeed, LinkedIn and Jack and Jill. Compare the new job postings in those emails to my resume. Create a report that includes a list of new jobs where my resume is a 70% or greater match, Include links to the job postings. . The name of the file for your report should be "JobMatch[date]". Send it to me in Telegram.

Skill 2. Score Resume: Use MiniMax. As a recruiter in the tech industry, compare my base resume to this job description. Tell me if my resume and the job are a match. Tell me the likely assesment an ATS system would give. Tell me the five strongest matches, and the five elements that would best improve the matching score.

Skill 3. Optimize Resume: Use Claude. As an expert recruiter in the technology field, compare my resume to this job descripition. Make a copy of my resume and append to the end of the new document your top top ten changes that will align my resume to the job description. For each of your top ten changes, tell me if the change influences a human reader or an ATS system. Do not inflate or invent new experience for my job experience.

Skill 4. Interview Prep: Using MiniMax, look at my google calendar for today. Find any events that look like an interview, an introductory call or a first meeting. For each meeting of this type, create an interview preparation document. The document should include a link to related job descriptions. Look up the company the person I am meeting with works at and add it to the report. If the company is public, find it's last two quarters of earnings. If the company is private, look on crunchbase and find it's last funding event. List the companies core products and services. Summarize the last two press releases. Create a list of likely interview questions. Create a document if there are any interviews today and send it to me on telegram.

Skill 5. Network Opportunity: Using Minimax, look at the last JobMatch document. For each job opportunity, I want you to find likely hiring managers, decision makers and recruiters who might have a stake in filling the role. Use SalesNavigator to create a list of names and LinkedIn Profile links. Put this in a report named "Networking[date]" and send it to me on telegram.

Skill 6. Proofread Resume: Using Claude, read this edited version of my resume. Create a new version of the resume and at the bottom of the document, add suggested edits that would imrove readability. Suggest new bullets or prose that would make greater impact. Point out any Typeos, incorrect punctionation or inconsistent formatting.

Job 1. Every morning, Monday through Friday, at 6:00 am, execute job match , then execute Optimize resume for each job match.- This scans my emails, finds new job opportunities, scores the opportunity and if it's a 70% or better match, creates suggestions for how to optimize my resume.

Job 2. Every morning at 7:05, execute Network Opportunity.-This prepares a list of networking tasks that support relevant job subissions.

Job 3. Every morning at 7:00am, monday through friday, execute interview prep.-Research complete, and I have an organized document that helps me prepare and understand context durign an interview.

I get up, read the job opportunity report. Look at the suggested resume changes for the jobs that make the most sense for me to invest my time in. Then I look at the resume change suggestions, edit and apply to those jobs. I spend time networking to influencers and sending messages to recruiters.

If I have an interview, I have an interview prep doc ready. I have practice questions ready. I know the backround.

______

Note that I have the robot append suggestions to my resume. I don't let it edit it. This way, my core resume remains the base of every customized resume. Same think for the proofreading. I'll edit the finished document.

I use OpenRouter to choose the model. MiniMax is inexpensive and does a great job for most everything except editing prose. Claude is the big winner for editing prose.

 

 1

 

[deleted] 

2mo ago

Comment removed by moderator

 

 1

 

Vinnyouss111 

2mo ago

I think you’re promoting the LatticeAI app. If you’re the founder, I just want to let you know that I paid for the setup, but the website is full of bugs. I paid for the OpenClaw setup, but I can’t download the files, can’t generate the token, and I can’t contact support. I’m getting JSON errors everywhere. It honestly feels like even the website was built by OpenClaw. I basically just wasted $19.

 

 2

Continue this thread 

[deleted] 

1mo ago

Comment removed by moderator

 

 1

 

LightweightSuperHero 

25d ago

Use OpenClaw to configure OpenClaw.

 

 1

Continue this thread

 

---

## View Post in

简体中文

Русский

हिन्दी

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Accessibility Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.

Expand Navigation Collapse Navigation


id: 7ef01d076073
title: I'm using OpenClaw to monitor AI music discussions and turn them ...
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2026-03-20T00:00:00+00:00
collected_at: 2026-04-01T01:02:23.279245+00:00
scenario_type: 工作流自动化
tools_used: ["OpenClaw", "Tunesona", "Tunee", "producer.ai"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["5a241dca4394", "707aa3dba594", "0ed02b58229f", "812ad789aa06", "a4713fb9eb43"]
summary:
用户使用OpenClaw构建了一套自动化工作流，监控Reddit和社交媒体上的AI音乐讨论，通过评估和框架处理来生成不同风格的内容草稿。该方案展示了多步骤任务链的实际应用，重点在于评估和内容决策而非单纯生成，适合创意内容制作领域。

source_url:
https://www.reddit.com/r/AIToolTesting/comments/1ryqgxr/im_using_openclaw_to_monitor_ai_music_discussions/

raw_content:
I'm using OpenClaw to monitor AI music discussions and turn them ...

I’m using OpenClaw to monitor AI music discussions and turn them into post drafts — this is the workflow : r/AIToolTesting Skip to main content I’m using OpenClaw to monitor AI music discussions and turn them into post drafts — this is the workflow : r/AIToolTesting

Go to AIToolTesting

r/AIToolTesting 5h ago

ObjectivePresent4162

# I’m using OpenClaw to monitor AI music discussions and turn them into post drafts — this is the workflow

I’ve been testing a fairly specific OpenClaw workflow around AI music content:

- monitor Reddit / social discussions around AI music

- identify which topics are actually gaining traction

- separate “people are talking about this” from “this is worth posting about”

- generate different drafts depending on the goal (discussion post, trend summary, comment-growth post, etc.)

- in some cases, use tools like Tunesona and Tunee(I use producer.ai before, but, you know now.....) inside that broader loop for testing music angles

What surprised me is that the generation step is the least interesting part.

The real bottlenecks are:

- evaluation

- framing

- deciding what has discussion potential

- keeping different content voices distinct

OpenClaw has been useful here because it feels less like “one-shot prompting” and more like something you can actually use to run a chain of tasks with continuity.

I’m curious how other people here are structuring agent workflows in creative niches, not just general productivity.

Read more

Share

---

• Promoted

Free lifetime NFR spam filtering subscription for resellers. Cloud based solution with nothing to install and no per-mailbox fees.

---

Past-Employee-3508

5h ago

Love this workflow breakdown — super clear and genuinely useful. 👏

Did you see how fast these “monitor → evaluate → draft” loops are becoming the new content edge this week? That shift is kinda wild.

If you want, pressure-test it with real agent-to-agent proofs here: https://www.clawbarter.com

1

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Accessibility Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.

Expand Navigation Collapse Navigation

Let us know your cookie preferences

Reddit uses cookies and similar technologies to:

- Monitor site usage and performance metrics
- Prevent fraud and abuse
- Keep the website operational and running properly

If you choose “Accept All” we’ll also use cookies to:

- Develop and improve new features and services
- Measure the performance of ads
- Personalize your recommendations and ads

If you choose “Reject Optional Cookies” we won’t use cookies for these additional uses. You can update your cookie preference from your settings.

Learn more about how Reddit uses cookies.

Accept All Reject Optional Cookies


id: f7b4b2160fd4
title: What AI workflows actually help your daily work, the ones you can't ...
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2025-11-18T00:00:00+00:00
collected_at: 2026-04-01T01:02:46.149372+00:00
scenario_type: 工作流自动化
tools_used: ["Gemini", "Kuse", "Lovable", "Cursor", "Apollo", "ChatGPT", "Perplexity", "Saner"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["d3c626ef2158", "fb050128f45f", "31db68f74626", "61a2b99fc903", "4a8b3582430c", "e1859e355e0c"]
summary:
该帖讨论了AI工具组合在日常工作中的实际应用，包括研究与知识管理、代码开发、销售自动化和任务管理等多个场景。用户分享了经过验证且已成为必不可少的工作流程，如Gemini+Kuse用于深度研究与内容组织、Lovable+Cursor用于快速网页开发，以及Apollo用于销售自动化，展现了AI在提高生产力方面的实际价值。

source_url:
https://www.reddit.com/r/automation/comments/1p00fva/what_ai_workflows_actually_help_your_daily_work/

raw_content:
What AI workflows actually help your daily work, the ones you can't ...

What AI workflows actually help your daily work, the ones you can't live without? : r/automation Skip to main content What AI workflows actually help your daily work, the ones you can't live without? : r/automation

Go to automation

r/automation 4mo ago

Informal_Variety_836

# What AI workflows actually help your daily work, the ones you can't live without?

For those of us who love using AI tool combos to boost productivity, do you have workflows that genuinely became part of your everyday work/life? Not the flashy concepts that pop up online, the ones that stick and truly work.

Here are a few combos I have been using recently and now consider essential:

Gemini + Kuse for research, idea expansion, organization, and output

When I am diving into a completely new area, I like to understand every detail of the topic, so Gemini's deep-research ability is definitely a lifesaver for me. And after I finish researching, I would import everything into a doc, and then upload all the source files, whether PDFs, videos, screenshots, whatever, into Kuse.

To me it feels like a more imaginative, more flexible version of NotebookLM. It helps me deeply read, organize, question, and transform all my raw materials into structured learning and outputs.

2. Lovable + Cursor for landing pages and portfolio websites

This combo saved me an unbelievable amount of time (and money). I usually find a template or style I love on Lovable and let it generate the structure and CSS/UI I need. Then I throw the whole codebase into Cursor for refinement. Trust me! This saves you so much energy compared to fighting with Cursor alone to get the UI/design right.

How about you? What AI tools have actually worked for you so far? And which ones are you planning to keep using or explore more in 2025?

Read more

Share

---

• Promoted

Discover the next evolution of enterprise automation with Redwood RangerAI, a new suite of AI capabilities designed to combat operational friction. 🤖

Collapse video player

---

KaiZerPrime_6904

4mo ago

I'm in SaaS sales and one AI workflow that actually earned a spot in my routine is the outbound setup in ap⁤ollo. I have been using their AI assistant pretty heavily. Right now I have it pulling current account lists, reviewing and sharpening my ICP, and then highlighting the signals I care about. Finding that it actually cuts down on my prep work a lot so I can focus on the outreach instead of rebuilding lists.

For everything else, I keep it simple. Chatgpt helps clean up notes and turn them into clear tasks, Perplexity handles quick checks when I’m researching something and I dabble a bit in Cursor which is gr⁤eat when I need a small script or automation.

11

1 more reply

Continue this thread

InterYuG1oCard

4mo ago

Mostly day planning, I use GTD method: braindump to an AI second brain app ( I use Saner), then it turns them to tasks on calendar. Plus every morning it plans the day for me automatically :) can’t live without for my ADHD brain

3

3 more replies

Continue this thread

Ok_Salamander_4692

3mo ago

I mainly use Claude or Workstation for writing tasks, meeting summaries, and cleaning up notes. Nothing fancy, just keeps me from staring at a blank doc. Perplexity has become my default for quick fact checking instead of opening 20 tabs.

Then there's the nice to have tier. I tried Notion for organizing everything, but it felt like overkill for what I actually needed. Otter is solid for transcription when I remember to turn it on, but half the time I just use my phone's voice memo and clean it up later.

I think the real lesson for me was to stop chasing every new tool that pops up and just stick with the 3 or 4 that handle my actual daily grind. If I'm not using it at least 3 times a week, it's just taking up mental space.

3

NewLog4967

4mo ago

Totally agree that the real AI winners are the specialized workflows that just disappear into your daily grind. My personal game-changers? Using Gemini + Kuse for deep research it’s like having a super-powered research assistant that can synthesize everything from PDFs to videos. And for building web projects, Lovable + Cursor is a cheat code; Lovable nails the initial UI so I can jump into Cursor to polish the logic without getting bogged down in design. The key is to start with one annoying task, pick a tool that's a specialist for it, and then just tweak as you go. These combos have genuinely saved me hours.

2

Psychological_Gap190

4mo ago

Omg that is a question that changes by Persone and needs. I recommend start with strategy, needs, and then tools. There ar a couple of good frameworks in the blog of svch.io also follow Andrew ng, he is great at choosing the rights ai tools

2

AutoModerator

4mo ago

Thank you for your post to r/automation!

New here? Please take a moment to read our rules, read them here.

This is an automated action so if you need anything, please Message the Mods with your request for assistance.

Lastly, enjoy your stay!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

1 more reply

Continue this thread

august-infotech

4mo ago

For me the AI stuff that actually stuck is pretty boring compared to all the “workflow” posts out there.

I mainly use:

1) ChatGPT + Notion

Not for anything fancy.

Mostly to clean up my messy notes and turn them into something I can revisit later. It’s basically my brain dump → organized notes pipeline at this point.

2) Perplexity for quick fact-checking or comparisons

Whenever I’m researching tools or reading about something new, it gives me a decent starting point without falling into 20 open tabs. Nothing magical, just saves time.

3) Claude for longer writing

I write a lot of docs and explanations for work, and Claude is the one which doesn’t over-rewrite my tone. So I use it as a “sanity check” more than a generator.

Outside of that, I don’t really use any big “AI workflows.” Most of the shiny stuff doesn’t stick for me. I’m planning to try Cursor properly in 2025 though, since everyone keeps talking about it.

1

1 more reply

Continue this thread

• Promoted

The everything app, for work. Get everyone working in a single platform designed to manage any type of work.

alinarice

4mo ago

Research organization and coding combos like Gemini+Cursor indispensable daily.

1

Informal_Variety_836

4mo ago

Yes Gemini is so powerful for doing deep research, for fact check or just quick overview I usually use perplexity

0

Continue this thread

srs890

4mo ago

One combo I’ve been leaning on lately is Claude + Kuse for research, Cursor for code refinement, and Perplexity for quick checks. If you’re into automating the “glue work” between all these tools, 100x Bot has actually been really solid for repetitive browser tasks like scraping, filing docs, or syncing things between apps without needing to build full workflows. It sits nicely alongside the rest of these without replacing them. curious what you use for anything beyond research and coding, like admin or ops tasks?

1

Informal_Variety_836

4mo ago

What is your workflow for combining Claude with Kuse? That sounds super interesting. I’ve been really into building claude skills lately, and I can definitely tell the potential power of kuse for building that kind of skill set as well since its context based settings

0

Continue this thread

Silly-Heat-1229

4mo ago

I use ChatGPT for brainstorming, then Perplexity for research to validate if I'm on the right track. After that, I'll spin up an MVP in Lovable. For the actual building, though, I'm mostly using Kilo Code in VS Code (our agency is collaborating with their team atm).

1

1 more reply

Continue this thread

GetNachoNacho

4mo ago

Solid workflows. The ones I can’t live without are:

AI note-stacking (research → summary → action steps)

Code refinement loops (quick drafts → instant debugging)

AI inbox triage + reply drafting

Daily content repurposing from long-form to short-form

They save hours every single day.

1

Strong_Teaching8548

4mo ago

the research part 100% when you're actually building something. i've dealt with this, the moment you stop treating ai as a magic answer machine and start using it as a thinking partner is when workflows actually stick

when i was figuring out what users actually wanted before building reddinbox, i realized i needed to go deeper than surface level searches. so i'd start with broad ai research to map the landscape, then dive into raw user conversations to find the real friction points. that combo of structured research + messy human data became non-negotiable

1

• Promoted

Join the next generation of CRM.

Imaginary-Carrot2532

4mo ago

right now I have really been loving gentube for making ai art. I prefer it over other models because it's faster and its unlimited

1

DueLifeguard5487

4mo ago

cursor feels like magic to me, and im non technical but managed to put together scripts and mini apps in a few hours by just asking cursor. Also github actions is awesome

1

[deleted]

4mo ago

Comment removed by moderator

0

ApprehensiveCrab96

4mo ago

Adssss

1

Informal_Variety_836

4mo ago

Yea I agree with your point, it does not need to something super fancy, if it can automate or just help some of my daily tasks completed more efficient, then it good enough. I actually found tools like claude surprisingly useful when I use it to simply update some github writing task instead of coding (coding sometimes can literally piss me off, but it's great overall

-1

Continue this thread

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Your Privacy Choices Accessibility Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.

Expand Navigation Collapse Navigation


id: f8a39dd2cc6e
title: Vibe coding workflow for automating unit tests : r/vibecoding - Reddit
summary: 用户探讨如何在vibe coding工作流中自动化单元测试，面临AI生成代码缺乏边界情况考虑的问题。提出利用AI辅助编写测试代码但由人工设计测试用例的混合方案，平衡快速原型开发与系统化测试的需求。
source_platform: reddit
author: unknown
published_at: 2025-11-28T00:00:00+00:00
collected_at: 2026-04-01T01:02:58.635061+00:00
scenario_type: 代码生成与审查
tools_used: ["AI/LLM", "GitHub Copilot", "Cursor", "Vibe coding website", "ChatGPT"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["6a3df6ad680d", "9db824473c2b", "1842541e1ac9", "4a5ecb108ac0", "b84b9fe32380"]
source_url:
https://www.reddit.com/r/vibecoding/comments/1p8wnn7/vibe_coding_workflow_for_automating_unit_tests/

raw_content:
Vibe coding workflow for automating unit tests : r/vibecoding - Reddit

Vibe coding workflow for automating unit tests : r/vibecoding Skip to main content Vibe coding workflow for automating unit tests : r/vibecoding 

 

 

 

Go to vibecoding 

r/vibecoding 4mo ago 

Plastic-Lettuce-7150 

 

# Vibe coding workflow for automating unit tests

I am new to vibe coding. I am a back end programmer, I haven't the foggiest about front end. I was though able to quite successfully build a prototype of an app. I have had at the back of my mind for years, which was great. I used a vibe coding website, the app was generated by the site, the code hosted by the site, and deployed by the site, it was extremely easy.

When it came to looking at the code instead of choosing to go through a React tutorial I opted to "fully give in to the vibes. forget that the code even exists." This was not a good idea in retrospect (except maybe for a quick prototype), I have since found out that AI does not think of edge cases and the architecture of the app. needs looking after as well. (There were a lot of bugs but giving the AI it's due they were ironed out with a few credits and a judicious prompt or two.)

However the only way I have of testing the app. is exploratory testing. This is not going to systematically test that it works. I need to be able to write unit tests and automate testing. I'd like to be able to generate the test code as well using AI.

My options as I see it are:

- creating a prompt to carry out testing, however I don't think this is feasible for a LLM for what could be a couple of hundred tests (it's a complicated app.)

- downloading the code and using GitHub Copilot or Cursor to write test cases and run tests

- abandoning the vibe coding website I have been using and using an IDE (Copilot, Cursor, etc.) to develop the app. (which I don't particularly want to do given Emergent has done such a good job so far (the UI is excellent) and how easy it is to deploy)

So my question is essentially how do you test vibe coded code apart from experience-based test techniques?

Read more

Share 

---

• Promoted

Work with your tools, in your environment. Codex for Windows, available with ChatGPT.

 

---

 

[deleted] 

4mo ago

Comment deleted by user

 

[deleted] 

4mo ago

Assert true

 

 2

 

redditissocoolyoyo 

4mo ago

This is very true. I am a QA tester and former developer. And God dang, you gotta still monitor and babysit it. Don't get lazy and sloppy and just prompt everything if you're trying to build a decent app. With that being said, structure the test cases as much as you can and go through it thoughtfully one by one.

 

 2

 

Plastic-Lettuce-7150 

4mo ago

I think the "fully give in to the vibes. forget that the code even exists" approach works for a prototype or an not particularly complex app., but otherwise for a beta release systematic testing is necessary. I propose to design the tests, but maybe have AI help code them. As to checking the code I think the rubric is to treat AI as a junior programmer, any code generated has to be checked. AI does not think of edge cases or think of architecture.

 

 2

 

kyngston 

4mo ago

but even though you have to read the code, thats still like 5-10x faster than typing it.

 

 1

 

 

ReallySubtle 

4mo ago

Use playwright / playwright mcp server

 

 3

 

Plastic-Lettuce-7150 

4mo ago

I don't think the hosted agent I am using has MCP servers in its toolbox. Would it be practical to run a hundred or so tests using playwright?

 

 1

Continue this thread 

[deleted] 

4mo ago

Use a real IDE to make tests. Cursor is great

 

 2

 

Plastic-Lettuce-7150 

4mo ago

Software complexity is a scale, I think there is a point on that scale where an app. is of such complexity that it is not possible to use a hosted agent to develop it, and an IDE is necessary, for among other reasons to be able to test the software.

 

 2

[deleted] 

4mo ago

Someone could create a vibe coding tool with a proper testing tool integration. Something visual like how my tests show red when they fail and green when they pass in a HUD display. You don’t have to read the test code even just the words describing it and if it passes or fails.

 

 1

Continue this thread Continue this thread

• Promoted

🚀 Vibe Code. Ship Faster. Spend Smarter. ⚡Qwen Coding Plan is LIVE on Alibaba Cloud Model Studio 💥Multi-model power on one platform. Seamless tool support. Faster shipping with the Qwen Coding Plan, with zero surprise bills.

 

 

 

afahrholz 

4mo ago

maybe something like sounds like vibe coding is great for quick wins but yeah real tests still need you to peek under the hood sooner or later

 

 2

 

Plastic-Lettuce-7150 

4mo ago

see reply to u/goodtimesKC

 

 1

Continue this thread 

 

ModeratelyMoco 

4mo ago

Does Emergent not have an SSH or GitHub sync option? I get the wanting to keep using the platform if it’s deployed and you like the interface but I’ll not use anything that isn’t even to work with in my own setup (Cursor with Claude Code) and have actually worked on a few projects that I ended up migrating off the platform because it wasn’t worth continuing paying to be locked into that platform

 

 1

 

Plastic-Lettuce-7150 

4mo ago

Emergent does have a Save to GitHub option.

It's looking like I'm going to have to switch to an IDE vibe coding platform to be able to code tests and run those tests. Having said that I am in a dialog with Emergent at the moment so I will see what they are able to do.

I liked the UI that Emergent has generated for my app., I would be hesitant to leave that aspect of Emergent, but I wouldn't want to subscribe to both Emergent and an IDE platform.

 

 1

 

ModeratelyMoco 

4mo ago

IDE isn’t very expensive to get the basics. I have some apps in lovable or vibecode app that I work on through GitHub or ssh to my IDE. And either way if you got it started with a nice UI and you go to GitHub and switch to an IDE you won’t be losing that front end

 

 1

Continue this thread Continue this thread 

[deleted] 

4mo ago

Antigravity has a browser extension. He can open the browser to do tests

 

 1

 

 

Dense_Gate_5193 

4mo ago

i run my own automation of continuously refining agents in a repository.

https://github.com/orneryd/Mimir/issues/12

 

 1

 

 

guywithknife 

4mo ago

Make sure to practice strict TDD: the tests need to be written before the code, they must assert the desired behavior. Otherwise the AI will just write tests that test the code foes whatever it does. I like to tell the AI to break the task into a todo list and have it explicitly list RED, GREEN, REFACTOR as individual todo steps that it must tick off. I also like to make it commit to git after every single todo step (yes, that means you should have one commit with failing tests every three commits).

 

 1

 

Reddit Rules Privacy Policy User Agreement Your Privacy Choices Accessibility Reddit, Inc. © 2026. All rights reserved.

Expand Navigation Collapse Navigation


id: 77d3c2e6be82
title: Show HN: Phantom – Open-source AI agent on its own VM that rewrites its config
source_url: https://github.com/ghostwright/phantom
source_platform: hackernews
author: mcheemaa
published_at: 2026-03-30T13:30:00+00:00
collected_at: 2026-04-01T01:03:13.756938+00:00
scenario_type: 工作流自动化
tools_used: ["Phantom", "AI agent", "VM", "config management"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["c72959eb8ed0", "cc892671a906", "69bdfd293baf", "da6cd49c549c"]
raw_content: Show HN: Phantom – Open-source AI agent on its own VM that rewrites its config
summary:
Phantom是一个开源AI代理，运行在独立虚拟机上，具有自动重写配置的能力，实现了智能化的系统自适应和工作流自动化。该项目展示了AI代理在自主学习和动态配置管理方面的潜力，适用于需要持续优化的复杂系统场景。


id: a0f083f30d91
title: Someone just converted Claude Leark from TypeScript to 100% Python
source_url: https://github.com/instructkr/claw-code
source_platform: hackernews
author: iamsyr
published_at: 2026-03-31T15:07:51+00:00
collected_at: 2026-04-01T01:03:50.444535+00:00
scenario_type: 代码生成与审查
tools_used: ["Claude", "TypeScript", "Python"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["84df05c8f6b2", "059dcd9ed4f2", "1842541e1ac9", "997ebe8dd738", "4a5ecb108ac0"]
raw_content: Someone just converted Claude Leark from TypeScript to 100% Python
summary:
这是关于将Claude Leark项目从TypeScript重新用Python实现的讨论,涉及编程语言转换和代码重构。该案例展示了使用Claude进行跨语言代码转换和现代化的实际应用,具有一定的技术参考价值。


id: 98b4d8d175a9
title: chatboxai/chatbox
source_url: https://github.com/chatboxai/chatbox
source_platform: github
author: chatboxai
published_at: 2026-03-31T09:39:55+00:00
collected_at: 2026-04-01T01:04:00.685945+00:00
scenario_type: 终端与CLI增强
tools_used: ["Claude", "ChatGPT", "Deepseek", "Gemini", "Ollama", "OpenAI"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["b1b1542da472", "52d44a688882", "1d33fcd888f9", "275d929bfde7"]
summary:
Chatbox是一个强大的AI客户端工具，支持多种AI模型（Claude、ChatGPT、Gemini等）的集成访问。该项目提供统一的用户界面和工具链增强，适合需要跨多个AI模型工作的开发者和用户提高效率。

raw_content:
chatboxai/chatbox

Powerful AI Client

Topics: assistant, chatbot, chatgpt, claude, copilot, deepseek, gemini, gpt, gpt-5, ollama, openai
Language: TypeScript | Stars: 39208


id: 7983b5991604
title: Show HN: We scored 50k PRs with AI – what we learned about code complexity
source_url: https://gitvelocity.dev
source_platform: hackernews
author: chuboy
published_at: 2026-03-30T14:18:09+00:00
collected_at: 2026-04-01T01:04:10.772878+00:00
scenario_type: 商业流程自动化
tools_used: ["Claude API", "GitVelocity", "PR analysis", "code scoring system"]
novelty: similar
similar_to_ids: ["f04f8a6aa88f", "2f043903e426", "954dc3a3a586"]
summary:
GitVelocity通过Claude对50000+个PR进行多维度代码复杂度评分，帮助工程团队获得真实的代码质量和生产力数据。该系统通过可视化的绩效反馈激励工程师改进代码质量，并支持团队基准对比，是代码评审自动化和工程管理的实践案例。

raw_content:
Show HN: We scored 50k PRs with AI – what we learned about code complexity

I&#x27;m a CTO with a ~16-person engineering team. Last year I wanted real data on what was actually shipping, not guesswork or story point theater. So we built GitVelocity.<p>Every merged PR gets scored 0–100 by Claude across six dimensions: scope (0–20), architecture (0–20), implementation (0–20), risk (0–20), quality (0–15), perf&#x2F;security (0–5). Six dimensions added up, then scaled by change size — a 10-line fix scores lower than a 500-line refactor even at the same complexity. Full formula at gitvelocity.dev&#x2F;scoring-guide.<p>After scoring 50,000+ PRs across TypeScript, Python, Rust, Go, Java, Elixir, and more, some things surprised us:<p><i>Big PRs don&#x27;t automatically score high.</i> An 800-line migration with low complexity scores worse than a 200-line architectural change. Size gets you the full multiplier, but the base score still has to earn it.<p><i>You can&#x27;t score well without tests.</i> The quality dimension (0–15) won&#x27;t give you points without test coverage. At similar experience levels, this was the clearest separator between engineers.<p><i>Juniors started outscoring some seniors.</i> They adopted AI tools faster and took on harder problems. Once they could see their own scores, they aimed higher.<p><i>We score AI-generated code the same as human-written code.</i> Code is code. An engineer who uses AI to ship more complex work faster is more productive, and their scores reflect that.<p>Scoring consistency was the hardest technical problem. Without reference examples anchoring each dimension, Claude&#x27;s scores drifted 15+ points between runs. With 18 calibrated anchors (three per dimension at low&#x2F;mid&#x2F;high), we got it down to 2–4 points on the same PR.<p>The thing we didn&#x27;t expect was behavioral. We call it the Fitbit effect — the tool doesn&#x27;t make you ship better code, but seeing the score does. Engineers started referencing their own scores in 1:1s unprompted, because the numbers matched what they already felt about their work. A junior who shipped a tricky concurrency fix could point to a score that proved it wasn&#x27;t &quot;just a small PR.&quot;<p>We recently added team benchmarks (gitvelocity.dev&#x2F;demo&#x2F;benchmarks). Once you&#x27;re scoring PRs, you can see how your team compares to others across the dataset — about 1,000 engineers on 60 teams so far. Headline&#x27;s team ships faster than roughly 95% of them, which was nice to confirm but also made us wonder who the other 5% are. The competitive angle surprised us: teams that were skeptical about individual scores got genuinely curious once they could measure themselves against the field.<p>Every score is fully visible to the engineer who wrote the PR, with per-dimension breakdowns and reasoning. There&#x27;s no hidden dashboard that management sees and engineers don&#x27;t.<p>Free, BYOK (your Anthropic API key). We default to Sonnet 4.6, which scores nearly as well as Opus 4.6 at a fraction of the cost — but you can switch models if you want. Pennies per PR either way. No source code stored, diffs analyzed and discarded. Works with GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket.<p>Ask me anything about the scoring methodology, how we solved calibration, or what it was actually like rolling this out to a team.


